Literature DB >> 28936795

The Ugly Truth About Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social Inequity.

Ayanna Howard1, Jason Borenstein2.   

Abstract

Recently, there has been an upsurge of attention focused on bias and its impact on specialized artificial intelligence (AI) applications. Allegations of racism and sexism have permeated the conversation as stories surface about search engines delivering job postings for well-paying technical jobs to men and not women, or providing arrest mugshots when keywords such as "black teenagers" are entered. Learning algorithms are evolving; they are often created from parsing through large datasets of online information while having truth labels bestowed on them by crowd-sourced masses. These specialized AI algorithms have been liberated from the minds of researchers and startups, and released onto the public. Yet intelligent though they may be, these algorithms maintain some of the same biases that permeate society. They find patterns within datasets that reflect implicit biases and, in so doing, emphasize and reinforce these biases as global truth. This paper describes specific examples of how bias has infused itself into current AI and robotic systems, and how it may affect the future design of such systems. More specifically, we draw attention to how bias may affect the functioning of (1) a robot peacekeeper, (2) a self-driving car, and (3) a medical robot. We conclude with an overview of measures that could be taken to mitigate or halt bias from permeating robotic technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Design ethics; Implicit bias; Professional ethics; Robot ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28936795     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9975-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  7 in total

1.  Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research.

Authors:  David Chavalarias; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The evolution of error: error management, cognitive constraints, and adaptive decision-making biases.

Authors:  Dominic D P Johnson; Daniel T Blumstein; James H Fowler; Martie G Haselton
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Salary differences between male and female registered nurses in the United States.

Authors:  Ulrike Muench; Jody Sindelar; Susan H Busch; Peter I Buerhaus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015 Mar 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases.

Authors:  Aylin Caliskan; Joanna J Bryson; Arvind Narayanan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Implicit Racial/Ethnic Bias Among Health Care Professionals and Its Influence on Health Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  William J Hall; Mimi V Chapman; Kent M Lee; Yesenia M Merino; Tainayah W Thomas; B Keith Payne; Eugenia Eng; Steven H Day; Tamera Coyne-Beasley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children's interests.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Sarah-Jane Leslie; Andrei Cimpian
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients.

Authors:  Alexander R Green; Dana R Carney; Daniel J Pallin; Long H Ngo; Kristal L Raymond; Lisa I Iezzoni; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 5.128

  7 in total
  13 in total

1.  Social robotics and the modulation of social perception and bias.

Authors:  Joshua Skewes; David M Amodio; Johanna Seibt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Ageism and Artificial Intelligence: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Charlene H Chu; Kathleen Leslie; Jiamin Shi; Rune Nyrup; Andria Bianchi; Shehroz S Khan; Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi; Alexandra Lyn; Amanda Grenier
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-06-09

3.  Five sources of bias in natural language processing.

Authors:  Dirk Hovy; Shrimai Prabhumoye
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2021-08-20

4.  Trust and medical AI: the challenges we face and the expertise needed to overcome them.

Authors:  Thomas P Quinn; Manisha Senadeera; Stephan Jacobs; Simon Coghlan; Vuong Le
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Robotic technology for palliative and supportive care: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.

Authors:  Amara Callistus Nwosu; Bethany Sturgeon; Tamsin McGlinchey; Christian Dg Goodwin; Ardhendu Behera; Stephen Mason; Sarah Stanley; Terry R Payne
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Flexible Efficient Cognition for Persistent Sustainable Production.

Authors:  Stephen Fox; Adrian Kotelba
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.524

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature.

Authors:  Kathleen Murphy; Erica Di Ruggiero; Ross Upshur; Donald J Willison; Neha Malhotra; Jia Ce Cai; Nakul Malhotra; Vincci Lui; Jennifer Gibson
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  The design of Lil'Flo, a socially assistive robot for upper extremity motor assessment and rehabilitation in the community via telepresence.

Authors:  Michael J Sobrepera; Vera G Lee; Michelle J Johnson
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2021-04-19

9.  A World Full of Stereotypes? Further Investigation on Origin and Gender Bias in Multi-Lingual Word Embeddings.

Authors:  Mascha Kurpicz-Briki; Tomaso Leoni
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2021-06-03

10.  Questioning Racial and Gender Bias in AI-based Recommendations: Do Espoused National Cultural Values Matter?

Authors:  Manjul Gupta; Carlos M Parra; Denis Dennehy
Journal:  Inf Syst Front       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 6.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.