Literature DB >> 28934822

Stent placement for benign esophageal leaks, perforations, and fistulae: a clinical prediction rule for successful leakage control.

Emo E van Halsema1, Wouter F W Kappelle2, Bas L A M Weusten3, Robert Lindeboom4, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen5, Paul Fockens1, Frank P Vleggaar2, Manon C W Spaander6, Jeanin E van Hooft1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Sealing esophageal leaks by stent placement allows healing in 44 % - 94 % of patients. We aimed to develop a prediction rule to predict the chance of successful stent therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients with benign upper gastrointestinal leakage treated with stent placement were included. We used logistic regression analysis including four known clinical predictors of stent therapy outcome. The model performance to predict successful stent therapy was evaluated in an independent validation sample.
RESULTS: We included etiology, location, C-reactive protein, and size of the leak as clinical predictors. The model was estimated from 145 patients (derivation sample), and 59 patients were included in the validation sample. Stent therapy was successful in 55.9 % and 67.8 % of cases, respectively. The predicted probability of successful stent therapy was significantly higher in success patients compared with failure patients in both the derivation (P < 0.001) and validation (P < 0.001) samples. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 74.1 % in the derivation sample and 84.7 % in the validation sample. When the model predicted ≥ 70 % chance of success, the positive predictive value was 79 % in the derivation sample and 87 % in the validation sample. When the model predicted ≤ 50 % chance of success, the negative predictive value was 64 % and 86 %, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This prediction rule, consisting of four clinical predictors, could identify patients with esophageal leaks who were likely to benefit from or fail on stent therapy. The prediction rule can support clinical decision-making when the predicted probability of success is ≥ 70 % or ≤ 50 %. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28934822     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-118591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  4 in total

1.  Treatment of benign perforations and leaks of the esophagus: factors associated with success after stent placement.

Authors:  Cheal Wung Huh; Joon Sung Kim; Hyun Ho Choi; Ja In Lee; Jeong-Seon Ji; Byung-Wook Kim; Hwang Choi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Esophageal leaks: I thought that glue was not effective.

Authors:  Ignacio Fernández-Urién; Juan Vila
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-09-11

Review 3.  Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: definitions, diagnostics, and treatment.

Authors:  M Fabbi; E R C Hagens; M I van Berge Henegouwen; S S Gisbertz
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  Case Report: Successful Use of Biliary Stent for Iatrogenic Esophageal Perforation Following Balloon Dilation in a 7-Month-Old Infant.

Authors:  Meng-Chuan Liu; Yao-Sheng Wang; Yao-Jong Yang; Fu-Ping Lai
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.418

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.