Literature DB >> 28938710

Hormone Therapy Use and Risk of Chronic Disease in the Nurses' Health Study: A Comparative Analysis With the Women's Health Initiative.

Shilpa N Bhupathiraju, Francine Grodstein, Bernard A Rosner, Meir J Stampfer, Frank B Hu, Walter C Willett, JoAnn E Manson.   

Abstract

Observational studies and randomized controlled trials of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and chronic disease risk appear to have divergent results for cardiovascular disease. However, differences may be related to a modifying effect of age, time since menopause, and HT formulation. In the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) (enrolling during 1980-1994 and following participants until 2002), we investigated associations between the use of oral conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) (0.625 mg/day) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) (<10 mg/day) or oral CEE alone and cardiovascular disease, cancer, all-cause mortality, and other major endpoints among postmenopausal women, aged 50-79 years at HT initiation. Among women aged 50-59 years at HT initiation, associations of CEE alone or CEE+MPA with most clinical outcomes were highly concordant between NHS and Women's Health Initiative (WHI). However, for myocardial infarction, results for CEE+MPA were in the direction of risk elevation in WHI and in the direction of risk reduction in NHS. When examined according to years since menopause onset (<10 years) rather than age group, results were nonsignificant and concordant for both studies. Because few women in the NHS initiated HT after age 60 years, we did not examine associations in this group. Discrepancies between NHS and WHI could largely be attributed to differences in the age structure of the populations and age at HT initiation.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nurses’ Health Study; Women's Health Initiative; cardiovascular disease; chronic disease; epidemiologic methods; hormone therapy; randomized controlled trials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28938710      PMCID: PMC5860527          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  50 in total

Review 1.  The protective effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  M E Mendelsohn; R H Karas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The discrepancy between observational studies and randomized trials of menopausal hormone therapy.

Authors:  Francine Grodstein; JoAnn E Manson; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  The 2012 hormone therapy position statement of: The North American Menopause Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

5.  Cigarette smoking, relative weight, and menopause.

Authors:  W Willett; M J Stampfer; C Bain; R Lipnick; F E Speizer; B Rosner; D Cramer; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Effect of 17-beta estradiol on pre-existing atherosclerotic lesions: role of the endothelium.

Authors:  H Hanke; J Kamenz; S Hanke; J Spiess; C Lenz; U Brehme; B Bruck; G Finking; V Hombach
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 5.162

7.  Combined postmenopausal hormone therapy and cardiovascular disease: toward resolving the discrepancy between observational studies and the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial.

Authors:  Ross L Prentice; Robert Langer; Marcia L Stefanick; Barbara V Howard; Mary Pettinger; Garnet Anderson; David Barad; J David Curb; Jane Kotchen; Lewis Kuller; Marian Limacher; Jean Wactawski-Wende
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Reproducibility and validity of self-reported menopausal status in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; W C Willett; W B Stason; B Rosner; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  The discrepancy between observational studies and randomized trials of menopausal hormone therapy: did expectations shape experience?

Authors:  Nananda F Col; Stephen G Pauker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-12-02       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. National Diabetes Data Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 9.461

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A heartfelt message, estrogen replacement therapy: use it or lose it.

Authors:  Robert C Speth; Mikayla D'Ambra; Hong Ji; Kathryn Sandberg
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  RE: "HORMONE THERAPY USE AND RISK OF CHRONIC DISEASE IN THE NURSES' HEALTH STUDY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITH THE WOMEN'S HEALTH INITIATIVE".

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Estrogen receptor profiles across tissues from male and female Rattus norvegicus.

Authors:  Dillion D Hutson; Rakesh Gurrala; Benard O Ogola; Margaret A Zimmerman; Ricardo Mostany; Ryousuke Satou; Sarah H Lindsey
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 5.027

Review 4.  Cardiovascular health and the menopausal woman: the role of estrogen and when to begin and end hormone treatment.

Authors:  Frederick Naftolin; Jenna Friedenthal; Richard Nachtigall; Lila Nachtigall
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-09-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.