Anders Henningsen1, Ralf Smeets2, Kai Köppen3, Susanne Sehner4, Frank Kornmann5, Alexander Gröbe6, Max Heiland7, Till Gerlach8. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: a.henningsen@uke.de. 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: r.smeets@uke.de. 3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: kaikoeppen@hotmail.com. 4. Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: s.sehner@uke.uni-hamburg.de. 5. Private Practice for Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Oppenheim, Germany. Electronic address: kornmann@kornmann-gerlach.de. 6. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Diakovere Henriettenstift Hospital, Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: alexander.groebe@diakovere.de. 7. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: max.heiland@charite.de. 8. Private Practice for Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Oppenheim, Germany. Electronic address: gerlach@kornmann-gerlach.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Immediate loading of dental implants has been evolving into an appropriate procedure for the treatment of partially edentulous jaws. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical success and radiological outcome of immediately and delayed loaded dental implants in anterior and premolar sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, data of 163 individuals requiring tooth removal with subsequent implant placement in anterior and premolar sites were analyzed. Implants were immediately loaded by provisional acrylic resin bridges or loaded with delay. Implants were followed up annually for up to 9 years including intraoral radiographs. RESULTS: A total of 285 implants in 163 patients were placed. 218 implants were immediately loaded and 67 implants with delay. Fifteen implants failed during the follow-up period resulting in survival rates of 94.5% for immediate loading and 95.5% for delayed loading. After an initial decrease of 0.3 mm in the first 12 months the marginal bone level remained stable. No statistically significant differences were found in marginal bone loss between immediately and delayed loaded implants (P = 0.518, 95% CI). CONCLUSION: Within the limits of this study, immediate loading of immediately subcrestally placed dental implants in anterior and premolar sites is a reliable treatment option for dental rehabilitation.
PURPOSE: Immediate loading of dental implants has been evolving into an appropriate procedure for the treatment of partially edentulous jaws. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical success and radiological outcome of immediately and delayed loaded dental implants in anterior and premolar sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, data of 163 individuals requiring tooth removal with subsequent implant placement in anterior and premolar sites were analyzed. Implants were immediately loaded by provisional acrylic resin bridges or loaded with delay. Implants were followed up annually for up to 9 years including intraoral radiographs. RESULTS: A total of 285 implants in 163 patients were placed. 218 implants were immediately loaded and 67 implants with delay. Fifteen implants failed during the follow-up period resulting in survival rates of 94.5% for immediate loading and 95.5% for delayed loading. After an initial decrease of 0.3 mm in the first 12 months the marginal bone level remained stable. No statistically significant differences were found in marginal bone loss between immediately and delayed loaded implants (P = 0.518, 95% CI). CONCLUSION: Within the limits of this study, immediate loading of immediately subcrestally placed dental implants in anterior and premolar sites is a reliable treatment option for dental rehabilitation.
Authors: Linna Guo; Ralf Smeets; Lan Kluwe; Philip Hartjen; Mike Barbeck; Claudio Cacaci; Martin Gosau; Anders Henningsen Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 5.923