M Mar Fernandez1, Alejandro González-Castro2, Monica Magret3, M Teresa Bouza4, Marcos Ibañez5, Carolina García6, Begoña Balerdi7, Arantxa Mas8, Vanesa Arauzo9, José M Añón10, Francisco Ruiz11, José Ferreres12, Roser Tomás13, Marta Alabert14, Ana Isabel Tizón15, Susana Altaba16, Noemi Llamas17, Rafael Fernandez18. 1. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Universitat de Barcelona, Terrassa, Spain. marufaes@yahoo.es. 2. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain. 3. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain. 4. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital de A Coruña, Coruña, Spain. 5. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Verge de la Cinta de Tortosa, Tarragona, Spain. 6. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain. 7. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain. 8. Department of Intensive Care, Consorci Sanitari Integral Moisés Broggi, Barcelona, Spain. 9. Department of Intensive Care, Consorci Hospitalari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain. 10. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario La Paz-Carlos III. IdiPAZ. CIBERES, Madrid, Spain. 11. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Médico-quirúrgico de Jaén, Jaén, Spain. 12. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Clínico de Valencia, Valencia, Spain. 13. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital General de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain. 14. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital General de Vic, Barcelona, Spain. 15. Department of Intensive Care, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain. 16. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón, Spain. 17. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario Rafael Méndez, Lorca, Murcia, Spain. 18. Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Sant Joan de Dèu -Fundació Althaia, CIBERES, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Manresa, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) can be exhausting, but the preventive role of rest has never been studied. This study aimed to evaluate whether reconnection to mechanical ventilation (MV) for 1 h after the effort of a successful SBT could reduce the need for reintubation in critically ill patients. METHODS: Randomized multicenter trial conducted in 17 Spanish medical-surgical intensive care units (Oct 2013-Jan 2015). Patients under MV for longer than 12 h who fulfilled criteria for planned extubation were randomly allocated after a successful SBT to direct extubation (control group) or reconnection to the ventilator for a 1-h rest before extubation (rest group). The primary outcome was reintubation within 48 h. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: We recruited 243 patients randomized to the control group and 227 to the rest group. Median time from intubation to SBT did not differ between groups [5.5 (2.7, 9.6) days in the control group vs. 5.7 (2.7, 10.6) in the rest group; p = 0.85]. Reintubation within 48 h after extubation was more common in the control than in the rest group [35 (14%) vs. 12 (5%) patients; OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.16-0.65; p < 0.001]. A multivariable regression model demonstrated that the variables independently associated with reintubation were rest [OR 0.34 (95%CI 0.17-0.68)], APACHE II [OR 1.04 (1.002-1.077)], and days of MV before SBT [OR 1.04 (1.001-1.073)], whereas age, reason for admission, and type and duration of SBT were not. CONCLUSION: One-hour rest after a successful SBT reduced the rates of reintubation within 48 h after extubation in critically ill patients. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01915563.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) can be exhausting, but the preventive role of rest has never been studied. This study aimed to evaluate whether reconnection to mechanical ventilation (MV) for 1 h after the effort of a successful SBT could reduce the need for reintubation in critically illpatients. METHODS: Randomized multicenter trial conducted in 17 Spanish medical-surgical intensive care units (Oct 2013-Jan 2015). Patients under MV for longer than 12 h who fulfilled criteria for planned extubation were randomly allocated after a successful SBT to direct extubation (control group) or reconnection to the ventilator for a 1-h rest before extubation (rest group). The primary outcome was reintubation within 48 h. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: We recruited 243 patients randomized to the control group and 227 to the rest group. Median time from intubation to SBT did not differ between groups [5.5 (2.7, 9.6) days in the control group vs. 5.7 (2.7, 10.6) in the rest group; p = 0.85]. Reintubation within 48 h after extubation was more common in the control than in the rest group [35 (14%) vs. 12 (5%) patients; OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.16-0.65; p < 0.001]. A multivariable regression model demonstrated that the variables independently associated with reintubation were rest [OR 0.34 (95%CI 0.17-0.68)], APACHE II [OR 1.04 (1.002-1.077)], and days of MV before SBT [OR 1.04 (1.001-1.073)], whereas age, reason for admission, and type and duration of SBT were not. CONCLUSION: One-hour rest after a successful SBT reduced the rates of reintubation within 48 h after extubation in critically illpatients. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01915563.
Authors: A Esteban; I Alía; M J Tobin; A Gil; F Gordo; I Vallverdú; L Blanch; A Bonet; A Vázquez; R de Pablo; A Torres; M A de La Cal; S Macías Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Arnaud W Thille; Florence Boissier; Hassen Ben Ghezala; Keyvan Razazi; Armand Mekontso-Dessap; Christian Brun-Buisson Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Miquel Ferrer; Antonio Esquinas; Francisco Arancibia; Torsten Thomas Bauer; Gumersindo Gonzalez; Andres Carrillo; Robert Rodriguez-Roisin; Antoni Torres Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-04-10 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Gonzalo Hernández; Concepción Vaquero; Laura Colinas; Rafael Cuena; Paloma González; Alfonso Canabal; Susana Sanchez; Maria Luisa Rodriguez; Ana Villasclaras; Rafael Fernández Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A Esteban; F Frutos; M J Tobin; I Alía; J F Solsona; I Valverdú; R Fernández; M A de la Cal; S Benito; R Tomás Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1995-02-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrés Esteban; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Niall D Ferguson; Yaseen Arabi; Carlos Apezteguía; Marco González; Scott K Epstein; Nicholas S Hill; Stefano Nava; Marco-Antonio Soares; Gabriel D'Empaire; Inmaculada Alía; Antonio Anzueto Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Quentin Cherel; Dominique Prat; Benjamin Sztrymf; M Mar Fernandez; Rafael Fernandez Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Kazuya Kikutani; Shinichiro Ohshimo; Nobuaki Shime; Maria Del Mar Fernandez; Rafael Fernandez Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Zhong-Hua Shi; Annemijn H Jonkman; Pieter Roel Tuinman; Guang-Qiang Chen; Ming Xu; Yan-Lin Yang; Leo M A Heunks; Jian-Xin Zhou Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2021-04
Authors: Karen E A Burns; Ibrahim Soliman; Neill K J Adhikari; Amer Zwein; Jessica T Y Wong; Carolina Gomez-Builes; Jose Augusto Pellegrini; Lu Chen; Nuttapol Rittayamai; Michael Sklar; Laurent J Brochard; Jan O Friedrich Journal: Crit Care Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 9.097