Maria Mercedes Santoro1, Domenico Di Carlo1, Daniele Armenia1, Mauro Zaccarelli2, Carmela Pinnetti2, Manuela Colafigli3, Francesca Prati4, Andrea Boschi5, Anna Maria Degli Antoni6, Filippo Lagi7, Laura Sighinolfi8, Cristina Gervasoni9, Massimo Andreoni10, Andrea Antinori2, Cristina Mussini11, Carlo Federico Perno12, Vanni Borghi11, Gaetana Sterrantino7. 1. Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy. 2. Infectious Diseases Division, National Institute for Infectious Diseases L Spallanzani (IRCCS), Rome, Italy. 3. Clinic of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases, San Gallicano Dermatologic Institute (IRCCS), Rome, Italy. 4. Infectious Diseases Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy. 5. Infectious Diseases Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rimini, Rimini, Italy. 6. Infectious Diseases Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy. 7. Department of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy. 8. Infectious Diseases Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. 9. Section of Infectious Diseases, L Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy. 10. Department of Medicine of Systems, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy. 11. Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy. 12. Antiretroviral Drugs Monitoring Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases L Spallanzani (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Virological success (VS) and immunological reconstitution (IR) of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients with pre-therapy viral load (VL) >500,000 copies/ml was assessed after 12 months of treatment according to initial drug-class regimens. METHODS: An observational multicentre retrospective study was performed. VS was defined as the first VL <50 copies/ml from treatment start. IR was defined as an increase of at least 150 CD4+ T-lymphocytes from treatment start. Survival analysis was used to estimate the probability and predictors of VS and IR by 12 months of therapy. RESULTS: 428 HIV-1-infected patients were analysed. Patients were grouped according to the different first-line drug-classes used: a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs; NNRTI-group; n=105 [24.5%]); a protease inhibitor (PI) plus two NRTIs (PI-group; n=260 [60.8%]); a four-drug regimen containing a PI-regimen plus an integrase inhibitor (PI+INI-group; n=63 [14.7%]). Patients in the PI-group showed the lowest probability of VS (PI-group: 72.4%; NNRTI-group: 75.5%; PI+INI-group: 81.0%; P<0.0001). By Cox regression, patients in PI+INI and NNRTI-groups showed a higher adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of VS compared to those in the PI-group (PI+INI-group: 1.48 [1.08, 2.03]; P=0.014; NNRTI-group: 1.37 [1.06-1.78]; P=0.015). The probability of IR was 76.2%, and was similar among groups. Patients with AIDS showed a lower adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of IR compared to non-AIDS presenters (0.70 [0.54, 0.90]; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicentre retrospective study, patients with viraemia >500,000 copies/ml who start a first-line regimen containing PI+INI or NNRTI yield a better VS compared to those receiving a PI-based regimen.
BACKGROUND: Virological success (VS) and immunological reconstitution (IR) of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infectedpatients with pre-therapy viral load (VL) >500,000 copies/ml was assessed after 12 months of treatment according to initial drug-class regimens. METHODS: An observational multicentre retrospective study was performed. VS was defined as the first VL <50 copies/ml from treatment start. IR was defined as an increase of at least 150 CD4+ T-lymphocytes from treatment start. Survival analysis was used to estimate the probability and predictors of VS and IR by 12 months of therapy. RESULTS: 428 HIV-1-infectedpatients were analysed. Patients were grouped according to the different first-line drug-classes used: a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs; NNRTI-group; n=105 [24.5%]); a protease inhibitor (PI) plus two NRTIs (PI-group; n=260 [60.8%]); a four-drug regimen containing a PI-regimen plus an integrase inhibitor (PI+INI-group; n=63 [14.7%]). Patients in the PI-group showed the lowest probability of VS (PI-group: 72.4%; NNRTI-group: 75.5%; PI+INI-group: 81.0%; P<0.0001). By Cox regression, patients in PI+INI and NNRTI-groups showed a higher adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of VS compared to those in the PI-group (PI+INI-group: 1.48 [1.08, 2.03]; P=0.014; NNRTI-group: 1.37 [1.06-1.78]; P=0.015). The probability of IR was 76.2%, and was similar among groups. Patients with AIDS showed a lower adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of IR compared to non-AIDS presenters (0.70 [0.54, 0.90]; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicentre retrospective study, patients with viraemia >500,000 copies/ml who start a first-line regimen containing PI+INI or NNRTI yield a better VS compared to those receiving a PI-based regimen.
Authors: Marek Widera; Miriam Dirks; Barbara Bleekmann; Robert Jablonka; Martin Däumer; Hauke Walter; Robert Ehret; Jens Verheyen; Stefan Esser Journal: Med Microbiol Immunol Date: 2017-02-20 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Anthony M Mills; Kathy L Schulman; Jennifer S Fusco; Michael B Wohlfeiler; Julie L Priest; Alan Oglesby; Laurence Brunet; Philip C Lackey; Gregory P Fusco Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 3.835