Literature DB >> 28935185

Impact of hospital case volume on testicular cancer outcomes and practice patterns.

Solomon L Woldu1, Justin T Matulay2, Timothy N Clinton1, Nirmish Singla1, Laura-Maria Krabbe1, Ryan C Hutchinson1, Arthur Sagalowsky1, Yair Lotan1, Vitaly Margulis1, Aditya Bagrodia3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the rarity of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) and the complex aspects of management, we evaluate the effect of hospital TGCT case volume on overall survival outcomes and practice patterns.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with seminoma or nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT). Hospitals were classified by case volume as high (99th percentile, ≥26.1 cases annually), high-intermediate (95-99th percentile, 14.6-26.0 cases annually), intermediate (75-95th percentile, 6.1-14.5 cases annually), low-intermediate (25-75th percentile, 1.8-6.0 cases annually), and low (25th percentile,<1.8 cases annually). The median (interquartile range) number of TGCT cases per institution per year was 3.4 (1.8-6.1).
RESULTS: A total of 33,417 patients with TGCT diagnosed from 1,239 institutions met inclusion criteria. Despite worse disease characteristics of patients treated at higher volume institutions, hospital volume was positively associated with survival outcomes in more advanced cases of TGCT. In the overall cohort, compared to the high-volume hospitals, patients treated at high-intermediate, intermediate, low-intermediate, and low volume hospitals the hazard ratio for overall mortality was 1.28, 1.45, 1.48, and 1.83, respectively (P<0.05). The association between survival and hospital volume was not apparent for seminoma or stage I NSGCT. Patients treated at higher volume hospitals were more likely to undergo surveillance for stage I seminoma, primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for stage I NSGCT, and postchemotherapy RPLND for stage II/III NSGCT.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of a nationwide cancer registry demonstrated that increased hospital TGCT case volume was associated with significant differences in management strategies and improved survival outcomes, in particular for more advanced disease.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centralization; Outcomes; Testicular cancer; Treatment; Volume

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28935185     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  16 in total

1.  Factors Associated With Receipt of Partial Nephrectomy or Minimally Invasive Surgery for Patients With Clinical T1a and T1b Renal Masses: Implications for Regionalization of Care.

Authors:  Joshua Sterling; Zorimar Rivera-Núñez; Hiren V Patel; Nicholas J Farber; Sinae Kim; Kushan D Radadia; Parth K Modi; Sharad Goyal; Rahul Parikh; Robert E Weiss; Isaac Y Kim; Sammy E Elsamra; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.872

2.  Site of extranodal metastasis impacts survival in patients with testicular germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Nirmish Singla; Rashed A Ghandour; Yuval Freifeld; Joseph G Cheaib; Solomon L Woldu; Phillip M Pierorazio; Aditya Bagrodia
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Mediastinal germ cell tumours: where we are and where we are going-a narrative review.

Authors:  Laura Marandino; Ursula Maria Vogl
Journal:  Mediastinum       Date:  2022-03-25

4.  Treatment at an Inexperienced Center Suggests Worse Prognosis of Metastatic Germ Cell Tumors.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yaegashi; Kouji Izumi; Suguru Kadomoto; Hiroaki Iwamoto; Masashi Iijima; Shohei Kawaguchi; Takahiro Nohara; Kazuyoshi Shigehara; Yoshifumi Kadono; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2021-03-03

5.  Canadian Urological Association consensus guideline: Management of testicular germ cell cancer.

Authors:  Robert J Hamilton; Christina Canil; Noa Shani Shrem; Kopika Kuhathaas; Maria Di Jiang; Peter Chung; Scott North; Piotr Czaykowski; Sebastien Hotte; Eric Winquist; Christian Kollmannsberger; Armen Aprikian; Denis Soulières; Scott Tyldesley; Alan I So; Nicholas Power; Ricardo A Rendon; Martin O'Malley; Lori Wood; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.052

6.  Practice Patterns and Impact of Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection on Testicular Cancer Outcomes.

Authors:  Solomon L Woldu; Joseph A Moore; Bo Ci; Yuval Freifeld; Timothy N Clinton; Ahmet M Aydin; Nirmish Singla; Krabbe Laura-Maria; Ryan C Hutchinson; James F Amatruda; Arthur Sagalowsky; Yair Lotan; Yull Arriaga; Vitaly Margulis; Yang Xie; Aditya Bagrodia
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-06-06

Review 7.  Update on epidemiologic considerations and treatment trends in testicular cancer.

Authors:  Solomon L Woldu; Aditya Bagrodia
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.309

8.  Testicular Germ-Cell Tumours: A Descriptive Analysis of Clinical Characteristics at First Presentation.

Authors:  Klaus-Peter Dieckmann; Hanna Richter-Simonsen; Magdalena Kulejewski; Raphael Ikogho; Henrik Zecha; Petra Anheuser; Uwe Pichlmeier; Hendrik Isbarn
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Complex surgery and perioperative systemic therapy for genitourinary cancer of the retroperitoneum.

Authors:  A Finelli; N Coakley; J Chin; T A Flood; A Loblaw; C Morash; B Shayegan; R Siemens
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Is there still a place for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage 1 nonseminomatous testicular germ-cell tumours? A retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  K-P Dieckmann; P Anheuser; M Kulejewski; R Gehrckens; B Feyerabend
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.