Literature DB >> 2893969

Overload protection: avoidance response to heavy plantar surface loading.

S E Robbins1, A M Hanna, G J Gouw.   

Abstract

Current footwear which are designed for use in running are examples of intentional biomechanical model integration into device design. The inadequacy of this footwear in protecting against injury is postulated to be due to fixation on inadequate models of locomotory biomechanics that do not provide for feedback control; in particular, an hypothesized plantar surface sensory-mediated feedback control system, which imparts overload protection during locomotion. A heuristic approach was used to identify the hypothesized system. A random series of loads (0 to 164 kg) was applied to the knee flexed at 90 degrees. In this testing system, plantar surface avoidance behavior was the difference between the sum of the leg weight and the load applied to the knee, and the load measured at the plantar surface; this was produced by activation of hip flexors. Significant avoidance behavior was found in all of the subjects (P less than 0.001). On all surfaces tested, including modern athletic footwear (P less than 0.001), its magnitude increased directly in relation to the load applied to the knee (P less than 0.001). There were significant differences in avoidance behavior in relation to the weight-bearing surfaces tested (P less than 0.05). With the identification of a feedback control system which would serve to moderate loading during locomotion, an explanation is provided as to why current athletic footwear do not protect and may be injurious; thus allowing the design of footwear which may be truly protective.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2893969     DOI: 10.1249/00005768-198802000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  8 in total

1.  Athletic footwear, leg stiffness, and running kinematics.

Authors:  Mark Bishop; Paul Fiolkowski; Bryan Conrad; Denis Brunt; MaryBeth Horodyski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Athletic footwear and chronic overloading. A brief review.

Authors:  S E Robbins; G J Gouw
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Factors associated with ankle injuries. Preventive measures.

Authors:  S Robbins; E Waked
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Hazard of deceptive advertising of athletic footwear.

Authors:  S Robbins; E Waked
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  A comparison of lower limb EMG and ground reaction forces between barefoot and shod gait in participants with diabetic neuropathic and healthy controls.

Authors:  Isabel C N Sacco; Paula M H Akashi; Ewald M Hennig
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Footwear and Foam Surface Alter Gait Initiation of Typical Subjects.

Authors:  Marcus Fraga Vieira; Isabel de Camargo Neves Sacco; Fernanda Grazielle da Silva Azevedo Nora; Dieter Rosenbaum; Paula Hentschel Lobo da Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Dynamic loading and kinematics analysis of vertical jump based on different forefoot morphology.

Authors:  Yang Shu; Yan Zhang; Lin Fu; Gusztáv Fekete; Julien S Baker; Jianshe Li; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-11-22

8.  Heel-toe running: A new look at the influence of foot strike pattern on impact force.

Authors:  John A Mercer; Sarah Horsch
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.103

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.