Literature DB >> 28936684

Kinematics of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to native: results from an in vitro study.

Geert Peersman1,2, Josh Slane3, Philippe Vuylsteke4, Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann5, Philipp Dworschak5, Thomas Heyse5, Lennart Scheys3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) closely replicates native knee kinematics. As few studies have assessed kinematics following mobile-bearing (MB) UKA, the current study aimed to investigate whether MB UKA preserves natural knee kinematics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven fresh-frozen full-leg cadaver specimens were prepared and mounted in a kinematic rig that allowed all degrees of freedom at the knee. Three motion patterns, passive flexion-extension (0°-110° flexion), open-chain extension (5°-70° flexion) and squatting (30°-100° flexion), were performed pre- and post-implantation of a medial MB UKA and compared in terms of rotational and translational knee joint kinematics in the different anatomical planes, respectively.
RESULTS: In terms of frontal plane rotational kinematics, MB UKA specimens were in a more valgus orientation for all motion patterns. In the axial plane, internal rotation of the tibia before and after UKA was consistent, regardless of motion task, with no significant differences. In terms of frontal plane, i.e., inferior-superior, translations, the FMCC was significantly higher in UKA knees in all flexion angles and motor tasks, except in early flexion during passive motion. In terms of axial plane, i.e., anteroposterior (AP), translations, during open-chain activities, the femoral medial condyle center (FMCC) tended to be more posterior following UKA relative to the native knee in mid-flexion and above. AP excursions of the FMCC were small in all tested motions, however. There was substantial AP translation of the femoral lateral condyle center during passive motion before and after UKA, which was significantly different for flexion angles > 38°.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study data demonstrate that the kinematics of the unloaded knee following MB UKA closely resemble those of the native knee while relative medial overstuffing with UKA will result in the joint being more valgus. However, replacing the conforming and rigidly fixed medial meniscus with a mobile inlay may successfully prevent aberrant posterior translation of the medial femoral compartment during passive motion and squatting motion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Knee kinematics; Mobile-bearing; Unicondylar knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28936684     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2794-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  14 in total

1.  Anatomy-mimetic design preserves natural kinematics of knee joint in patient-specific mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Jin-Ah Lee; Hwa-Yong Lee; Heoung-Jae Chun; Hyo-Jeong Kim; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Weight-bearing status affects in vivo kinematics following mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kenichi Kono; Hiroshi Inui; Tetsuya Tomita; Takaharu Yamazaki; Shuji Taketomi; Ryota Yamagami; Kohei Kawaguchi; Kazuomi Sugamoto; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Comparison of implant position and joint awareness between fixed- and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a minimum of five year follow-up study.

Authors:  Man Soo Kim; In Jun Koh; Chul Kyu Kim; Keun Young Choi; Jong Won Baek; Yong In
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Comparison of the effectiveness of unicompartmental arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty based on patient scale data].

Authors:  Xiangyu Zu; Jun Wang; Ming Lu; Zongsheng Yin
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-12-15

5.  Mobile bearing versus fixed bearing medial unicompartmental knee replacement: an independent two center matched-pairs analysis.

Authors:  Mustafa Hariri; Georg Hauer; Maria Smolle; Patrick Sadoghi; Andreas Leithner; Benjamin Panzram; Christian Merle; Tobias Renkawitz; Tilman Walker
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 2.928

6.  Kinematic Alignment Bi-unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty With Oxford Partial Knees: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Takafumi Hiranaka; Takaaki Fujishiro; Motoki Koide; Koji Okamoto
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-29

7.  Kinematic alignment of medial UKA is safe: a systematic review.

Authors:  Charles Rivière; Sivan Sivaloganathan; Loic Villet; Philippe Cartier; Sébastien Lustig; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Justin Cobb
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Does Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Affect Tibial Bone Strain? A Paired Cadaveric Comparison of Fixed- and Mobile-bearing Designs.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Orcun Taylan; Joshua Slane; Ben Vanthienen; Jeroen Verhaegen; Lyne Anthonissen; G Harry van Lenthe; Thomas Heyse; Lennart Scheys
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Limb position influences component orientation in Oxford mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an experimental cadaveric study.

Authors:  Sachin Tapasvi; Anshu Shekhar; Shantanu Patil; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Effect of tibial component alignment on knee kinematics and ligament tension in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K Sekiguchi; S Nakamura; S Kuriyama; K Nishitani; H Ito; Y Tanaka; M Watanabe; S Matsuda
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.