Literature DB >> 28932434

Crystal structure of 2,3-diphenyl-2,3-di-hydro-4H-1,3-benzo-thia-zin-4-one 1-oxide.

Hemant P Yennawar1, Ryan Fox2, Quentin J Moyer2, Ziwei Yang2, Lee J Silverberg2.   

Abstract

In the racemic title compound, C20H15NO2S, the planes of the two phenyl substituents form dihedral angles of 48.97 (15) and 69.26 (15)° with that of the fused benzene ring of the parent benzo-thia-zine ring, while the heterocyclic thia-zine ring exhibits a screw-boat pucker. The O atom on the S atom of the ring is pseudo-axial on the thia-zine ring and trans to the 2-phenyl group. In the crystal, mol-ecules are arranged in layers in the ac plane, the layers being linked across b through inter-molecular C-H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter-actions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1,3-benzo­thia­zin-4-one; S-oxide; benzo­thia­zine; crystal structure; screw-boat pucker

Year:  2017        PMID: 28932434      PMCID: PMC5598846          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017010313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

The 2,3-di­hydro-4H-1,3-benzo­thia­zin-4-one scaffold has shown a wide range of bioactivity, including anti­tumor (Li et al., 2012 ▸; Wang et al., 2015 ▸; Kamel et al., 2010 ▸; Nofal et al., 2014 ▸), anti­microbial (Popiolek et al., 2016 ▸; Mandour et al., 2007 ▸), anti­malarial (Mei et al., 2013 ▸), HIV–RT inhibition (Jeng et al., 2015 ▸; Hou et al., 2016 ▸) and cyclo­oxygenase COX-2 enzyme inhibition (Zarghi et al., 2009 ▸). The S-oxides of these compounds have been little studied (a search found fewer than 50), despite the evidence of enhanced activity in the similar 2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zin-4-ones (Surrey et al., 1958 ▸; Surrey, 1963a ▸,b ▸) and 1,3-thia­zolidin-4-ones (Gududuru et al., 2004 ▸). Also of potential inter­est is the tri­phenyl­tin chloride adduct, which may have enhanced anti­fungal activity (Eng et al., 1996 ▸). Recently, we reported the crystal structures of 2,3-diphenyl-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zine-4-one 1-oxide (Yennawar, Yang & Silverberg, 2016 ▸) and the 1:1 adduct of tri­phenyl­tin chloride and 2,3-diphenyl-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zin-4-one (Yennawar, Fox & Silverberg, 2016 ▸). Attempts to prepare the tri­phenyl­tin chloride adduct of 2,3-diphenyl-2,3-di­hydro-4H-1,3-benzo­thia­zin-4-one instead produced the sulfoxide 2,3-diphenyl-2,3-di­hydro-4H-1,3-benzo­thia­zin-4-one 1-oxide on two separate occasions. The sulfoxide was also intentionally prepared by oxidation of 2,3-diphenyl-2,3-di­hydro-4H-1,3-benzo­thia­zin-4-one with Oxone®. It has not yet been determined how the sulfoxide formed in the tin reaction, but Bourgoin-Legay & Boudet (1969 ▸) have reported the air oxidation of 2-alkyl-4H-1,3-benzo­thia­zines to give the sulfoxides, although the analogous 2-aryl compounds were less prone to air oxidation. In this article, we report the crystal structure of the product from one of the reactions using tin, the title compound, namely 2,3-diphenyl-2,3-di­hydro-4H-1,3-benzo­thia­zin-4-one 1-oxide, (I). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported crystal structure of an S-oxide of a 2,3-di­hydro-4H-1,3-benzo­thia­zin-4-one.

Structural commentary

In the title racemic compound, the planes of the two phenyl substituents form dihedral angles of 48.97 (15) and 69.26 (15)° with that of the fused benzene ring of the parent benzo­thia­zine system (Fig. 1 ▸). The O atom on the S atom is pseudo-axial and trans to the 2-phenyl ring, just as in 2,3-diphenyl-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zin-4-one 1-oxide (Yennawar, Yang & Silverberg, 2016 ▸). The thia­zine ring has a screw-boat conformation, with a puckering amplitude of 0.686 (2) Å and θ = 65.6 (2)° (Cremer & Pople, 1975 ▸). The thia­zine ring in 2,3-diphenyl-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zin-4-one 1-oxide (Yennawar, Yang & Silverberg, 2016 ▸) was in an envelope conformation. The overall mol­ecular configuration is quite similar to the structure of 2,3-diphenyl-2,3-di­hydro-4H-1,3-benzo­thia­zin-4-one (Yennawar et al., 2014 ▸).
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

Supra­molecular features

The crystal lattice has layers of mol­ecules comprising alternating enanti­omers, extending along the a-axis direction and lying in the ac plane. The layers are linked across the b-cell direction through inter­molecular C1—H⋯O2i hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2 ▸, Table 1 ▸) between mol­ecules of the same chirality [symmetry code: (i) −x + , y − , −z + ]. While C—H⋯O inter­actions are also present in our two earlier structures (Yennawar et al., 2014 ▸; Yennawar, Yang & Silverberg, 2016 ▸), the differences in either the donor C or acceptor O atoms make them unique in each case. In the present structure, the chiral C atom donates the proton to the O atom at position 4 (⋯O—C) of the thia­zine ring, while in our 2016 ▸ structure, the acceptor O atom was the one at position 1 (⋯O—S). In the 2014 ▸ structure, the two benzene-ring C atoms are the donors to the only O atom (⋯O—C) on the thia­zine ring.
Figure 2

Crystal packing diagram showing C—H⋯O contacts as dotted red lines between mol­ecules of (I) which form chains along the b-axis direction.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C1—H1⋯O2i 0.982.313.240 (3)157

Symmetry code: (i) .

Database survey

A literature search found no prior reports of a crystal structure of an S-oxide of a 2,3-di­hydro-4H-1,3-benzo­thia­zin-4-one. We have previously reported the crystal structures of 2,3-diphenyl-2,3,5,6-tetra­hydro-4H-1,3-thia­zin-4-one 1-oxide (Yennawar, Yang & Silverberg, 2016 ▸) and 2,3-diphenyl-2,3-di­hydro-4H-1,3-benzo­thia­zin-4-one (Yennawar et al., 2014 ▸).

Synthesis and crystallization

A 2 ml reactivial with a stir bar was charged with 0.1004 g of 2,3-diphenyl-2,3-di­hydro-4H-1,3-benzo­thia­zin-4-one and 0.95 ml of acetone and stirred. The benzo­thia­zinone did not fully dissolve. A 10 ml round-bottomed flask was charged with 0.1212 g of tri­phenyl­tin chloride and 2.0 ml of acetone and stirred. The contents of the 2 ml vial were added to the 10 ml flask and the vial was rinsed with an additional 0.5 ml of acetone, giving a clear solution, which was stirred for 2 h and then allowed to stand without stirring for 3 d. The solution was filtered through Celite and then concentrated under vacuum, giving a white solid. The solid was recrystallized from cyclo­hexane to give a yellow solid (yield 0.0755 g, 72%). Crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by slow evaporation from an acetone solution.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. The H atoms were placed geometrically and allowed to ride on their parent C atoms during refinement, with C—H distances of 0.98 (methine) or 0.93 Å (aromatic) and with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C). Although of no particular significance in this racemic compound, the enanti­omer chosen was the C1(S) one.
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC20H15NO2S
M r 333.39
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)9.1505 (16), 11.2712 (19), 16.379 (3)
β (°)103.997 (6)
V3)1639.2 (5)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.21
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.16 × 0.14
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker CCD area detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)
T min, T max 0.790, 0.9
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections12730, 4036, 3701
R int 0.025
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.668
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.090, 0.231, 1.65
No. of reflections4036
No. of parameters217
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.61, −0.34

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2001 ▸), SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▸), olex2.solve (Bourhis et al., 2015 ▸), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017010313/zs2384sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017010313/zs2384Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017010313/zs2384Isup3.mol Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017010313/zs2384Isup4.cml CCDC reference: 1561660 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C20H15NO2SF(000) = 696
Mr = 333.39Dx = 1.351 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 9.1505 (16) ÅCell parameters from 975 reflections
b = 11.2712 (19) Åθ = 2.9–28.1°
c = 16.379 (3) ŵ = 0.21 mm1
β = 103.997 (6)°T = 298 K
V = 1639.2 (5) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.20 × 0.16 × 0.14 mm
Bruker CCD area detector diffractometer4036 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube3701 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.025
phi and ω scansθmax = 28.4°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)h = −12→11
Tmin = 0.790, Tmax = 0.9k = −14→14
12730 measured reflectionsl = −21→21
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: iterative
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.090Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.231H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.65w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
4036 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
217 parametersΔρmax = 0.61 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.34 e Å3
Experimental. The data collection nominally covered a full sphere of reciprocal space by a combination of 4 sets of ω scans each set at different φ and/or 2θ angles and each scan (10 s exposure) covering -0.300° degrees in ω. The crystal to detector distance was 5.82 cm.
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.2072 (3)0.6272 (2)0.31199 (16)0.0321 (5)
H10.19590.56110.27200.039*
C20.3510 (3)0.8148 (2)0.32892 (15)0.0295 (5)
C30.3394 (3)0.8157 (2)0.41882 (15)0.0303 (5)
C40.3293 (3)0.7126 (2)0.46419 (16)0.0341 (6)
C50.3268 (3)0.7173 (3)0.54783 (18)0.0473 (7)
H50.32220.64770.57760.057*
C60.3311 (4)0.8261 (3)0.58734 (19)0.0516 (8)
H60.32980.82980.64390.062*
C70.3373 (3)0.9288 (3)0.54312 (18)0.0467 (7)
H70.33841.00190.56960.056*
C80.3420 (3)0.9239 (2)0.45941 (17)0.0384 (6)
H80.34700.99390.43010.046*
C90.0503 (3)0.6611 (2)0.31841 (15)0.0339 (6)
C10−0.0061 (3)0.7748 (3)0.30135 (18)0.0434 (7)
H100.05410.83380.28680.052*
C11−0.1521 (4)0.8012 (3)0.3059 (2)0.0562 (9)
H11−0.18960.87760.29380.067*
C12−0.2407 (4)0.7160 (4)0.3280 (2)0.0648 (10)
H12−0.33790.73460.33160.078*
C13−0.1875 (4)0.6036 (4)0.3447 (3)0.0673 (10)
H13−0.24850.54580.35990.081*
C14−0.0414 (4)0.5746 (3)0.3393 (2)0.0526 (8)
H14−0.00610.49740.34980.063*
C150.3197 (3)0.7045 (2)0.19894 (16)0.0320 (5)
C160.2398 (4)0.7703 (3)0.13225 (17)0.0446 (7)
H160.16420.82160.13930.053*
C170.2729 (5)0.7592 (3)0.05491 (19)0.0574 (9)
H170.21980.80380.00960.069*
C180.3845 (4)0.6825 (3)0.0442 (2)0.0582 (9)
H180.40820.6770−0.00770.070*
C190.4602 (4)0.6144 (3)0.1105 (2)0.0548 (8)
H190.53330.56100.10300.066*
C200.4279 (3)0.6249 (3)0.18879 (18)0.0430 (7)
H200.47870.57870.23380.052*
N10.2910 (2)0.71883 (18)0.28149 (13)0.0304 (5)
O10.4735 (2)0.5462 (2)0.39909 (15)0.0535 (6)
O20.4139 (2)0.89553 (17)0.30137 (12)0.0421 (5)
S10.32220 (8)0.57148 (6)0.41423 (4)0.0392 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0354 (12)0.0251 (11)0.0372 (13)−0.0058 (9)0.0112 (10)−0.0019 (10)
C20.0296 (11)0.0270 (11)0.0303 (12)0.0005 (9)0.0041 (9)0.0034 (9)
C30.0273 (11)0.0307 (12)0.0309 (13)−0.0032 (9)0.0032 (9)0.0014 (9)
C40.0332 (12)0.0328 (12)0.0351 (13)0.0028 (10)0.0059 (10)0.0033 (10)
C50.0507 (16)0.0536 (17)0.0366 (15)0.0039 (13)0.0087 (12)0.0134 (13)
C60.0555 (18)0.068 (2)0.0303 (14)0.0079 (15)0.0083 (13)−0.0011 (14)
C70.0493 (16)0.0513 (17)0.0372 (15)0.0007 (13)0.0062 (12)−0.0131 (13)
C80.0415 (14)0.0347 (14)0.0370 (14)−0.0045 (10)0.0058 (11)−0.0013 (11)
C90.0342 (12)0.0395 (14)0.0284 (12)−0.0097 (10)0.0079 (10)−0.0089 (10)
C100.0387 (14)0.0467 (15)0.0431 (15)0.0005 (12)0.0065 (12)−0.0077 (13)
C110.0443 (17)0.070 (2)0.0495 (18)0.0094 (15)0.0029 (14)−0.0180 (16)
C120.0364 (15)0.101 (3)0.058 (2)−0.0051 (18)0.0132 (14)−0.032 (2)
C130.0468 (18)0.089 (3)0.072 (2)−0.0270 (19)0.0265 (17)−0.011 (2)
C140.0475 (16)0.0529 (19)0.0606 (19)−0.0145 (14)0.0196 (15)−0.0049 (15)
C150.0343 (12)0.0315 (12)0.0312 (12)−0.0057 (9)0.0101 (10)−0.0017 (10)
C160.0587 (18)0.0383 (14)0.0378 (15)0.0025 (12)0.0136 (13)0.0016 (12)
C170.085 (2)0.0500 (18)0.0366 (16)−0.0038 (17)0.0139 (15)0.0080 (14)
C180.078 (2)0.063 (2)0.0414 (17)−0.0122 (17)0.0293 (17)−0.0071 (15)
C190.0516 (18)0.065 (2)0.0541 (19)0.0021 (15)0.0252 (15)−0.0110 (16)
C200.0379 (14)0.0530 (17)0.0380 (15)0.0047 (12)0.0089 (11)−0.0052 (12)
N10.0350 (10)0.0270 (10)0.0305 (10)−0.0046 (8)0.0106 (8)−0.0016 (8)
O10.0475 (12)0.0473 (12)0.0673 (14)0.0153 (9)0.0169 (10)0.0093 (10)
O20.0545 (12)0.0346 (10)0.0385 (10)−0.0164 (8)0.0139 (9)0.0009 (8)
S10.0453 (4)0.0278 (4)0.0463 (4)0.0023 (2)0.0145 (3)0.0098 (3)
C1—H10.9800C10—C111.388 (4)
C1—C91.514 (3)C11—H110.9300
C1—N11.446 (3)C11—C121.361 (5)
C1—S11.858 (3)C12—H120.9300
C2—C31.502 (3)C12—C131.361 (6)
C2—N11.367 (3)C13—H130.9300
C2—O21.220 (3)C13—C141.400 (5)
C3—C41.394 (3)C14—H140.9300
C3—C81.386 (3)C15—C161.375 (4)
C4—C51.377 (4)C15—C201.375 (4)
C4—S11.783 (3)C15—N11.447 (3)
C5—H50.9300C16—H160.9300
C5—C61.383 (4)C16—C171.378 (4)
C6—H60.9300C17—H170.9300
C6—C71.374 (4)C17—C181.381 (5)
C7—H70.9300C18—H180.9300
C7—C81.383 (4)C18—C191.373 (5)
C8—H80.9300C19—H190.9300
C9—C101.384 (4)C19—C201.389 (4)
C9—C141.383 (4)C20—H200.9300
C10—H100.9300O1—S11.491 (2)
C9—C1—H1106.9C12—C11—H11119.8
C9—C1—S1111.28 (17)C11—C12—H12119.9
N1—C1—H1106.9C13—C12—C11120.2 (3)
N1—C1—C9115.8 (2)C13—C12—H12119.9
N1—C1—S1108.68 (16)C12—C13—H13119.8
S1—C1—H1106.9C12—C13—C14120.4 (3)
N1—C2—C3116.7 (2)C14—C13—H13119.8
O2—C2—C3120.6 (2)C9—C14—C13119.8 (3)
O2—C2—N1122.7 (2)C9—C14—H14120.1
C4—C3—C2123.1 (2)C13—C14—H14120.1
C8—C3—C2118.6 (2)C16—C15—N1120.0 (2)
C8—C3—C4118.3 (2)C20—C15—C16121.0 (3)
C3—C4—S1119.9 (2)C20—C15—N1119.0 (2)
C5—C4—C3121.2 (2)C15—C16—H16120.4
C5—C4—S1118.9 (2)C15—C16—C17119.2 (3)
C4—C5—H5120.2C17—C16—H16120.4
C4—C5—C6119.6 (3)C16—C17—H17119.8
C6—C5—H5120.2C16—C17—C18120.5 (3)
C5—C6—H6120.0C18—C17—H17119.8
C7—C6—C5120.0 (3)C17—C18—H18120.1
C7—C6—H6120.0C19—C18—C17119.8 (3)
C6—C7—H7119.9C19—C18—H18120.1
C6—C7—C8120.3 (3)C18—C19—H19119.9
C8—C7—H7119.9C18—C19—C20120.2 (3)
C3—C8—H8119.7C20—C19—H19119.9
C7—C8—C3120.6 (2)C15—C20—C19119.2 (3)
C7—C8—H8119.7C15—C20—H20120.4
C10—C9—C1122.2 (2)C19—C20—H20120.4
C14—C9—C1118.8 (3)C1—N1—C15118.32 (19)
C14—C9—C10119.0 (3)C2—N1—C1122.9 (2)
C9—C10—H10119.9C2—N1—C15118.7 (2)
C9—C10—C11120.3 (3)C4—S1—C193.56 (11)
C11—C10—H10119.9O1—S1—C1105.12 (12)
C10—C11—H11119.8O1—S1—C4108.31 (13)
C12—C11—C10120.4 (3)
C1—C9—C10—C11178.3 (2)C15—C16—C17—C180.4 (5)
C1—C9—C14—C13−179.3 (3)C16—C15—C20—C192.4 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5176.6 (2)C16—C15—N1—C1105.0 (3)
C2—C3—C4—S1−2.5 (3)C16—C15—N1—C2−78.4 (3)
C2—C3—C8—C7−177.6 (2)C16—C17—C18—C191.7 (5)
C3—C2—N1—C15.9 (3)C17—C18—C19—C20−1.9 (5)
C3—C2—N1—C15−170.5 (2)C18—C19—C20—C15−0.2 (5)
C3—C4—C5—C61.3 (4)C20—C15—C16—C17−2.5 (4)
C3—C4—S1—C1−36.3 (2)C20—C15—N1—C1−75.2 (3)
C3—C4—S1—O170.9 (2)C20—C15—N1—C2101.3 (3)
C4—C3—C8—C71.1 (4)N1—C1—C9—C10−4.0 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C70.3 (5)N1—C1—C9—C14173.9 (2)
C5—C4—S1—C1144.5 (2)N1—C1—S1—C460.72 (18)
C5—C4—S1—O1−108.3 (2)N1—C1—S1—O1−49.3 (2)
C5—C6—C7—C8−1.2 (5)N1—C2—C3—C426.3 (3)
C6—C7—C8—C30.5 (4)N1—C2—C3—C8−155.1 (2)
C8—C3—C4—C5−2.0 (4)N1—C15—C16—C17177.3 (3)
C8—C3—C4—S1178.89 (19)N1—C15—C20—C19−177.4 (2)
C9—C1—N1—C273.2 (3)O2—C2—C3—C4−152.3 (3)
C9—C1—N1—C15−110.4 (2)O2—C2—C3—C826.3 (3)
C9—C1—S1—C4−67.89 (18)O2—C2—N1—C1−175.5 (2)
C9—C1—S1—O1−177.94 (17)O2—C2—N1—C158.1 (4)
C9—C10—C11—C120.7 (4)S1—C1—C9—C10120.8 (2)
C10—C9—C14—C13−1.4 (4)S1—C1—C9—C14−61.4 (3)
C10—C11—C12—C13−0.8 (5)S1—C1—N1—C2−52.8 (3)
C11—C12—C13—C14−0.1 (6)S1—C1—N1—C15123.56 (19)
C12—C13—C14—C91.3 (5)S1—C4—C5—C6−179.5 (2)
C14—C9—C10—C110.5 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C1—H1···O2i0.982.313.240 (3)157
  10 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel (E)-α-benzylsulfonyl chalcone derivatives as potential BRAF inhibitors.

Authors:  Qing-Shan Li; Cui-Yun Li; Xiang Lu; Hui Zhang; Hai-Liang Zhu
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Synthesis of seven-membered iminosugars fused thiazolidin-4-one and benzthiazinan-4-one and their HIV-RT inhibitory activity.

Authors:  Yuheng Hou; Shunkai Xing; Jie Shao; Zhuqing Yin; Le Hao; Tianyu Yang; Hongzhi Zhang; Mo Zhu; Hua Chen; Xiaoliu Li
Journal:  Carbohydr Res       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Design and synthesis of new 1,3-benzthiazinan-4-one derivatives as selective cyclooxygenase (COX-2) inhibitors.

Authors:  Afshin Zarghi; Tannaz Zebardast; Bahram Daraie; Mehdi Hedayati
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Synthesis, antitumor activity and molecular docking study of novel sulfonamide-Schiff's bases, thiazolidinones, benzothiazinones and their C-nucleoside derivatives.

Authors:  Mohsen M Kamel; Hamed I Ali; Manal M Anwar; Neama A Mohamed; Abdelmohsen M Soliman
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Synthesis and antiproliferative activity of 2-aryl-4-oxo-thiazolidin-3-yl-amides for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Veeresa Gududuru; Eunju Hurh; James T Dalton; Duane D Miller
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Scaffold Diversity Inspired by the Natural Product Evodiamine: Discovery of Highly Potent and Multitargeting Antitumor Agents.

Authors:  Shengzheng Wang; Kun Fang; Guoqiang Dong; Shuqiang Chen; Na Liu; Zhenyuan Miao; Jianzhong Yao; Jian Li; Wannian Zhang; Chunquan Sheng
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Synthesis and in vitro antimalarial testing of neocryptolepines: SAR study for improved activity by introduction and modifications of side chains at C2 and C11 on indolo[2,3-b]quinolines.

Authors:  Zhen-Wu Mei; Li Wang; Wen-Jie Lu; Cui-Qing Pang; Tsukasa Maeda; Wei Peng; Marcel Kaiser; Ibrahim El Sayed; Tsutomu Inokuchi
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  2,3-Diphenyl-2,3-di-hydro-4H-1,3-benzo-thia-zin-4-one.

Authors:  Hemant P Yennawar; Ryan V Bendinsky; David J Coyle; Aaron S Cali; Lee J Silverberg
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-03-22

10.  The anatomy of a comprehensive constrained, restrained refinement program for the modern computing environment - Olex2 dissected.

Authors:  Luc J Bourhis; Oleg V Dolomanov; Richard J Gildea; Judith A K Howard; Horst Puschmann
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.