BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Numerous studies have been performed to investigate the correlation between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and the incidence of brain metastases (BMs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, the outcomes were inconsistent. Thus, we performed this study to establish the role of EGFR mutation status in BMs. METHODS: Electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang, CNKI were searched to identify relevant trials. The primary endpoint was the incidence of BMs in EGFR mutations or wild type NSCLC and the secondary endpoint was overall survival calculated from the BMs emerging (BMOS). RESULTS: Twenty-two studies incorporating 8,152 participants were eligible. EGFR mutations group possessed a significantly higher risk of BMs (OR =1.99; 95% CI, 1.59-2.48; P=0.000) than EGFR wild type group. In the stratified analysis, compared with EGFR wild type group, EGFR mutations group had a significant higher incidence (OR =2.01; 95% CI, 1.56-2.59; P=0.000) of subsequent BMs while only a trend of increasing the incidence of initial BMs (OR =1.38; 95% CI, 0.98-1.94; P=0.066). Moreover, exon 19 deletion had a trend of increasing the incidence of BMs than exon 21 mutation (OR =1.44; 95% CI, 0.77-2.68; P=0.252). Compared with EGFR wild type group, EGFR mutations group possessed a prolonged overall BMOS (HR =0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.98; P=0.038) and a longer BMOS in initial BMs (HR =0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.80; P=0.004) but no significant difference in NSCLC with subsequent BMs (HR =0.95; 95% CI, 0.42-2.15; P=0.901). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EGFR mutations were more susceptible to develop into BMs than those with EGFR wild type, especially during the course of disease.
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Numerous studies have been performed to investigate the correlation between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and the incidence of brain metastases (BMs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, the outcomes were inconsistent. Thus, we performed this study to establish the role of EGFR mutation status in BMs. METHODS: Electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang, CNKI were searched to identify relevant trials. The primary endpoint was the incidence of BMs in EGFR mutations or wild type NSCLC and the secondary endpoint was overall survival calculated from the BMs emerging (BMOS). RESULTS: Twenty-two studies incorporating 8,152 participants were eligible. EGFR mutations group possessed a significantly higher risk of BMs (OR =1.99; 95% CI, 1.59-2.48; P=0.000) than EGFR wild type group. In the stratified analysis, compared with EGFR wild type group, EGFR mutations group had a significant higher incidence (OR =2.01; 95% CI, 1.56-2.59; P=0.000) of subsequent BMs while only a trend of increasing the incidence of initial BMs (OR =1.38; 95% CI, 0.98-1.94; P=0.066). Moreover, exon 19 deletion had a trend of increasing the incidence of BMs than exon 21 mutation (OR =1.44; 95% CI, 0.77-2.68; P=0.252). Compared with EGFR wild type group, EGFR mutations group possessed a prolonged overall BMOS (HR =0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.98; P=0.038) and a longer BMOS in initial BMs (HR =0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.80; P=0.004) but no significant difference in NSCLC with subsequent BMs (HR =0.95; 95% CI, 0.42-2.15; P=0.901). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with EGFR mutations were more susceptible to develop into BMs than those with EGFR wild type, especially during the course of disease.
Authors: Jerrica L Breindel; Jonathan W Haskins; Elizabeth P Cowell; Minghui Zhao; Don X Nguyen; David F Stern Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Minesh P Mehta; Patrick Rodrigus; C H J Terhaard; Aroor Rao; John Suh; Wilson Roa; Luis Souhami; Andrea Bezjak; Mark Leibenhaut; Ritsuko Komaki; Christopher Schultz; Robert Timmerman; Walter Curran; Jennifer Smith; See-Chun Phan; Richard A Miller; Markus F Renschler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael Offin; Daniel Feldman; Ai Ni; Mackenzie L Myers; W Victoria Lai; Elena Pentsova; Adrienne Boire; Mariza Daras; Emmet J Jordan; David B Solit; Maria E Arcila; David R Jones; James M Isbell; Kathryn Beal; Robert J Young; Charles M Rudin; Gregory J Riely; Alexander Drilon; Viviane Tabar; Lisa M DeAngelis; Helena A Yu; Mark G Kris; Bob T Li Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Devarati Mitra; Yu-Hui Chen; Richard Li; Gretchen Hermann; Katelyn Atkins; David Kozono; Elizabeth H Baldini; Ayal Aizer; Ugonma Chukwueke; Raymond H Mak Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-06-27
Authors: Antonio Passaro; Filippo de Marinis; Hai-Yan Tu; Konstantin K Laktionov; Jifeng Feng; Artem Poltoratskiy; Jun Zhao; Eng Huat Tan; Maya Gottfried; Victor Lee; Dariusz Kowalski; Cheng Ta Yang; B J Srinivasa; Laura Clementi; Tejaswini Jalikop; Dennis Chin Lun Huang; Agnieszka Cseh; Keunchil Park; Yi-Long Wu Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 6.244