Literature DB >> 28934410

Approach to cardio-oncologic patients with special focus on patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices planned for radiotherapy: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey.

Radoslaw Lenarczyk1, Tatjana S Potpara2,3, Kristina H Haugaa4,5, Jean-Claude Deharo6, Antonio Hernandez-Madrid7, Maria Del Carmen Exposito Pineda8, Marek Kiliszek9, Nikolaos Dagres10.   

Abstract

The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to evaluate clinical practice regarding cardio-oncologic patients, with special focus on patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) planned for anticancer radiotherapy (RT), among members of the EHRA electrophysiology research network. Of the 36 responding centres, 89% managed patients who were diagnosed or treated oncologically, and this diagnosis affected 1-5% of cardiovascular patients in majority of centres (57%). The main side effects of anticancer therapy in patients treated by cardiologists were thromboembolic complications and left ventricular dysfunction (both reported as 'frequent' by 43% of the centres). The main agents associated with complications were anthracyclines, RT, and monoclonal antibodies. Echocardiography was the most common method of screening for cardiovascular complications (93%), and 10% of the centres did not routinely screen for treatment-induced cardiotoxicity. Opinions on the safe radiation dose, methods of device shielding, and risk calculation prior to RT in CIED patients differed among centres. Precaution measures in high-risk CIED patients were very heterogeneous among centres. Our survey has shown that the awareness of cardiac consequences of anticancer therapy is high, despite relatively low proportion of patients treated oncologically among all cardiovascular patients. There is a consensus of which screening methods should be used for cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatment, but the apprehension of screening necessity is low. Methods of risk assessment and safety measures in CIED patients undergoing RT are very heterogeneous among the European centres, underscoring the need for standardization of the approach to cardio-oncologic patients. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2017. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arrhythmias; Cancer; Cardiac implantable electronic devices; Cardiac toxicity; Cardio-oncology; Device programming; EHRA survey; EP Wire; Radiotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28934410     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  3 in total

1.  Radiotherapy-induced malfunctions of cardiac implantable electronic devices in cancer patients.

Authors:  Vincenzo L Malavasi; Giuseppina De Marco; Jacopo F Imberti; Filippo Placentino; Marco Vitolo; Ercole Mazzeo; Gianfranco Cicoria; Edoardo Casali; Vincenzo Turco; Frank Lohr; Giuseppe Boriani
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  A randomized in vitro evaluation of transient and permanent cardiac implantable electronic device malfunctions following direct exposure up to 10 Gy.

Authors:  Maria Daniela Falco; Domenico Genovesi; Luciana Caravatta; Clelia Di Carlo; Ekaterina Bliakharskaia; Marianna Appignani; Massimiliano Faustino; Nanda Furia; Enrico Di Girolamo
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  PAIDEIA: pacemaker and implanted cardioverter defibrillator management in radiation therapy-a survey by the Young Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO).

Authors:  Anna Rita Alitto; Silvia Chiesa; Pierfrancesco Franco; Michele Fiore; Lorenza Marino; Paolo Borghetti; Isacco Desideri; Daniela Greto; Alba Fiorentino
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.469

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.