Literature DB >> 28936806

Simultaneous application of cisplatin and static magnetic field enhances oxidative stress in HeLa cell line.

Samaneh Kamalipooya1, Parviz Abdolmaleki2, Zahra Salemi2, Fatemeh Javani Jouni3, Jaber Zafari4, Homa Soleimani5.   

Abstract

In this study, we reported the effects of simultaneous application of static magnetic field (SMF) and cisplatin as an anticancer drug on the oxidative stress in human cervical cancer (HeLa) cell line and normal skin fibroblast cells (Hu02). The cells were exposed to different SMF intensities (7, 10, and 15 mT) for 24 and 48 h. IC50 concentrations of cisplatin were obtained by MTT assay. The cytotoxic effects of combined treatment were studied by measuring the intracellular reactive oxygen species content using flow cytometric method and estimation of membrane lipid peroxidation by spectrophotometry. Statistical analysis was assessed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's test. Based on the obtained results, the highest and lowest death rate, respectively, in HeLa and Hu02 cell lines was observed at the intensity of 10 mT. Also, we found that membrane lipid peroxidation in cancer cells is higher than that of normal counterparts. SMF potently sensitized human cervical cancer cells to cisplatin through reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation while it had small effects on normal cells. The combination of both treatments for 48 h led to a marked decrease in the viability percentage of HeLa cells by about 89% compared to untreated cells. This study suggests that conjugation of both physical and chemical treatments could increase the oxidative stress in HeLa cell line and among three optional intensities of SMF, the intensity of 10 mT led to the higher damage to cancer cells in lower doses of drug.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cisplatin; HeLa cell line; Lipid peroxidation; Reactive oxygen species; Static magnetic field; Viability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28936806     DOI: 10.1007/s11626-017-0148-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim        ISSN: 1071-2690            Impact factor:   2.416


  33 in total

1.  Investigation on the effect of static magnetic field up to 30 mT on viability percent, proliferation rate and IC50 of HeLa and fibroblast cells.

Authors:  Jaber Zafari; Fatemeh Javani Jouni; Parviz Abdolmaleki; Amir Jalali; Mohammad Javad Khodayar
Journal:  Electromagn Biol Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Bioeffects of moderate-intensity static magnetic fields on cell cultures.

Authors:  Luciana Dini; Luigi Abbro
Journal:  Micron       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 2.251

3.  Role of exchange and dipolar interactions in the radical pair model of the avian magnetic compass.

Authors:  Olga Efimova; P J Hore
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Cellular ATP content was decreased by a homogeneous 8.5 T static magnetic field exposure: role of reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Guoping Zhao; Shaopeng Chen; Lei Wang; Ye Zhao; Jun Wang; Xiaofei Wang; Wenwen Zhang; Ruqun Wu; Lijun Wu; Yuejin Wu; An Xu
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.010

Review 5.  Molecular aspects of the plasma membrane in tumor cells.

Authors:  K Kojima
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.131

Review 6.  Biological responses to electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  A Lacy-Hulbert; J C Metcalfe; R Hesketh
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Improvement of cisplatin-induced injuries to sperm quality, the oxidant-antioxidant system, and the histologic structure of the rat testis by ellagic acid.

Authors:  Gaffari Türk; Ahmet Ateşşahin; Mustafa Sönmez; Ali Osman Ceribaşi; Abdurrauf Yüce
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  Bioeffects of static magnetic fields: oxidative stress, genotoxic effects, and cancer studies.

Authors:  Soumaya Ghodbane; Aida Lahbib; Mohsen Sakly; Hafedh Abdelmelek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The influence of static magnetic fields on canine and equine mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissue.

Authors:  Monika Marędziak; Krzysztof Marycz; Agnieszka Smieszek; Daniel Lewandowski; Nezir Yaşar Toker
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 10.  Metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells: glycolysis, glutaminolysis, and Bcl-2 proteins as novel therapeutic targets for cancer.

Authors:  Chunxia Li; Guifeng Zhang; Lei Zhao; Zhijun Ma; Hongbing Chen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  4 in total

1.  Induction of apoptosis and ferroptosis by a tumor suppressing magnetic field through ROS-mediated DNA damage.

Authors:  Lin-Qing Yuan; Can Wang; Dong-Fang Lu; Xia-Di Zhao; Lin-Hua Tan; Xi Chen
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 2.  Progressive Study on the Non-thermal Effects of Magnetic Field Therapy in Oncology.

Authors:  Aoshu Xu; Qian Wang; Xin Lv; Tingting Lin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Magnetic field effects in biology from the perspective of the radical pair mechanism.

Authors:  Hadi Zadeh-Haghighi; Christoph Simon
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.293

4.  Towards Imaging Pt Chemoresistance Using Gd(III)-Pt(II) Theranostic MR Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Casey J Adams; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.466

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.