Reduction of previously reported iminyl radical (ArL)FeCl(•N(C6H4-p-tBu)) (2) with potassium graphite furnished the corresponding high-spin (S = 5/2) imido (ArL)Fe(N(C6H4-p-tBu)) (3) (ArL = 5-mesityl-1,9-(2,4,6-Ph3C6H2)dipyrrin). Oxidation of the three-coordinate imido (ArL)Fe(NAd) (5) with chlorotriphenylmethane afforded (ArL)FeCl(•NAd) (6) with concomitant expulsion of Ph3C(C6H5)CPh2. The respective aryl/alkyl imido/iminyl pairs (3, 2; 5, 6) have been characterized by EPR, zero-field 57Fe Mössbauer, magnetometry, single crystal X-ray diffraction, XAS, and EXAFS for 6. The high-spin (S = 5/2) imidos exhibit characteristically short Fe-N bonds (3: 1.708(4) Å; 5: 1.674(11) Å), whereas the corresponding iminyls exhibit elongated Fe-N bonds (2: 1.768(2) Å; 6: 1.761(6) Å). Comparison of the pre-edge absorption feature (1s → 3d) in the X-ray absorption spectra reveals that the four imido/iminyl complexes share a common iron oxidation level consistent with a ferric formulation (3: 7111.5 eV, 2: 7111.5 eV; 5: 7112.2 eV, 6: 7112.4 eV) as compared with a ferrous amine adduct (ArL)FeCl(NH2Ad) (7: 7110.3 eV). N K-edge X-ray absorption spectra reveal a common low-energy absorption present only for the iminyl species 2 (394.5 eV) and 6 (394.8 eV) that was assigned as a N 1s promotion into a N-localized, singly occupied iminyl orbital. Kinetic analysis of the reaction between the respective iron imido and iminyl complexes with toluene yielded the following activation parameters: Ea (kcal/mol) 3: 12.1, 2: 9.2; 5: 11.5, 6: 7.1. The attenuation of the Fe-N bond interaction on oxidation from an imido to an iminyl complex leads to a reduced enthalpic barrier [Δ(ΔH‡) ≈ 5 kcal/mol]; the alkyl iminyl 6 has a reduced enthalpic barrier (1.84 kcal/mol) as compared with the aryl iminyl 2 (3.84 kcal/mol), consistent with iminyl radical delocalization into the aryl substituent in 2 as compared with 6.
Reduction of previously reported iminyl radical (ArL)FeCl(•n class="Chemical">N(C6H4-p-tBu)) (2) with potassium graphite furnished the corresponding high-spin (S = 5/2) imido(ArL)Fe(N(C6H4-p-tBu)) (3) (ArL = 5-mesityl-1,9-(2,4,6-Ph3C6H2)dipyrrin). Oxidation of the three-coordinate imido (ArL)Fe(NAd) (5) with chlorotriphenylmethane afforded (ArL)FeCl(•NAd) (6) with concomitant expulsion of Ph3C(C6H5)CPh2. The respective aryl/alkyl imido/iminyl pairs (3, 2; 5, 6) have been characterized by EPR, zero-field 57Fe Mössbauer, magnetometry, single crystal X-ray diffraction, XAS, and EXAFS for 6. The high-spin (S = 5/2) imidos exhibit characteristically short Fe-N bonds (3: 1.708(4) Å; 5: 1.674(11) Å), whereas the corresponding iminyls exhibit elongated Fe-N bonds (2: 1.768(2) Å; 6: 1.761(6) Å). Comparison of the pre-edge absorption feature (1s → 3d) in the X-ray absorption spectra reveals that the four imido/iminyl complexes share a common iron oxidation level consistent with a ferric formulation (3: 7111.5 eV, 2: 7111.5 eV; 5: 7112.2 eV, 6: 7112.4 eV) as compared with a ferrous amine adduct (ArL)FeCl(NH2Ad) (7: 7110.3 eV). N K-edge X-ray absorption spectra reveal a common low-energy absorption present only for the iminyl species 2 (394.5 eV) and 6 (394.8 eV) that was assigned as a N 1s promotion into a N-localized, singly occupied iminyl orbital. Kinetic analysis of the reaction between the respective ironimido and iminyl complexes with toluene yielded the following activation parameters: Ea (kcal/mol) 3: 12.1, 2: 9.2; 5: 11.5, 6: 7.1. The attenuation of the Fe-N bond interaction on oxidation from an imido to an iminyl complex leads to a reduced enthalpic barrier [Δ(ΔH‡) ≈ 5 kcal/mol]; the alkyl iminyl 6 has a reduced enthalpic barrier (1.84 kcal/mol) as compared with the aryl iminyl 2 (3.84 kcal/mol), consistent with iminyl radical delocalization into the aryl substituent in 2 as compared with 6.
Authors: Daniel T Shay; Glenn P A Yap; Lev N Zakharov; Arnold L Rheingold; Klaus H Theopold Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2005-02-25 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Nicholas F Chilton; Russell P Anderson; Lincoln D Turner; Alessandro Soncini; Keith S Murray Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: Nathan C Thacker; Zekai Lin; Teng Zhang; James C Gilhula; Carter W Abney; Wenbin Lin Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Petrus F Kuijpers; Martijn J Tiekink; Willem B Breukelaar; Daniël L J Broere; Nicolaas P van Leest; Jarl Ivar van der Vlugt; Joost N H Reek; Bas de Bruin Journal: Chemistry Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Markus R Anneser; Gaya R Elpitiya; Jacob Townsend; Elizabeth J Johnson; Xian B Powers; Joseph F DeJesus; Konstantinos D Vogiatzis; David M Jenkins Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Kurtis M Carsch; James T Lukens; Ida M DiMucci; Diana A Iovan; Shao-Liang Zheng; Kyle M Lancaster; Theodore A Betley Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Kurtis M Carsch; Ida M DiMucci; Diana A Iovan; Alex Li; Shao-Liang Zheng; Charles J Titus; Sang Jun Lee; Kent D Irwin; Dennis Nordlund; Kyle M Lancaster; Theodore A Betley Journal: Science Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Ida M DiMucci; James T Lukens; Sudipta Chatterjee; Kurtis M Carsch; Charles J Titus; Sang Jun Lee; Dennis Nordlund; Theodore A Betley; Samantha N MacMillan; Kyle M Lancaster Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Yuyang Dong; Colton J Lund; Gerard J Porter; Ryan M Clarke; Shao-Liang Zheng; Thomas R Cundari; Theodore A Betley Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 16.383