Literature DB >> 28932480

Crystal structure of N-(4-hy-droxy-benz-yl)acetone thio-semicarbazone.

Saray Argibay-Otero1, Ezequiel M Vázquez-López1.   

Abstract

The structure of the title compound, C11H15N3OS, shows the flexibility due to the methyl-ene group at the thio-amide N atom in the side chain, resulting in the mol-ecule being non-planar. The dihedral angle between the plane of the benzene ring and that defined by the atoms of the thio-semicarbazide arm is 79.847 (4)°. In the crystal, the donor-acceptor hydrogen-bond character of the -OH group dominates the inter-molecular associations, acting as a donor in an O-H⋯S hydrogen bond, as well as being a double acceptor in a centrosymmetric cyclic bridging N-H⋯O,O' inter-action [graph set R22(4)]. The result is a one-dimensional duplex chain structure, extending along [111]. The usual N-H⋯S hydrogen-bonding association common in thio-semicarbazone crystal structures is not observed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; hydrogen bonding; thio­semicarbazone; thio­urea

Year:  2017        PMID: 28932480      PMCID: PMC5588586          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017012129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Thio­semicarbazones (TSCs) are an inter­esting group of compounds because they show diverse biological properties (Serda et al., 2012 ▸) and pharmacological activities (Lukmantara et al., 2013 ▸). They can be easily functionalized to yield different supra­molecular arrays through inter­molecular hydrogen-bonding inter­actions (Nuñez-Montenegro et al., 2017 ▸), by selection of suitable aldehyde or ketone reagents. In addition, metal coordination may be used to orient some of their substituents to optimize the inter­action with biomolecules (e.g. see Nuñez-Montenegro et al., 2014 ▸). In the present paper, we describe the synthesis and crystal structure of a TSC derivative (Figs. 1 ▸), namely N-(4-hy­droxy­benz­yl)acetone thio­semicarbazone (acTSC), having a 4-hy­droxy­benzyl substituent at the thio­amide N atom (N1), in which the –CH2– group provides more flexibility to establish inter­molecular associations.
Figure 1

Reaction scheme for the synthesis of acTSC.

Structural commentary

In the acTSC mol­ecule (Fig. 2 ▸), the bond lengths (S1=C1 and C10=N3) and angles in the thio­semicarbazide arm are similar to those observed in other thio­semicarbazones, suggesting that the thione form is predominant. This arm is almost planar, probably due to some π-delocation (r.m.s. deviation of 0.0516 Å for the plane defined by atoms S1/C1/N1/N2/N3). Nevertheless, the ethyl­ene group at N1 allows an almost orthogonal orientation relative to the phenolic substituent group, with a dihedral angle between the two planes of 79.847 (4)°. The interatomic distance N1⋯N3 inter­action [2.6074 (18) Å] suggests some kind of intramolecular interaction.
Figure 2

The mol­ecular structure of acTSC, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 40% probability level.

Supra­molecular features

The association of the mol­ecules is strongly affected by the donor–acceptor character of the –OH group, while the usual N—H⋯S hydrogen bonds observed in most TSC structures (Nuñez-Montenegro et al., 2017 ▸; Pino-Cuevas et al., 2014 ▸) are absent. The phenolic –OH group forms an inter­molecular hydrogen bond with a S-atom acceptor (O—H0⋯S1iii; Table 1 ▸), while the N2—H group establishes two different hydrogen-bonding inter­actions with different phenolic O-atom acceptors. The shortest of these is N2—H2⋯Oi (Table 1 ▸), which generates a centrosymmetric cyclic (4) ring-motif association (Etter, 1990 ▸) and also forms a conjoined cyclic (6) association via an O—H⋯S inter­action (see Fig. 3 ▸). The second of the three-centre hydrogen-bonding inter­actions (N2—H2⋯Oii) extends the structure into one-dimensional duplex chains along [111] (Fig. 3 ▸).
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯Oi 0.848 (17)2.292 (17)2.9955 (15)140.6 (14)
N2—H2⋯Oii 0.848 (17)2.434 (16)3.1333 (15)140.3 (14)
O—H0⋯S1iii 0.857 (19)2.299 (19)3.1349 (10)165.2 (16)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

Figure 3

Inter­molecular hydrogen-bonding associations between mol­ecules in the crystal structure of acTSC, shown as dashed lines.

Database survey

For related structures of thio­semicarbazones derived from acetone, see: Yamin et al. (2014 ▸); Basu & Das (2011 ▸); Venkatraman et al. (2005 ▸); Jian et al. (2005 ▸). For the metal-coordination properties of thio­semicarbazones, see: Paterson & Donnelly (2011 ▸); Casas et al. (2000 ▸). For acetone derivatives, see, for example, Su et al. (2013 ▸); Nuñez-Montenegro et al. (2014 ▸); Swesi et al. (2006 ▸); Paek et al. (1997 ▸).

Synthesis and crystallization

The reaction scheme for the synthesis of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1 ▸. The primary amine 4-hy­droxy­benzyl­amine was converted to the corresponding iso­thio­cyanate by reaction with thio­phosgene (Sharma, 1978 ▸). This iso­thio­cyanate was treated with hydrazide to form the thio­semicarbazide, as described previously (Reis et al., 2011 ▸). Finally, this compound was reacted with acetone in order to synthesize the desired thio­semicarbazone. In a typical synthesis, 3.4 g (0.017 mol) of thio­semicarbazide was dissolved in acetone (20 ml) and heated to 60°C for 20 min (Fig. 1 ▸). This solution was concentrated and the resultant residue was purified using a silica column (AcOEt–hexane 30%). This solution was vacuum dried giving 1.96 g of acTSC. The solution was also used to obtain single crystals by slow evaporation (yield 48%; m.p. 165°C). C11H15N3OS requires: C 55.7, H 6.4, N 17.7%; found C 55.8, H 7.1,N 16.9%. MS–ESI [m/z (%)]: 238 (100) [M + H]+. IR (ATR, ν/cm−1): 3241 (b) ν(NH, OH); 1536 (w), 1508 (s) ν(C=N); 784 (w) ν(C=S). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6): 9.95 (s, 1H, N2H), 9.26 (s, 1H, OH), 8.46 (t, 3 J H-NH = 6.2Hz, 1H, N1H), 7.15 (d, 3 J H-H = 8.5Hz, 2H, C5H, C9H), 6.70 (d, 3 J H-H = 8.5Hz, 2H, C6H, C8H), 4.65 (d, 3 J H-H = 6.2Hz, 2H, C3H), 1.92 (d, 3 J H-H = 8.5Hz, 6H, C11H, C12H).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. Inter­active H atoms on O and N atoms were located in difference Fourier analyses and were allowed to freely refine, with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(O,N) and riding. Other H atoms were included at calculated sites and allowed to ride, with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(aromatic and methyl­ene C) or 1.5U eq(methyl C).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC11H15N3OS
M r 237.32
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)8.2799 (8), 8.9169 (9), 9.7451 (10)
α, β, γ (°)104.597 (3), 112.569 (3), 105.220 (3)
V3)588.7 (1)
Z 2
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.26
Crystal size (mm)0.18 × 0.11 × 0.11
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker D8 Venture Photon 100 CMOS
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)
T min, T max 0.638, 0.746
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections17083, 2911, 2562
R int 0.043
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.667
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.032, 0.082, 1.00
No. of reflections2911
No. of parameters156
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.29, −0.28

Computer programs: APEX3 (Bruker, 2014 ▸), SAINT (Bruker, 2014 ▸), SHELXS2013 (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2013 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸) and Mercury (Bruno et al., 2002 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017012129/zs2385sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017012129/zs2385Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1570200 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C11H15N3OSF(000) = 252
Mr = 237.32Dx = 1.339 Mg m3
Triclinic, P1Melting point: 438 K
a = 8.2799 (8) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 8.9169 (9) ÅCell parameters from 9917 reflections
c = 9.7451 (10) Åθ = 2.5–28.3°
α = 104.597 (3)°µ = 0.26 mm1
β = 112.569 (3)°T = 100 K
γ = 105.220 (3)°Prism, colourless
V = 588.7 (1) Å30.18 × 0.11 × 0.11 mm
Z = 2
Bruker D8 Venture Photon 100 CMOS diffractometer2562 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.043
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.5°
Tmin = 0.638, Tmax = 0.746h = −11→11
17083 measured reflectionsk = −11→11
2911 independent reflectionsl = −12→13
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.082w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0325P)2 + 0.3538P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.00(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2911 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
156 parametersΔρmin = −0.28 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C120.5032 (2)−0.1953 (2)0.3563 (2)0.0345 (4)
H12A0.6301−0.10420.43090.052*
H12B0.5165−0.29710.30360.052*
H12C0.4356−0.21990.41660.052*
C110.1912 (2)−0.26338 (16)0.10998 (17)0.0243 (3)
H11A0.1070−0.25060.15620.036*
H11B0.1842−0.37930.08280.036*
H11C0.1508−0.24010.01180.036*
S10.33739 (4)0.28903 (4)0.00401 (4)0.02014 (10)
O0.96910 (14)0.95385 (12)0.83590 (11)0.0206 (2)
H01.063 (3)1.046 (2)0.864 (2)0.031*
N20.37419 (16)0.05734 (13)0.12372 (13)0.0170 (2)
H20.254 (2)0.024 (2)0.0853 (19)0.020*
N10.65479 (15)0.27673 (13)0.21157 (13)0.0163 (2)
H10.701 (2)0.225 (2)0.2663 (19)0.020*
N30.47907 (15)0.00499 (14)0.23774 (13)0.0194 (2)
C60.79084 (18)0.67223 (16)0.64146 (15)0.0173 (2)
H60.73080.64840.70380.021*
C30.77639 (18)0.44581 (15)0.24342 (15)0.0171 (2)
H3A0.71000.47890.15510.021*
H3B0.89510.44380.24270.021*
C10.46524 (17)0.20611 (15)0.12097 (14)0.0147 (2)
C40.82883 (17)0.57817 (15)0.40388 (14)0.0148 (2)
C70.92864 (17)0.83296 (15)0.69457 (14)0.0158 (2)
C90.96926 (17)0.73918 (15)0.46107 (15)0.0170 (2)
H91.03190.76220.40030.020*
C81.01956 (17)0.86683 (15)0.60508 (15)0.0164 (2)
H81.11500.97600.64190.020*
C50.74164 (17)0.54680 (15)0.49646 (15)0.0162 (2)
H50.64660.43760.46000.019*
C100.39253 (19)−0.14134 (17)0.23078 (16)0.0197 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C120.0274 (8)0.0421 (9)0.0502 (10)0.0188 (7)0.0187 (7)0.0374 (8)
C110.0297 (7)0.0153 (6)0.0263 (7)0.0065 (5)0.0131 (6)0.0090 (5)
S10.01646 (16)0.01708 (15)0.02248 (17)0.00497 (12)0.00379 (13)0.01202 (12)
O0.0182 (5)0.0184 (4)0.0173 (4)0.0022 (4)0.0071 (4)0.0030 (4)
N20.0138 (5)0.0164 (5)0.0197 (5)0.0056 (4)0.0053 (4)0.0104 (4)
N10.0152 (5)0.0145 (5)0.0182 (5)0.0059 (4)0.0059 (4)0.0083 (4)
N30.0174 (5)0.0228 (5)0.0238 (6)0.0108 (4)0.0097 (5)0.0157 (5)
C60.0154 (6)0.0201 (6)0.0178 (6)0.0059 (5)0.0085 (5)0.0101 (5)
C30.0151 (6)0.0164 (6)0.0187 (6)0.0042 (5)0.0081 (5)0.0076 (5)
C10.0163 (6)0.0135 (5)0.0139 (5)0.0060 (5)0.0075 (5)0.0046 (4)
C40.0131 (5)0.0158 (5)0.0161 (6)0.0072 (5)0.0055 (5)0.0082 (5)
C70.0134 (5)0.0169 (6)0.0144 (6)0.0067 (5)0.0036 (5)0.0065 (4)
C90.0154 (6)0.0182 (6)0.0202 (6)0.0065 (5)0.0094 (5)0.0110 (5)
C80.0131 (5)0.0146 (5)0.0194 (6)0.0041 (4)0.0056 (5)0.0086 (5)
C50.0131 (5)0.0154 (5)0.0186 (6)0.0042 (4)0.0060 (5)0.0087 (5)
C100.0213 (6)0.0225 (6)0.0263 (7)0.0131 (5)0.0155 (5)0.0152 (5)
S1—C11.6959 (14)C8—C91.3914 (18)
O—C71.3708 (16)C10—C111.498 (2)
O—H00.86 (2)C10—C121.495 (2)
N1—C31.4527 (19)C3—H3A0.9900
N1—C11.3328 (19)C3—H3B0.9900
N2—N31.3929 (17)C5—H50.9500
N2—C11.3554 (19)C6—H60.9500
N3—C101.284 (2)C8—H80.9500
N1—H10.839 (18)C9—H90.9500
N2—H20.849 (18)C11—H11A0.9800
C3—C41.5186 (18)C11—H11B0.9800
C4—C51.391 (2)C11—H11C0.9800
C4—C91.395 (2)C12—H12A0.9800
C5—C61.3914 (19)C12—H12B0.9800
C6—C71.392 (2)C12—H12C0.9800
C7—C81.391 (2)
C7—O—H0111.1 (13)N1—C3—H3B109.00
C1—N1—C3124.73 (12)C4—C3—H3A109.00
N2—N3—C10116.82 (12)C4—C3—H3B109.00
S1—C1—N1124.19 (11)H3A—C3—H3B108.00
S1—C1—N2119.75 (11)C4—C5—H5119.00
C1—N1—H1115.1 (12)C6—C5—H5119.00
C3—N1—H1119.1 (12)C5—C6—H6120.00
N1—C1—N2116.05 (12)C7—C6—H6120.00
N3—N2—H2120.9 (12)C7—C8—H8120.00
C1—N2—H2116.2 (13)C9—C8—H8120.00
N1—C3—C4113.39 (12)C4—C9—H9119.00
C3—C4—C5122.91 (12)C8—C9—H9119.00
C5—C4—C9118.17 (12)C10—C11—H11A109.00
C3—C4—C9118.92 (12)C10—C11—H11B109.00
C4—C5—C6121.31 (13)C10—C11—H11C109.00
C5—C6—C7119.54 (13)H11A—C11—H11B109.00
O—C7—C6117.57 (13)H11A—C11—H11C109.00
C6—C7—C8120.21 (12)H11B—C11—H11C109.00
O—C7—C8122.21 (12)C10—C12—H12A109.00
C7—C8—C9119.30 (13)C10—C12—H12B109.00
C4—C9—C8121.46 (13)C10—C12—H12C109.00
N3—C10—C12116.82 (14)H12A—C12—H12B109.00
C11—C10—C12116.61 (14)H12A—C12—H12C109.00
N3—C10—C11126.57 (13)H12B—C12—H12C109.00
N1—C3—H3A109.00
C3—N1—C1—S110.03 (19)C3—C4—C9—C8178.25 (13)
C3—N1—C1—N2−171.02 (12)C3—C4—C5—C6−178.75 (14)
C1—N1—C3—C497.14 (15)C9—C4—C5—C60.6 (2)
C1—N2—N3—C10−175.62 (14)C5—C4—C9—C8−1.1 (2)
N3—N2—C1—S1−170.98 (10)C4—C5—C6—C70.7 (2)
N3—N2—C1—N110.02 (19)C5—C6—C7—C8−1.4 (2)
N2—N3—C10—C12−178.18 (13)C5—C6—C7—O178.34 (13)
N2—N3—C10—C111.5 (2)O—C7—C8—C9−178.83 (13)
N1—C3—C4—C9169.60 (13)C6—C7—C8—C90.9 (2)
N1—C3—C4—C5−11.0 (2)C7—C8—C9—C40.4 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···Oi0.848 (17)2.292 (17)2.9955 (15)140.6 (14)
N2—H2···Oii0.848 (17)2.434 (16)3.1333 (15)140.3 (14)
O—H0···S1iii0.857 (19)2.299 (19)3.1349 (10)165.2 (16)
  12 in total

1.  New software for searching the Cambridge Structural Database and visualizing crystal structures.

Authors:  Ian J Bruno; Jason C Cole; Paul R Edgington; Magnus Kessler; Clare F Macrae; Patrick McCabe; Jonathan Pearson; Robin Taylor
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2002-05-29

2.  Synthesis, characterization and binding affinities of rhenium(I) thiosemicarbazone complexes for the estrogen receptor (α/β).

Authors:  Ara Núñez-Montenegro; Rosa Carballo; Ezequiel M Vázquez-López
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.155

Review 3.  Copper complexes of bis(thiosemicarbazones): from chemotherapeutics to diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Brett M Paterson; Paul S Donnelly
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  Oxidative cyclization of thiosemicarbazone: an optical and turn-on fluorescent chemodosimeter for Cu(II).

Authors:  Arghya Basu; Gopal Das
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.390

5.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of substituted 2-benzoylpyridine thiosemicarbazones: novel structure-activity relationships underpinning their anti-proliferative and chelation efficacy.

Authors:  Adeline Y Lukmantara; Danuta S Kalinowski; Naresh Kumar; Des R Richardson
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Synthesis, characterization, and anticancer activity of a series of ketone-N(4)-substituted thiosemicarbazones and their ruthenium(II) arene complexes.

Authors:  Wei Su; Quanquan Qian; Peiyuan Li; Xiaolin Lei; Qi Xiao; Shan Huang; Chusheng Huang; Jianguo Cui
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.165

7.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

9.  Microwave-assisted synthesis of new N₁,N₄-substituted thiosemicarbazones.

Authors:  Camilla Moretto dos Reis; Danilo Sousa Pereira; Rojane de Oliveira Paiva; Lucimar Ferreira Kneipp; Aurea Echevarria
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Investigation of the biological properties of (hetero)aromatic thiosemicarbazones.

Authors:  Maciej Serda; Anna Mrozek-Wilczkiewicz; Josef Jampilek; Matus Pesko; Katarina Kralova; Marcela Vejsova; Robert Musiol; Alicja Ratuszna; Jaroslaw Polanski
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Influence of Complexation of Thiosemicarbazone Derivatives with Cu (II) Ions on Their Antitumor Activity against Melanoma Cells.

Authors:  Monika Pitucha; Agnieszka Korga-Plewko; Agnieszka Czylkowska; Bartłomiej Rogalewicz; Monika Drozd; Magdalena Iwan; Joanna Kubik; Ewelina Humeniuk; Grzegorz Adamczuk; Zbigniew Karczmarzyk; Emilia Fornal; Waldemar Wysocki; Paulina Bartnik
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.