Chang Hyun Lim1, Thien Suong Luu2, Le Quy Phoung2, Tae Seok Jeong3, Chang Keun Kim4. 1. Human Physiology, Korea National Sport University, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Hochiminh City University of Sport, Hochiminh City, Vietnam. 3. SPIK Sport Medicine Clinic and Performance Center, Seoul, South Korea. 4. Human Physiology, Korea National Sport University, Seoul, South Korea. ckkim@knsu.ac.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Our aim was to compare the effects of a single exercise training mode (resistance exercise) with a combined exercise training (resistance and plyometric exercise) mode on satellite cell activity and anabolic signaling at the molecular level. METHODS:Eighteen male weight lifters (20 ± 4 years, BMI 27 ±6 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to either a series of resistance exercise or a series of combined exercise group. The intensity of the exercise was set at 60% of their 1 RM weight and subjects completed three sets each of six repetitions. The combined exercise group performed three different types of resistance exercise alternating with three different types of plyometric exercise, whereas the resistance exercise group performed only the three different types of resistance exercise which was repeated twice. Muscle biopsies were obtained the vastus lateralis muscle immediately before and 3 h after one bout of exercise. RESULTS: Exercise induced increases in satellite cell activation and myofibrillar protein synthesis following both exercise modes, but the resistance exercise group was superior compared to the combined exercise group in satellite cell activity expressed by Ki67/CD56 (165 vs 232%) and PI3K/Akt protein expression (121 vs 157%), mTOR protein expression (117 vs 288%), p70S6K protein expression (253 vs 809%), and 4E-BP1 protein expression (70 vs 139%) of anabolic signaling pathway. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the previous findings showing a greater effect of combined as opposed to a single exercise mode could be the effect of a greater training volume rather than a true-training effect of a combined exercise program.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Our aim was to compare the effects of a single exercise training mode (resistance exercise) with a combined exercise training (resistance and plyometric exercise) mode on satellite cell activity and anabolic signaling at the molecular level. METHODS: Eighteen male weight lifters (20 ± 4 years, BMI 27 ± 6 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to either a series of resistance exercise or a series of combined exercise group. The intensity of the exercise was set at 60% of their 1 RM weight and subjects completed three sets each of six repetitions. The combined exercise group performed three different types of resistance exercise alternating with three different types of plyometric exercise, whereas the resistance exercise group performed only the three different types of resistance exercise which was repeated twice. Muscle biopsies were obtained the vastus lateralis muscle immediately before and 3 h after one bout of exercise. RESULTS: Exercise induced increases in satellite cell activation and myofibrillar protein synthesis following both exercise modes, but the resistance exercise group was superior compared to the combined exercise group in satellite cell activity expressed by Ki67/CD56 (165 vs 232%) and PI3K/Akt protein expression (121 vs 157%), mTOR protein expression (117 vs 288%), p70S6K protein expression (253 vs 809%), and 4E-BP1 protein expression (70 vs 139%) of anabolic signaling pathway. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the previous findings showing a greater effect of combined as opposed to a single exercise mode could be the effect of a greater training volume rather than a true-training effect of a combined exercise program.
Authors: A L Mackey; B Esmarck; F Kadi; S O A Koskinen; M Kongsgaard; A Sylvestersen; J J Hansen; G Larsen; M Kjaer Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Troy A Hornberger; Rudy Stuppard; Kevin E Conley; Mark J Fedele; Marta L Fiorotto; Eva R Chin; Karyn A Esser Journal: Biochem J Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 3.857
Authors: F Arntz; B Mkaouer; A Markov; B J Schoenfeld; J Moran; R Ramirez-Campillo; M Behrens; P Baumert; R M Erskine; L Hauser; H Chaabene Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 4.755