Alicia K Au1, Robert S B Clark. 1. aDepartment of Critical Care Medicine bDepartment of Pediatrics, Safar Center for Resuscitation Research and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability in children. Prognostication of outcome following TBI is challenging in this population and likely requires complex, multimodal models to achieve clinically relevant accuracy. This review highlights injury characteristics, physiological indicators, biomarkers and neuromonitoring modalities predictive of outcome that may be integrated for future development of sensitive and specific prognostic models. RECENT FINDINGS: Paediatric TBI is responsible for physical, psychosocial and neurocognitive deficits that may significantly impact quality of life. Outcome prognostication can be difficult in the immature brain, but is aided by the identification of novel biomarkers (neuronal, astroglial, myelin, inflammatory, apoptotic and autophagic) and neuromonitoring techniques (electroencephalogram and MRI). Investigation in the future may focus on assessing the prognostic ability of combinations of biochemical, protein, neuroimaging and functional biomarkers and the use of mathematical models to develop multivariable predication tools to improve the prognostic ability following childhood TBI. SUMMARY: Prognostication of outcome following paediatric TBI is multidimensional, influenced by injury severity, age, physiological factors, biomarkers, electroencephalogram and neuroimaging. Further development, integration and validation of combinatorial prognostic algorithms are necessary to improve the accuracy and timeliness of prognosis in a meaningful fashion.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability in children. Prognostication of outcome following TBI is challenging in this population and likely requires complex, multimodal models to achieve clinically relevant accuracy. This review highlights injury characteristics, physiological indicators, biomarkers and neuromonitoring modalities predictive of outcome that may be integrated for future development of sensitive and specific prognostic models. RECENT FINDINGS: Paediatric TBI is responsible for physical, psychosocial and neurocognitive deficits that may significantly impact quality of life. Outcome prognostication can be difficult in the immature brain, but is aided by the identification of novel biomarkers (neuronal, astroglial, myelin, inflammatory, apoptotic and autophagic) and neuromonitoring techniques (electroencephalogram and MRI). Investigation in the future may focus on assessing the prognostic ability of combinations of biochemical, protein, neuroimaging and functional biomarkers and the use of mathematical models to develop multivariable predication tools to improve the prognostic ability following childhood TBI. SUMMARY: Prognostication of outcome following paediatric TBI is multidimensional, influenced by injury severity, age, physiological factors, biomarkers, electroencephalogram and neuroimaging. Further development, integration and validation of combinatorial prognostic algorithms are necessary to improve the accuracy and timeliness of prognosis in a meaningful fashion.
Authors: Brian F Flaherty; Margaret L Jackson; Charles S Cox; Amy Clark; Linda Ewing-Cobbs; Richard Holubkov; Kevin R Moore; Rajan P Patel; Heather T Keenan Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Cece C Kooper; Jaap Oosterlaan; Hilgo Bruining; Marc Engelen; Petra J W Pouwels; Arne Popma; Job B M van Woensel; Dennis R Buis; Marjan E Steenweg; Maayke Hunfeld; Marsh Königs Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Emily L Dennis; Karen Caeyenberghs; Robert F Asarnow; Talin Babikian; Brenda Bartnik-Olson; Erin D Bigler; Anthony Figaji; Christopher C Giza; Naomi J Goodrich-Hunsaker; Cooper B Hodges; Kristen R Hoskinson; Marsh Königs; Harvey S Levin; Hannah M Lindsey; Abigail Livny; Jeffrey E Max; Tricia L Merkley; Mary R Newsome; Alexander Olsen; Nicholas P Ryan; Matthew S Spruiell; Stacy J Suskauer; Sophia I Thomopoulos; Ashley L Ware; Christopher G Watson; Anne L Wheeler; Keith Owen Yeates; Brandon A Zielinski; Paul M Thompson; David F Tate; Elisabeth A Wilde Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 3.978