Sarah E Rothenberg1, Brian P Jackson2, G Carly McCalla3, Alexis Donohue4, Alison M Emmons2. 1. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA; School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. Electronic address: sarah.rothenberg@oregonstate.edu. 2. Trace Element Analysis Core Laboratory, Department of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. 3. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA; School of the Earth, Ocean and Environment, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. 4. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rice is an important dietary source for methylmercury (MeHg), a potent neurotoxin, and inorganic arsenic (As), a human carcinogen. Rice baby cereals are a dietary source of inorganic As; however, less is known concerning MeHg concentrations in rice baby cereals and rice teething biscuits. METHODS: MeHg concentrations were measured in 36 rice baby cereals, eight rice teething biscuits, and four baby cereals manufactured with oats/wheat (n = 48 total). Arsenic (As) species, including inorganic As, were determined in rice baby cereals and rice teething biscuits (n = 44/48), while total As was determined in all products (n = 48). RESULTS: Rice baby cereals and rice teething biscuits were on average 61 and 92 times higher in MeHg, respectively, and 9.4 and 4.7 times higher in total As, respectively, compared to wheat/oat baby cereals. For a 15-g serving of rice baby cereal, average MeHg intake was 0.0092μgday-1 (range: 0.0013-0.034μgday-1), while average inorganic As intake was 1.3μgday-1 (range: 0.37-2.3μgday-1). Inorganic As concentrations in two brands of rice baby cereal (n = 12/36 boxes of rice cereal) exceeded 100ng/g, the proposed action level from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Log10 MeHg and inorganic As concentrations in rice baby cereals were strongly, positively correlated (Pearson's rho = 0.60, p < 0.001, n = 36). CONCLUSIONS: Rice-containing baby cereals and teething biscuits were a dietary source of both MeHg and inorganic As. Studies concerning the cumulative impacts of MeHg and inorganic As on offspring development are warranted.
BACKGROUND:Rice is an important dietary source for methylmercury (MeHg), a potent neurotoxin, and inorganic arsenic (As), a human carcinogen. Rice baby cereals are a dietary source of inorganic As; however, less is known concerning MeHg concentrations in rice baby cereals and rice teething biscuits. METHODS:MeHg concentrations were measured in 36 rice baby cereals, eight rice teething biscuits, and four baby cereals manufactured with oats/wheat (n = 48 total). Arsenic (As) species, including inorganic As, were determined in rice baby cereals and rice teething biscuits (n = 44/48), while total As was determined in all products (n = 48). RESULTS:Rice baby cereals and rice teething biscuits were on average 61 and 92 times higher in MeHg, respectively, and 9.4 and 4.7 times higher in total As, respectively, compared to wheat/oat baby cereals. For a 15-g serving of rice baby cereal, average MeHg intake was 0.0092μgday-1 (range: 0.0013-0.034μgday-1), while average inorganic As intake was 1.3μgday-1 (range: 0.37-2.3μgday-1). Inorganic As concentrations in two brands of rice baby cereal (n = 12/36 boxes of rice cereal) exceeded 100ng/g, the proposed action level from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Log10 MeHg and inorganic As concentrations in rice baby cereals were strongly, positively correlated (Pearson's rho = 0.60, p < 0.001, n = 36). CONCLUSIONS:Rice-containing baby cereals and teething biscuits were a dietary source of both MeHg and inorganic As. Studies concerning the cumulative impacts of MeHg and inorganic As on offspring development are warranted.
Authors: Andres Cardenas; Devin C Koestler; E Andres Houseman; Brian P Jackson; Molly L Kile; Margaret R Karagas; Carmen J Marsit Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Bo Meng; Xinbin Feng; Guangle Qiu; Christopher W N Anderson; Jianxu Wang; Lei Zhao Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2014-06-23 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Sarah E Rothenberg; Xiaodan Yu; Jihong Liu; Fred J Biasini; Chuan Hong; Xu Jiang; Yanfen Nong; Yue Cheng; Susan A Korrick Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Andrew A Meharg; Guoxin Sun; Paul N Williams; Eureka Adomako; Claire Deacon; Yong-Guan Zhu; Joerg Feldmann; Andrea Raab Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: Margaret R Karagas; Tracy Punshon; Vicki Sayarath; Brian P Jackson; Carol L Folt; Kathryn L Cottingham Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Brian P Jackson; Vivien F Taylor; Margaret R Karagas; Tracy Punshon; Kathryn L Cottingham Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Lorenz S Neuwirth; Ericka Cabañas; Patrick Cadet; Wei Zhu; Morri E Markowitz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Sarah E Rothenberg; Susan A Korrick; Jihong Liu; Yanfen Nong; Hua Nong; Chuan Hong; Eva P Trinh; Xu Jiang; Fred J Biasini; Fengxiu Ouyang Journal: Environ Health Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 5.984