Literature DB >> 28938415

Rationalizing Thyroid Function Testing: Which TSH Cutoffs Are Optimal for Testing Free T4?

Meg Henze1, Suzanne J Brown2, Narelle C Hadlow3, John P Walsh2,4.   

Abstract

Context: Thyroid function testing often uses thyrotropin (TSH) measurement first, followed by reflex testing for free thyroxine (T4) if TSH is outside the reference range. The utility of different TSH cutoffs for reflex testing is unknown. Objective: To examine different TSH cutoffs for reflex free T4 testing. Design, Setting, and Patients: We analyzed concurrent TSH and free T4 results from 120,403 individuals from a single laboratory in Western Australia (clinical cohort) and 4568 Busselton Health Study participants (community cohort).
Results: In the clinical cohort, restricting free T4 measurement to individuals with TSH <0.3 or >5.0 mU/L resulted in a 22% reduction in free T4 testing compared with a TSH reference range of 0.4 to 4.0 mU/L; using TSH cutoffs of 0.2 and 6.0 mU/L resulted in a 34% reduction in free T4 testing. In the community cohort, the corresponding effect was less: 3.3% and 4.8% reduction in free T4 testing. In the clinical cohort, using TSH cutoffs of 0.2 and 6.0 mU/L, elevated free T4 would go undetected in 4.2% of individuals with TSH levels of 0.2 to 0.4 mU/L. In most, free T4 was marginally elevated and unlikely to indicate clinically relevant hyperthyroidism. Low free T4 would go undetected in 2.5% of individuals with TSH levels of 4 to 6 mU/L; in 94%, free T4 was marginally reduced and unlikely to indicate clinically relevant hypothyroidism. Conclusions: Setting TSH cutoffs at 0.1 to 0.2 mU/L less than and 1 to 2 mU/L greater than the reference range for reflex testing of free T4 would reduce the need for free T4 testing, with minimal effect on case finding.
Copyright © 2017 Endocrine Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28938415     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-01322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  5 in total

1.  What happens when laboratory reference ranges change?

Authors:  Duncan J Topliss
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Laboratory Testing in Thyroid Conditions - Pitfalls and Clinical Utility.

Authors:  Shui Boon Soh; Tar Choon Aw
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Association between the use of allopurinol and risk of increased thyroid-stimulating hormone level.

Authors:  Wona Choi; Yoon-Sik Yang; Dong-Jin Chang; Yeon Woong Chung; HyungMin Kim; Soo Jeong Ko; Sooyoung Yoo; Ji Seon Oh; Dong Yoon Kang; Hyeon-Jong Yang; In Young Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Screening for thyroid dysfunction with free T4 instead of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) improves efficiency in older adults in primary care.

Authors:  Madeleen Bosma; Robert S Du Puy; Bart E P B Ballieux
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 12.782

Review 5.  Challenges in Interpreting Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Results in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Dysfunction.

Authors:  Salman Razvi; Sindeep Bhana; Sanaa Mrabeti
Journal:  J Thyroid Res       Date:  2019-09-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.