| Literature DB >> 28938019 |
Mohammed M Rahman1,2, Mohammad Musarraf Hussain1,2, Abdullah M Asiri1,2.
Abstract
Iron oxide ornamented carbon nanotube nanocomposites (Fe3O4.CNT NCs) were prepared by a wet-chemical process in basic means. The optical, morphological, and structural characterizations of Fe3O4.CNT NCs were performed using FTIR, UV/Vis., FESEM, TEM; XEDS, XPS, and XRD respectively. Flat GCE had been fabricated with a thin-layer of NCs using a coating binding agent. It was performed for the chemical sensor development by a dependable I-V technique. Among all interfering analytes, 3-methoxyphenol (3-MP) was selective towards the fabricated sensor. Increased electrochemical performances for example elevated sensitivity, linear dynamic range (LDR) and continuing steadiness towards selective 3-MP had been observed with chemical sensor. The calibration graph found linear (R2 = 0.9340) in a wide range of 3-MP concentration (90.0 pM ~ 90.0 mM). The limit of detection and sensitivity were considered as 1.0 pM and 9×10-4 μAμM-1cm-2 respectively. The prepared of Fe3O4.CNT NCs by a wet-chemical progression is an interesting route for the development of hazardous phenolic sensor based on nanocomposite materials. It is also recommended that 3-MP sensor is exhibited a promising performances based on Fe3O4.CNT NCs by a facile I-V method for the significant applications of toxic chemicals for the safety of environmental and health-care fields.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28938019 PMCID: PMC5609863 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177817
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 2(a-c) UV/Vis spectra and (b-d) Band-gap energy plot of Fe3O4 NPs and Fe3O4.CNT NCs.
Fig 1Schematic representation of growth mechanism of Fe3O4.CNTs NCs by a wet-chemical process.
Fig 6XPS study of CNT, Fe3O4 NPs, and Fe3O4.CNT NCs (a) Full spectrum, (b) C1s level, (c) O1s, and (d) Fe2+ 2p3/2 and Fe2+ 2p1/2 level.
Fig 7TEM analysis of Fe3O4.CNT nanocomposites (a-b) Low-to-high magnified images.
Detection of phenols using different electrochemical approach.
| Electrode | Methods | Phenols | Sensitivity (μAμM-1cm-2) | LOD | LDR | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (pM) | (mM) | |||||
| I-V | 3-MP | 3.829 μAmM-1cm-2 | 360 | 0.4–40.0 | [ | |
| I-V | 4-AP | 6.33 × 10−4 | 15 | - | [ | |
| DPV | 4-AP | 1.776042 | 0.065 mM | 0.2–20, 20–100 | [ | |
| AM | 4-AP | 27.2 | 0.03 mM | 0.4–200 | [ | |
| I-V | 2-NP | 1.6 × 10−3 | 60 | 100.0 pM -100.0 μM | [ | |
4-AP = 4-Aminophenol, AM = Amperometry, 3-MP = 3-Methoxyphenol, 2-NP = 2-Nitrophenol.
Measurement of 3-MP using modified Fe3O4.CNT NCs/GCE.
| Real samples | Observed current (μA) | Conc. (μM) | SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | R2 | R2 | Average | (n = 3) | ||
| Industrial effluent | 7.09 | 5.27 | 4.91 | 5.75 | 23.76 | 1.17 |
| PC baby bottle | 7.73 | 5.25 | 4.42 | 5.80 | 23.96 | 1.72 |
| PC bottle safa | 1.66 | 4.14 | 3.85 | 3.22 | 13.30 | 1.36 |
| PVC food packaging bag | 4.18 | 3.08 | 2.77 | 3.34 | 13.80 | 0.74 |
| Red sea water | 4.33 | 3.31 | 2.58 | 3.41 | 14.09 | 0.88 |
| Tape water | 3.54 | 2.66 | 2.31 | 2.83 | 11.71 | 0.63 |
R = Reading, SD = Standard deviation
Binding energies of NMs.
| Elements | C1s | O1s | Fe2+ 2p3/2 | Fe3+ 2p3/2 | Fe2+ 2p1/2 | Fe3+ 2p1/2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNT | 285.0 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Fe3O4 NPs | - | 553.0 | 712.0 | 717.0 | 728.0 | 734.0 |
| Fe3O4.CNT NCs | 289.7 | 535.4 | 710.3 | 716.4 | 721.2 | 725.1 |