| Literature DB >> 28935363 |
Katherine R O'Brien1, Michelle Waycott2, Paul Maxwell3, Gary A Kendrick4, James W Udy5, Angus J P Ferguson6, Kieryn Kilminster7, Peter Scanes6, Len J McKenzie8, Kathryn McMahon9, Matthew P Adams10, Jimena Samper-Villarreal11, Catherine Collier8, Mitchell Lyons12, Peter J Mumby13, Lynda Radke14, Marjolijn J A Christianen15, William C Dennison16.
Abstract
Seagrass ecosystems are inherently dynamic, responding to environmental change across a range of scales. Habitat requirements of seagrass are well defined, but less is known about their ability to resist disturbance. Specific means of recovery after loss are particularly difficult to quantify. Here we assess the resistance and recovery capacity of 12 seagrass genera. We document four classic trajectories of degradation and recovery for seagrass ecosystems, illustrated with examples from around the world. Recovery can be rapid once conditions improve, but seagrass absence at landscape scales may persist for many decades, perpetuated by feedbacks and/or lack of seed or plant propagules to initiate recovery. It can be difficult to distinguish between slow recovery, recalcitrant degradation, and the need for a window of opportunity to trigger recovery. We propose a framework synthesizing how the spatial and temporal scales of both disturbance and seagrass response affect ecosystem trajectory and hence resilience.Keywords: Colonizing; Opportunistic; Persistent; Recovery; Resilience; Resistance; Seagrass; Trajectory
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28935363 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.09.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Pollut Bull ISSN: 0025-326X Impact factor: 5.553