Literature DB >> 28940142

The effects of aquaculture on mercury distribution, changing speciation, and bioaccumulation in a reservoir ecosystem.

Peng Liang1,2,3, Xinbin Feng4, Qiongzhi You2, Xuefei Gao2, Jialin Xu2, Minghung Wong3, Peter Christie2, Sheng-Chun Wu5.   

Abstract

A survey was conducted in a freshwater reservoir located in Guizhou province, south China, to investigate the influence of fish aquaculture activities on mercury (Hg) distribution, speciation change, and bioaccumulation. Water, sediment, and aquaculture fish samples were collected from aquaculture sites (AS) and the corresponding reference sites (RS). The results showed that total mercury (THg) concentration in overlying water in Wujiangdu reservoir reached 6.87 ± 14.9 ng L-1. THg concentration in a different layer follows the sequence: surface layer > bottom layer > three intermediate layers with significant difference. In addition, the total methylmercury (TMeHg) concentration in overlying water was 0.113 ± 0.211 ng L-1. The highest TMeHg was observed in the bottom layer. Both dissolved Hg (DHg) and dissolved methylmercury (DMeHg) accounted for more than 50% of THg and TMeHg in the top four layers of overlying water, respectively. In contrast, particulate Hg (PHg) and particulate methylmercury were the major portion of THg and TMeHg in bottom layer and reached to 67 and 58.7% of THg and TMeHg, respectively. Aquaculture activities were estimated to contribute an annual loading of approximately 69.8 ng g-1of THg yearly in the top 1 cm of sediment underneath the rafts due to unconsumed fish feed. The extra loading of THg in sediment may have potential to stimulate the release of Hg to the overlying water. Both DMeHg and DHg in sediment pore water and organic matter (OM) contents in the top 4 cm of AS were noticeably higher than RS, which indicated that the accumulation of OM due to aquaculture activities promoted MeHg production in the top surface of sediment pore water. No significant difference was noted between THg in RS (296 ± 104 ng g-1) and AS (274 ± 132 ng g-1) in the solid phase. In addition, the sediments were net sources of both MeHg and inorganic Hg. For Hg in fish tissues, THg and inorganic Hg (IHg) in the liver were significantly higher (THg: p < 0.001, F = 9.98; IHg: p < 0.001, F = 13.1) than those in the other organs. In contrast, MeHg concentration in the muscle was significantly higher than (p < 0.01, F = 4.83) that in the other organs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Fish; Methylmercury; Organic matter; Sediment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28940142     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0189-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  20 in total

1.  The influence of mariculture on mercury distribution in sediments and fish around Hong Kong and adjacent mainland China waters.

Authors:  Peng Liang; Ding-Ding Shao; Sheng-Chun Wu; Jian-Bo Shi; Xiao-lin Sun; Fu-Yong Wu; S C L Lo; Wen-Xiong Wang; Ming H Wong
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Influence of eutrophication on the distribution of total mercury and methylmercury in hydroelectric reservoirs.

Authors:  Bo Meng; X B Feng; C X Chen; G L Qiu; J Sommar; Y N Guo; P Liang; Q Wan
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.751

3.  Geochemical processes of mercury in Wujiangdu and Dongfeng reservoirs, Guizhou, China.

Authors:  Xinbin Feng; Hongmei Jiang; Guangle Qiu; Haiyu Yan; Guanghui Li; Zhonggen Li
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Binding constants of divalent mercury (Hg2+) in soil humic acids and soil organic matter.

Authors:  Abdul R Khwaja; Paul R Bloom; Patrick L Brezonik
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Factors controlling the bioaccumulation of mercury, methylmercury, arsenic, selenium, and cadmium by freshwater invertebrates and fish.

Authors:  R P Mason; J Laporte; S Andres
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Comparative effects of dietary methylmercury on gene expression in liver, skeletal muscle, and brain of the zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  P Gonzalez; Y Dominique; J C Massabuau; A Boudou; J P Bourdineaud
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Role of mariculture in the loading and speciation of mercury at the coast of the East China Sea.

Authors:  Peng Liang; Xuefei Gao; Qiongzhi You; Jin Zhang; Yucheng Cao; Chan Zhang; Ming-Hung Wong; Sheng-Chun Wu
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Mercury distribution in key tissues of fish (Liza aurata) inhabiting a contaminated estuary-implications for human and ecosystem health risk assessment.

Authors:  Cláudia Leopoldina Mieiro; Mário Pacheco; Maria Eduarda Pereira; Armando Costa Duarte
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2009-03-24

9.  Mercury mass balance study in Wujiangdu and Dongfeng Reservoirs, Guizhou, China.

Authors:  Xinbin Feng; Hongmei Jiang; Guangle Qiu; Haiyu Yan; Guanghui Li; Zhonggen Li
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects.

Authors:  Charles T Driscoll; Robert P Mason; Hing Man Chan; Daniel J Jacob; Nicola Pirrone
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  1 in total

1.  Purification of water contaminated with Hg using horizontal subsurface constructed wetlands.

Authors:  Rajendra Prasad Singh; Jiaguo Wu; Dafang Fu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.