Literature DB >> 28932629

A circulating TH2 cytokines profile predicts survival in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Geny Piro1,2,3, Francesca Simionato3,4, Carmine Carbone1,3, Melissa Frizziero3,4, Giuseppe Malleo3,5, Silvia Zanini3,4, Raffaella Casolino3,4, Raffaela Santoro1,3, Maria Mihaela Mina2,3, Camilla Zecchetto3,4, Valeria Merz3,4, Aldo Scarpa3,6, Claudio Bassi3,5, Giampaolo Tortora2,3,4, Davide Melisi1,3,4.   

Abstract

Surgery is the only potentially curative option for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but metastatic relapse remains common. We hypothesized that the expression levels of inflammatory cytokines could predict recurrence of PDAC, thus allowing to select patients who most likely could benefit from surgical resection. We prospectively collected plasma at diagnosis from 287 patients with pancreatic resectable neoplasms. The expression levels of 23 cytokines were measured in 90 patients with PDAC by using a multiplex analyte profiling assay. Levels higher than cutoff identified of the TH2 cytokines interleukin (IL)4, IL5, IL6 of macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)1α, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)1, and of IL17α, IFNγ-induced protein (IP)10, and IL1b were significantly associated with a shorter median OS. In particular, levels of IL4 and IP10 higher than cutoff identified, and level of TH1 cytokines TNFα and INFγ, and of IL9 and IL1Rα lower than cutoff identified were significantly associated with a shorter DFS. In the multivariate analysis, high IP10 was confirmed as negatively associated with OS (HR = 3.097, p = 0.014) and IL4 and TNFα remain negatively (HR = 2.75, p = 0.002) and positively (HR = 0.224, p = 0.049) associated with DFS, respectively. Simultaneous expression of low IL4 and high TNFα identified patients with best prognosis (HR = 0.313, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, we demonstrated that, among a series of cytokines, IL4 is the most significant independent prognostic factor for DFS in resectable PDAC patients, and it could be useful to select patients with high risk of early recurrence who may avoid an unnecessary resection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IL4; TH2 cytokines; circulating cytokine profile; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; prognostic biomarker

Year:  2017        PMID: 28932629      PMCID: PMC5599089          DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1322242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Introduction

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly disease, with the lowest 5-y relative survival rate among solid tumors at 7%, and is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death by 2030. Surgery is the only potentially curative option for PDAC patients, but metastatic relapse remains common and no more than 20% of patients undergoing surgery and post-surgical therapy achieve long-term survival. Thus, the identification of biologic markers able to predict metastatic recurrence of PDAC remains critical to select patients most likely to benefit from surgical resection. Tumor microenvironment contains both innate and adaptive immune cells that communicate with each other by means of cytokines and chemokines production to control tumor growth and spread. In this “immune contexture,” the cytokine expression profile may be more relevant than its specific immune cell content, and provide malignant cells with continuous supply of growth and survival signals. In PDAC, a dysfunctional immune system aids rather than controls cancer development and progression. However, it is still unclear which cytokines or chemokines are critical for metastasis and prognosis of established tumors. Previous studies examined the association between serum levels of several proinflammatory cytokines and overall survival (OS) in cohorts of patients with mostly advanced PDAC. In these studies, only a high level of IL6 was consistently demonstrated as an independent prognostic factor for poor OS. However, comprehensive cytokine profiles have not been performed in early PDAC to date, therefore it is still unclear the potential value of cytokines or chemokines in predicting recurrence in this disease. Here, we investigated whether the preoperative expression levels of 23 cytokines in a large and prospective cohort of patients with resectable PDAC could be predictive of their Disease free survival (DFS) or OS, thus, serving as potential biomarker to select patients more likely to benefit from an upfront surgical resection.

Results

Association of patients' characteristics with OS and DFS

Two-hundred-eighty-seven patients admitted at the Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery of the Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona between 2012 and 2014 with suspected PDAC were assessed for eligibility. Among them, a total of 90 treatment-naïve resectable patients with histologically proven non-metastatic PDAC were included in the study (Fig. 1). Patients' characteristics are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 63 y and 51% were male. Most of them had tumors in the head of pancreas (79%), T3 stage (96%), and positive nodes (86%). Radical resection (R0) was obtained in 46% of cases. The majority of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (82%), mostly with a gemcitabine-based regimen (97%). After a median follow-up of 26.9 mo, the median DFS was 19.9 mo and the median OS was not reached (data not show). Compliance with REMARK guidelines is reported in Table S1, available at Clinical Cancer Research online.
Figure 1.

Strobe diagram of the study.

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients involved in the study.

Patients characteristics%p (OS)HRp (DFS)HR
Age (y)      
 Median63 0.3191.5720.7721.088
 Range37–77     
Gender      
 Female, n (%)4449    
 Male, n (%)46510.7840.8920.10.626
Tumor stage      
 T1, n (%)11ND ND 
 T2, n (%)22    
 T3, n (%)8696    
 T4, n (%)11    
Nodal stage      
 N0, n (%)1314    
 N+, n (%)77860.4411.7680.4081.435
Metastasis stage      
 M0, n (%)90100    
 M+, n (%)00ND ND 
Location      
 Head, n (%)7179    
 Body/tail, n (%)19210.4900.7200.3460.732
Resection margins      
 R0, n (%)4146    
 R1, n (%)49540.3941.4410.1211.573
Adjuvant therapy      
 No, n (%)1618    
 Yes, n (%)74820.1570.5100.0380.502
 Non-gemcitabine based, n (%)23    
 Gemcitabine-based, n (%)7297ND ND 
Radiotherapy      
 No, n (%)6572    
 Yes, n (%)25280.3830.6430.4300.775
Tumor grade      
 G1, n (%)78    
 G2, n (%)5864    
 G3, n (%)25280.0013.9860.0122.109

HR, hazard ratio; R1, resection denotes a microscopically positive margin; T, Tumor; N, node; G, grade.

Characteristics of patients involved in the study. HR, hazard ratio; R1, resection denotes a microscopically positive margin; T, Tumor; N, node; G, grade. Strobe diagram of the study. Univariate analysis of correlation between clinical features and OS or DFS is shown in Table 1. Among the clinical parameters analyzed, patients with poorly differentiated tumor (G3) had a significantly shorter OS (HR = 3.986, p = 0.001) and DFS (HR = 2.109, p = 0.012) compared with patients with well and moderately differentiated tumors (G1/G2). Conversely, patients treated with adjuvant therapy had a significantly longer DFS than did untreated patients (HR = 0.502, p = 0.038). Association between DFS and other commonly used prognostic parameters, such as microscopically infiltrated resection margins (R1) and positive lymph nodes (N+), although displayed a negative trend, was not statistically significant in this cohort (HR = 1.573, p = 0.121, and HR = 1.435, p = 0.408, respectively).

Association of circulating cytokines and chemokines levels with OS and DFS

To determine whether patterns of circulating cytokines and chemokines could predict patients outcome, we measured the concentration of a panel of 23 different TH1, TH2, TH9, TH17 cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors in preoperative plasma samples from 90 treatment naïve patients with non-metastatic PDAC (Table 2). The optimal cutoff thresholds able to significantly predict patients' outcome were evaluated for each cytokine (Table 2 and Fig. 2A and B).
Table 2.

Pre-surgical circulating cytokines levels significantly correlated with OS and DFS.

Soluble factormean pg/mL (Lower–upper 95%CI)Median pg/mL (range)Association with OS (p)cutoff (pg/mL)Association with DFS (p)cutoff (pg/mL)
TH2 cytokines       
 IL4909.739 (8.12–11.36)7.42 (1.28–45.48)0.0259.3650.019.365
 IL59015.08 (11.64–18.52)9.31 (0–74.02)0.0475.2550.34
 IL69036.8 (26.92–46.67)23.02 (2.96–319.2)0.03823.920.41
 IL139036.22 (29.2–43.25)28.63 (0.5–223.4)0.170.058
TH1 cytokines       
 IFNγ90574.4 (440.1–708.6)392.5 (10.8–3418)0.560.004129
 IL12(p70)9045.05 (30.01–60.1)27.63 (0–561.6)0.070.24
 TNFα9094.17 (66.74–121.6)69.27 (0–1069)0.760.00322.04
 IL29021.22 (8.47–33.97)0 (0–426.2)0.140.096
TH9 cytokines       
 IL99039.22 (23.51–54.92)20.69 (0.3–610)0.660.0215.48
TH17 cytokines       
 IL17α90175.6 (134.8–216.4)109.6 (0–913)0.03360.40.59
Chemokines       
 MIP1α906.44 (5.39–7.49)5.11 (0.8–34.68)0.04210.140.37
 MCP190129.3 (104.6–154)107.9 (10.31–809.7)0.032109.30.15
 MIP1b90107.3 (73.39–141.3)82.13 (26.81–1577)0.940.3
 IP10901734 (1289–2179)1143 (376.2–17964)0.00329580.042958
 IL89079.2 (60.05–98.35)47.62 (8.85–484.6)0.140.054
 eotaxin90175.1 (103.8–246.4)102.7 (0–2912)0.190.062
Other cytokines and growth factors      
 G-CSF90243.5 (191.4–295.5)155.9 (19.9–1076)0.170.064
 GM-CSF9070.95 (50.91–91)49.48 (0–547.6)0.0351340.38
 VEGF9082.82 (63.04–102.6)53.82 (0–471.9)0.170.9
 IL79019.85 (15.88–23.83)14.17 (0–121.2)0.120.11
 IL1590<OOR<OOR<OOR<OOR
 IL1β907.639 (5.526–9.751)5.255 (0–59.64)0.0187.920.44
 IL1Rα90715.1 (480–950.2)356 (4.44–8552)0.660.039115.5
Figure 2.

OS and DFS of patients with PDAC stratified according to cytokines levels. Kaplan–Meier curves for OS (A) and DFS (B) by significant cytokines cutoff concentration in plasma samples. Cytokines concentration expressed as pg/mL. (C) upper left, IL4 level in patients stratified around an early relapse cutoff of 8 mo; upper right, determination of cutoff thresholds of IL4 level for PDAC patients dichotomized according to early relapse of 8 mo. All possible cutoff thresholds were considered and the corresponding odds ratios (OR) were calculated and plotted. Each data point in the line gives the corresponding OR and 95% confidence interval (dotted lines) on the y axis. Lower left, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for IL4 level in patients stratified around early relapse cutoff of 8 mo; lower right, waterfall plot, green and red bars represent cases with correct or wrong classification, respectively.

Pre-surgical circulating cytokines levels significantly correlated with OS and DFS. OS and DFS of patients with PDAC stratified according to cytokines levels. Kaplan–Meier curves for OS (A) and DFS (B) by significant cytokines cutoff concentration in plasma samples. Cytokines concentration expressed as pg/mL. (C) upper left, IL4 level in patients stratified around an early relapse cutoff of 8 mo; upper right, determination of cutoff thresholds of IL4 level for PDAC patients dichotomized according to early relapse of 8 mo. All possible cutoff thresholds were considered and the corresponding odds ratios (OR) were calculated and plotted. Each data point in the line gives the corresponding OR and 95% confidence interval (dotted lines) on the y axis. Lower left, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for IL4 level in patients stratified around early relapse cutoff of 8 mo; lower right, waterfall plot, green and red bars represent cases with correct or wrong classification, respectively. Concentration of the TH2 cytokines IL4, IL5, IL6 of the monocyte/macrophage infiltration cytokines MIP1a, GM-CSF, and MCP-1, and of IL17a, IP10, and IL1b at level higher than cutoff were significantly associated with a shorter patient's median OS. Concentration of IL4 and IP10 higher than cutoff were significantly associated with shorter median DFS. ON the contrary, concentration of TH1 cytokines TNFα and interferon (IFN)γ and of IL9 and IL1Ra higher than cutoff were significantly associated with an increased median DFS. A summary of the overall findings of the study is reported in Fig. 3B.
Figure 3.

Combined cytokine signature predicts DFS. (A) patients were stratified for DFS on the basis of simultaneous expression of low IL4 and high TNFα. (B) tumor-immune network.

Combined cytokine signature predicts DFS. (A) patients were stratified for DFS on the basis of simultaneous expression of low IL4 and high TNFα. (B) tumor-immune network. An additional analysis demonstrated that patients whose DFS exceeded 8 mo had significantly less circulating IL4 level than did patients with DFS<8 mo (p = 0.016) (Fig. 2C). The optimal cutoff threshold of 9.365 pg/mL had a sensitivity of 60% (95% CI = 38.7%–78.1%) and a specificity of 75.7% (95% CI = 64.5%–84.2%). In particular, an early relapse within 8 mo occurred in 12 out of 29 (41.4%) patients with a plasma concentration of IL4 higher than cutoff, and only in 8 out of 61 (13.1%) patients with IL4 lower than cutoff. The same association was not proven for the other cytokines (Fig. S1, available at Clinical Cancer Research online).

Multivariate analysis of correlation between prognostic factors, including plasma cytokines, and OS and DFS

To confirm our findings and select the best prognostic cytokines, we performed a multivariate analysis including clinical features that had univariate significance (p < 0.05), and the most significant prognostic cytokines at univariate analysis (p < 0.01). In this analysis, high IP10 was confirmed as negatively associated with OS (HR = 3.097, p = 0.014) and IL4 and TNFα remain negatively (HR = 2.753, p = 0.002) and positively (HR = 0.224, p = 0.049) associated with DFS, respectively (Table 3).
Table 3.

Multivariate analysis of factors influencing OS and DFS in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

  95% CI
 
VariableHRLowerUpperp
OS
Tumor grade G33.6981.6028.5350.002
IP103.0971.2577.6320.014
DFS
Tumor grade G32.4721.3394.5640.004
Adjuvant therapy0.6090.3121.1860.145
IL42.7531.4655.1750.002
TNFα0.2240.0510.9950.049
INFγ0.8640.1953.8330.847

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidential interval.

Multivariate analysis of factors influencing OS and DFS in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidential interval. Since the multivariate analysis revealed both IL4 and TNFα as independent predictors of DFS, we tried to determine whether the two factors could interact to affect the prognosis of patients. Indeed, concurrent plasma concentrations of IL4 and TNFα lower and higher than their respective cutoffs, identified patients with best prognosis (HR = 0.313, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3A).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this study represents the most comprehensive profiling of cytokines in the largest prospective cohort of resectable PDAC patients to date. We demonstrated that IL4 is the most significant independent prognostic factor for DFS in resectable PDAC patients among a series of cytokines, representing a potential biomarker to stratify patients suited for surgery from patients with high risk of early recurrence who may avoid unnecessary resections. TH2 immune response is defined by the cytokines IL4, IL5, IL9, and IL13, which induce in turn a complex inflammatory response characterized by TH2 subset of CD4+ helper T cells, eosinophils, mast cells, basophils, and alternatively activated macrophages. In particular, IL4 is the signature cytokine of the TH2 effector cells, by acting as both an inducer and an effector cytokine of these cells. In most solid tumors, it is generally conceived that a TH2 inflammation promotes tumorigenesis and tumor growth. In particular, several studies provided evidence for a general TH2 shift in PDAC with a predominance of TH2 cytokines in the plasma of patients (reviewed in). Important studies mainly by the group of Protti and colleagues provided evidence on the mechanisms underlying these observations. They identified a cross talk between PDAC cells and microenvironment components, resulting in thymic stromal lymphopoietin production by activated cancer-associated fibroblasts that, in turn, induced a TH2 cell polarization through myeloid dendritic cell conditioning. The TH2 (GATA-3+)/TH1 (T-bet+) lymphoid cells ratio was independently predictive of DFS and OS in a population of resected PDAC patients. More recently, they demonstrated that basophils recruited in tumor-draining lymph nodes of PDAC patients regulate tumor promoting TH2 inflammation, being the early source of IL4 necessary for the full stabilization of the TH2 phenotype. Our study contributes to this field by providing evidence, through an inductive approach, for a TH2 shift in those PDAC patients for which we expect an early recurrence of disease. We examined a comprehensive immune circulating biomarkers panel demonstrating that high pre-surgical plasma levels of the TH2 cytokines IL4, IL5, IL6, and low plasma levels of TH1 cytokines TNFα and INFγ were significantly associated with worst patients' outcome. More importantly, in the multivariate analysis, we confirmed IL4 as the strongest independent prognostic factor for DFS, a clinical end point directly correlated with tumor aggressiveness that could be not corrupted by the effect of subsequent lines of therapy. IL4 was identified as the original inducer of the polarization of the alternatively activated M2 macrophages, which are generally conceived to suppress antitumor immunity and to favor growth and spreading in solid tumors. However, recent studies correlating the infiltration of M2-polarized CD163+ macrophages and prognosis in patients affected by resectable PDAC reached opposite conclusions. In this regard, our study demonstrated that high plasma levels of the cytokines involved in macrophage recruitment MIP1α, GM-CSF, and MCP1 were significantly associated with shorter patients' survival after surgery. Beside TH2 inflammatory cells, a FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) enriched pancreatic tumor infiltrate has been found to correlate with shorter patient survival. This cell subtype can be recruited in the tumor microenvironment by the chemokine IP10 expressed by pancreatic stellate cells, leading to immunosuppressive and tumor-promoting effects. Consistently with these observations, we demonstrated that high IP10 plasma level were negatively associated with patients' OS. In conclusion, our present study prospectively demonstrated through an inductive approach that circulating markers of a TH2 immune response, and macrophages and Treg recruitment could be predictive of early metastatic relapse and poor prognosis in resectable PDAC patients. The simple measurement of these cytokines by a non-invasive, blood-based assay, and the interpretation of their significance based on the cutoff thresholds here determined could represent a significant advantage over the assessment of the immune cells infiltration and differentiation in preoperative tumor biopsies, which often provide insufficient material to generate intratumor immune profiles and could not completely recapitulate the heterogeneity of these tumors. IL4 emerged among several other cytokines as the most significant independent prognostic factor for DFS in resectable PDAC patients. The expression of this TH2 cytokine could be useful to select patients with high risk of early recurrence who may avoid an unnecessary resection.

Patients and methods

Patients

Inclusion criteria for this study were histopathological confirmation of PDAC, no prior neo-adjuvant therapy, no evidence of metastatic disease, eligible for surgical resection. Peripheral blood samples were prospectively collected from all patients before surgical resection using EDTA-containing tubes. Plasma was isolated from each sample by centrifugation and stored at −20°C. The variables evaluated included age, gender, tumor location, tumor size, differentiation status, lymph node involvement and TNM stage, patterns of resection margins, patterns of recurrence. DFS was determined from the time of surgery until local or metastatic PDAC tumor recurrence. OS was defined as the time of surgery to death. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association.

Multiplex cytokines profiling

Using a 23-plex kit from Bio-Rad, all plasma specimens were analyzed for interleukin (IL)1β, IL2, IL4, IL5, IL6, IL7, IL8 (CXCL8), IL9, IL-12p70, IL13, IL15, IL17a, eotaxin (CCL−11), IL1Rα, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IFNγ, IP10 (CXCL10), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP1; CCL2), macrophage inflammatory protein 1α (MIP1α; CCL3), MIP1β (CCL4), TNFα, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). All Luminex assays were performed according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (Bio-Rad Laboratories). All Luminex assays were performed according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Median fluorescence intensities were collected on a Luminex-200 instrument, using Bio-Plex Manager software version 6.2. Standard curves for each cytokine were generated using the premixed lyophilized standards provided in the kits. Cytokine concentrations in samples were determined from the standard curve using a 5-point regression to transform mean fluorescence intensities into concentrations.

Statistical analysis

Survival curves were drawn by Kaplan–Meier estimates and compared by log rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses of DFS and OS, with stepwise variable selection, were conducted by Cox's proportional hazard regression models. Multivariate analysis was conducted using the clinical-pathologic variables with a p-value < 0.05 and the strongest significant molecular variables in univariate analysis (p-value < 0.01). The optimal cutoff thresholds for soluble biomarkers were obtained based on the maximization of the Youden's statistics J = sensitivity+specificity+128 using an R-based software as described in Budczies et al. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 24.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc.), GraphPad Prism software program (version 6.0; GraphPad Software), and the statistical language R.
  29 in total

Review 1.  Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm.

Authors:  Subhra K Biswas; Alberto Mantovani
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 2.  Immunity, inflammation, and cancer.

Authors:  Sergei I Grivennikov; Florian R Greten; Michael Karin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis.

Authors:  Daniela F Quail; Johanna A Joyce
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States.

Authors:  Lola Rahib; Benjamin D Smith; Rhonda Aizenberg; Allison B Rosenzweig; Julie M Fleshman; Lynn M Matrisian
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Cytokine expression profile in human pancreatic carcinoma cells and in surgical specimens: implications for survival.

Authors:  Graziella Bellone; Carlo Smirne; Francesco Angelo Mauri; Elena Tonel; Anna Carbone; Alessandra Buffolino; Luca Dughera; Antonio Robecchi; Mario Pirisi; Giorgio Emanuelli
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 6.968

6.  Systemic Immune Activity Predicts Overall Survival in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Farren; Thomas A Mace; Susan Geyer; Sameh Mikhail; Christina Wu; Kristen Ciombor; Sanaa Tahiri; Daniel Ahn; Anne M Noonan; Miguel Villalona-Calero; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Gregory B Lesinski
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Prevalence of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells increases during the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its premalignant lesions.

Authors:  Nobuyoshi Hiraoka; Kaoru Onozato; Tomoo Kosuge; Setsuo Hirohashi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  IP-10/CXCL10 induction in human pancreatic cancer stroma influences lymphocytes recruitment and correlates with poor survival.

Authors:  Serena Lunardi; Nigel B Jamieson; Su Yin Lim; Kristin L Griffiths; Manuela Carvalho-Gaspar; Osama Al-Assar; Sabira Yameen; Ross C Carter; Colin J McKay; Gabriele Spoletini; Stefano D'Ugo; Michael A Silva; Owen J Sansom; Klaus-Peter Janssen; Ruth J Muschel; Thomas B Brunner
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-11-30

9.  Basophil Recruitment into Tumor-Draining Lymph Nodes Correlates with Th2 Inflammation and Reduced Survival in Pancreatic Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Lucia De Monte; Sonja Wörmann; Emanuela Brunetto; Silvia Heltai; Gilda Magliacane; Michele Reni; Anna Maria Paganoni; Helios Recalde; Anna Mondino; Massimo Falconi; Francesca Aleotti; Gianpaolo Balzano; Hana Algül; Claudio Doglioni; Maria Pia Protti
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Serum levels of IL-6 and IL-1β can predict the efficacy of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  S Mitsunaga; M Ikeda; S Shimizu; I Ohno; J Furuse; M Inagaki; S Higashi; H Kato; K Terao; A Ochiai
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  22 in total

1.  Differential role of Interleukin-1 and Interleukin-6 in K-Ras-driven pancreatic carcinoma undergoing mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Imran Siddiqui; Marco Erreni; Mohammad Azhar Kamal; Chiara Porta; Federica Marchesi; Samantha Pesce; Fabio Pasqualini; Silvia Schiarea; Chiara Chiabrando; Alberto Mantovani; Paola Allavena
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 8.110

2.  Serum biomarker panel diagnostics in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the clinical utility of soluble interleukins, IFN-γ, TNF-α and PD-1/PD-L1 in comparison to established serum tumor markers.

Authors:  Klara Dorman; Miriam Gerckens; Stefan Boeck; Stefan Holdenrieder; Stephan Kruger; Kimberly Krueger; Zsuzsanna Mayer; Alexander Rupp; Danmei Zhang; Lena Weiss; C Benedikt Westphalen; Michael Haas; Michael Guenther; Steffen Ormanns; Frank Klawonn; Jens Werner; Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Volker Heinemann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Fungal mycobiome drives IL-33 secretion and type 2 immunity in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Aftab Alam; Eric Levanduski; Parker Denz; Helena Solleiro Villavicencio; Maulasri Bhatta; Lamees Alhorebi; Yali Zhang; Eduardo Cortes Gomez; Brian Morreale; Sharon Senchanthisai; Jun Li; Steven G Turowski; Sandra Sexton; Sheila Jani Sait; Prashant K Singh; Jianmin Wang; Anirban Maitra; Pawel Kalinski; Ronald A DePinho; Huamin Wang; Wenting Liao; Scott I Abrams; Brahm H Segal; Prasenjit Dey
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 4.  Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: Why Do We Keep Failing? A Focus on Tumor Immune Microenvironment, Predictive Biomarkers and Treatment Outcomes.

Authors:  Alessandro Di Federico; Mirta Mosca; Rachele Pagani; Riccardo Carloni; Giorgio Frega; Andrea De Giglio; Alessandro Rizzo; Dalia Ricci; Simona Tavolari; Mariacristina Di Marco; Andrea Palloni; Giovanni Brandi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Elevated serum levels of sialyl Lewis X (sLeX) and inflammatory mediators in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Evan N Cohen; Tamer M Fouad; Bang-Ning Lee; Banu K Arun; Diane Liu; Sanda Tin; Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera; Toshihide Miura; Iwao Kiyokawa; Jun Yamashita; Ricardo H Alvarez; Vicente Valero; Wendy A Woodward; Yu Shen; Naoto T Ueno; Massimo Cristofanilli; James M Reuben
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Methylation of immune-regulatory cytokine genes and pancreatic cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Brian Z Huang; Alexandra M Binder; Catherine A Sugar; Chun R Chao; Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Zuo-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.778

7.  Galunisertib plus gemcitabine vs. gemcitabine for first-line treatment of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Davide Melisi; Rocio Garcia-Carbonero; Teresa Macarulla; Denis Pezet; Gael Deplanque; Martin Fuchs; Jorg Trojan; Helmut Oettle; Mark Kozloff; Ann Cleverly; Claire Smith; Shawn T Estrem; Ivelina Gueorguieva; Michael M F Lahn; Al Blunt; Karim A Benhadji; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Induction of immunosuppressive functions and NF-κB by FLIP in monocytes.

Authors:  Alessandra Fiore; Stefano Ugel; Francesco De Sanctis; Sara Sandri; Giulio Fracasso; Rosalinda Trovato; Silvia Sartoris; Samantha Solito; Susanna Mandruzzato; Fulvia Vascotto; Keli L Hippen; Giada Mondanelli; Ursula Grohmann; Geny Piro; Carmine Carbone; Davide Melisi; Rita T Lawlor; Aldo Scarpa; Alessia Lamolinara; Manuela Iezzi; Matteo Fassan; Silvio Bicciato; Bruce R Blazar; Ugur Sahin; Peter J Murray; Vincenzo Bronte
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Tumoral EHF predicts the efficacy of anti-PD1 therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Wenna Jiang; Kaili Zhao; Hongwei Wang; Tianxing Zhou; Weiwei Bai; Xiuchao Wang; Tiansuo Zhao; Chongbiao Huang; Song Gao; Tai Qin; Wenwen Yu; Bo Yang; Xin Li; Danqi Fu; Wei Tan; Shengyu Yang; He Ren; Jihui Hao
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 14.307

Review 10.  T-Cell Immunity in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Reham Ajina; Louis M Weiner
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.