Alessandro Rabiolo1, Riccardo Sacconi2, Chiara Giuffrè1, Eleonora Corbelli1, Adriano Carnevali1, Lea Querques1, David Sarraf3, K Bailey Freund4,5, SriniVas Sadda6,7, Francesco Bandello1, Giuseppe Querques1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. 2. Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. 3. Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 4. Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, New York. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York. 6. Doheny Image Reading Center, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California. 7. Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report a case of factitious self-inflicted handheld laser-induced maculopathy. METHODS: A 29-year-old man presented to our clinic complaining of a step-wise progressive loss of vision that abruptly began in his left eye but then became bilateral. He underwent comprehensive ocular examination, including visual acuity testing, biomicroscopic, dilated funduscopic examination, structural optical coherence tomography, en face structural optical coherence tomography, optical coherence tomography angiography, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography. RESULTS: Visual acuity was 20/200 in both eyes. Although the multimodal imaging was highly consistent with handheld laser-induced maculopathy, the patient continued to deny this behavior. CONCLUSION: Self-inflicted handheld laser-induced maculopathy may be a novel manifestation of factitious disorder. Clinical suspicion for this should remain high in the presence of the signature multimodal retinal findings despite denial by the patient. This category of patients could benefit from psychiatric referral, to prevent further ocular or extra-ocular self-injury.
PURPOSE: To report a case of factitious self-inflicted handheld laser-induced maculopathy. METHODS: A 29-year-old man presented to our clinic complaining of a step-wise progressive loss of vision that abruptly began in his left eye but then became bilateral. He underwent comprehensive ocular examination, including visual acuity testing, biomicroscopic, dilated funduscopic examination, structural optical coherence tomography, en face structural optical coherence tomography, optical coherence tomography angiography, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography. RESULTS: Visual acuity was 20/200 in both eyes. Although the multimodal imaging was highly consistent with handheld laser-induced maculopathy, the patient continued to deny this behavior. CONCLUSION: Self-inflicted handheld laser-induced maculopathy may be a novel manifestation of factitious disorder. Clinical suspicion for this should remain high in the presence of the signature multimodal retinal findings despite denial by the patient. This category of patients could benefit from psychiatric referral, to prevent further ocular or extra-ocular self-injury.