Literature DB >> 28933963

Delayed sample arrival at the laboratory does not lead to more false negatives in the Danish population screening for colorectal cancer.

Anette Tarp Hansen1,2, Elke Hoffmann-Lücke1, Betina Klint Nielsen3, Birgitte Reinholdt4, Peter Hindersson5, Karin Heidemann6, Nete Hornung1.   

Abstract

In Denmark, biennial population screening for colorectal cancer was introduced in 2014 for all aged 50-74 years. Five laboratories representative for the regional division of Denmark perform the immunochemical testing of faecal occult blood in the screening samples (iFOBT, OC-Sensor (Eiken Chemical, cut-off 100 µg/L)). In July 2016, a new agreement on the public post-delivery entailed an increased lag time (five days) from the screening participant drops the screening sample into a mail-box until sample arrival at the laboratories. Previous work had reported that a lag time above five days led to more false negative iFOBT tests. We investigated if this was true also under Danish conditions. We performed two stability tests; one with sample storage at 30 °C for 14 days (N = 60), and another with sample storage at room temperature for 13 days (N = 10). We extracted data from our laboratory information system (LABKA) on all iFOBT tests performed in the entire Central Denmark Region (N = 104,328 patients) during the last six months for each calendar year 2014-16. For each year, we computed the distribution of iFOBT tests below and above cut-off. Our stability tests showed no positive samples switching to false negative after storage; however, some negative samples turned false positive, especially at 30 °C. The data showed no change in the distribution of iFOBT tests below and above cut-off after July 2016. We found no evidence that an enhanced lag time increased the number of false negative iFOBT tests in the Danish screening program for colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical laboratory services; colorectal neoplasms; early detection of cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28933963     DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2017.1379091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  2 in total

1.  Examining the Factors That Affect the Diagnosis of Patients with Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Results.

Authors:  Yin-Wen Cheng; Ying-Chun Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 2.  Existing Data Sources in Clinical Epidemiology: Laboratory Information System Databases in Denmark.

Authors:  Johan Frederik Håkonsen Arendt; Anette Tarp Hansen; Søren Andreas Ladefoged; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Lars Pedersen; Kasper Adelborg
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.790

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.