Literature DB >> 28936543

US LI-RADS: ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system for screening and surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Tara A Morgan1, Katherine E Maturen2, Nirvikar Dahiya3, Maryellen R M Sun4, Aya Kamaya5.   

Abstract

Ultrasound is the most widely used imaging tool for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening and surveillance. Until now, this method has lacked standardized guidelines for interpretation, reporting, and management recommendations [1-5]. To address this need, the American College of Radiology (ACR) has developed the Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (US LI-RADS) algorithm. The proposed algorithm has two components: detection scores and visualization scores. The detection score guides management and has three categories: US-1 Negative, US-2 Subthreshold, and US-3 Positive. The visualization score informs the expected sensitivity of the ultrasound examination and also has three categories: Visualization A: No or minimal limitations; Visualization B: Moderate limitations; and Visualization C: Severe limitations. Standardization in ultrasound utilization, reporting, and management in high-risk individuals has the capacity to improve communication with patients and referring physicians, unify screening and surveillance algorithms, impact outcomes, and supply quantitative data for future research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma; LI-RADS; Screening; Surveillance; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28936543     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1317-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  16 in total

Review 1.  Joint Consensus Statement of the Indian National Association for Study of the Liver and Indian Radiological and Imaging Association for the Diagnosis and Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incorporating Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Authors:  Sonal Krishan; Radha K Dhiman; Navin Kalra; Raju Sharma; Sanjay S Baijal; Anil Arora; Ajay Gulati; Anu Eapan; Ashish Verma; Shyam Keshava; Amar Mukund; S Deva; Ravi Chaudhary; Karthick Ganesan; Sunil Taneja; Ujjwal Gorsi; Shivanand Gamanagatti; Kumble S Madhusudan; Pankaj Puri; Shallini Govil; Manav Wadhavan; Sanjiv Saigal; Ashish Kumar; Shallini Thapar; Ajay Duseja; Neeraj Saraf; Anubhav Khandelwal; Sumit Mukhopadyay; Ajay Gulati; Nitin Shetty; Nipun Verma
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2019-08-06

2.  A Scalable Machine Learning Approach for Inferring Probabilistic US-LI-RADS Categorization.

Authors:  Imon Banerjee; Hailye H Choi; Terry Desser; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 3.  Up-to-Date Role of CT/MRI LI-RADS in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Guilherme Moura Cunha; Victoria Chernyak; Kathryn J Fowler; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2021-05-31

4.  Associations of Ultrasound LI-RADS Visualization Score With Examination, Sonographer, and Radiologist Factors: Retrospective Assessment in Over 10,000 Examinations.

Authors:  David T Fetzer; Travis Browning; Yin Xi; Takeshi Yokoo; Amit G Singal
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.582

Review 5.  Role of US LI-RADS in the LI-RADS Algorithm.

Authors:  Shuchi K Rodgers; David T Fetzer; Helena Gabriel; James H Seow; Hailey H Choi; Katherine E Maturen; Ashish P Wasnik; Tara A Morgan; Nirvikar Dahiya; Mary K O'Boyle; Yuko Kono; Claude B Sirlin; Aya Kamaya
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Victoria Chernyak; Kathryn J Fowler; Aya Kamaya; Ania Z Kielar; Khaled M Elsayes; Mustafa R Bashir; Yuko Kono; Richard K Do; Donald G Mitchell; Amit G Singal; An Tang; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Application of new ultrasound techniques for focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Feiqian Wang; Kazushi Numata; Hiromi Nihonmatsu; Masahiro Okada; Shin Maeda
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 8.  Rational HCC screening approaches for patients with NAFLD.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  Non-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Ultrasound as a Surveillance Tool for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Not all that glitters is gold: the ultrasound hepatologist's point of view.

Authors:  Antonio Giorgio; Massimo De Luca; Pietro Gatti; Valentina Giorgio
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-01-03

10.  Screening is associated with a lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma-related mortality in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Feng Su; Noel S Weiss; Lauren A Beste; Andrew M Moon; Ga-Young Jin; Pamela Green; Kristin Berry; George N Ioannou
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 25.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.