| Literature DB >> 28932255 |
Amit Arora1,2,3,4, Narendar Manohar1, Andrew Hayen5, Sameer Bhole3,6, John Eastwood7, Steven Levy8, Jane Anne Scott9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding has short-term and long-term benefits for both the infant and the mother. The objective of this study was to identify the incidence of breastfeeding initiation among women in South Western Sydney, and the factors associated with the initiation of breastfeeding.Entities:
Keywords: Australia; Breastfeeding; Cohort study; Sydney; initiation
Year: 2017 PMID: 28932255 PMCID: PMC5602913 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-017-0130-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Breastfeed J ISSN: 1746-4358 Impact factor: 3.461
Association between socio-demographic, biomedical, and psychosocial factors and breastfeeding initiation (n = 935)
| Variable | Breastfeeding Initiationa | Univariate odds ratiob | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||
| N (%) | N (%) | OR | 95%CI | |
| Sociodemographic factors | ||||
| Maternal age (years) | ||||
| < 25 | 84 (90.3) | 9 (9.7) | 1.00 | |
| 25–29 | 235 (92.2) | 20 (7.8) | 1.26 | 0.55, 2.87 |
| 30–34 | 323 (92.0) | 28 (8.0) | 1.24 | 0.56, 2.72 |
| ≥ 35 | 218 (92.4) | 18 (7.6) | 1.30 | 0.56, 3.00 |
| Maternal education | ||||
| < Year 12 | 114 (80.9) | 27 (19.1) | 1.00 | |
| Year 12 completed | 182 (87.5) | 26 (12.5) | 1.66 | 0.92, 2.98 |
| College/TAFE | 169 (94.4) | 10 (5.6) | 4.00 | 1.86, 8.59** |
| University | 395 (97.1) | 12 (2.9) | 7.80 | 3.83, 15.88** |
| Marital status | ||||
| Married | 689 (93.9) | 45 (6.1) | 1.00 | |
| Living with a partner/ De facto | 98 (89.1) | 12 (10.9) | 0.53 | 0.27, 1.04 |
| Single mother | 73 (80.2) | 18 (19.8) | 0.26 | 0.15, 0.48** |
| Mother’s occupation | ||||
| Home duties/ student | 148 (87.1) | 22 (12.9) | 1.00 | |
| Unskilled | 152 (89.9) | 17 (10.1) | 1.33 | 0.68, 2.60 |
| Sales/Clerical | 268 (91.2) | 26 (8.8) | 1.53 | 0.84, 2.80 |
| Managers | 58 (95.1) | 3 (4.9) | 2.87 | 0.83, 9.97 |
| Professionals | 234 (97.1) | 7 (2.9) | 4.97 | 2.07, 11.92** |
| Mother’s country of birth | ||||
| Australia | 398 (91.3) | 38 (8.7) | 1.00 | |
| China | 55 (96.5) | 2 (3.5) | 2.63 | 0.62, 11.19 |
| Vietnam | 117 (88.6) | 15 (11.4) | 0.74 | 0.40, 1.40 |
| Asia other | 109 (98.2) | 2 (1.8) | 5.20 | 1.24, 21.91* |
| Middle East/Africa | 77 (95.1) | 4 (4.9) | 1.84 | 0.64, 5.30 |
| Others | 103 (88.0) | 14 (12.0) | 0.70 | 0.37, 1.34 |
| Partner’s country of birth | ||||
| Australia | 327 (91.1) | 32 (8.9) | 1.00 | |
| China | 41 (97.6) | 1 (2.4) | 4.01 | 0.53, 30.14 |
| Vietnam | 103 (89.6) | 12 (10.4) | 0.84 | 0.42, 1.69 |
| Asia other | 101 (96.2) | 4 (3.8) | 2.47 | 0.85, 7.15 |
| Middle East/Africa | 93 (96.9) | 3 (3.1) | 3.03 | 0.91, 10.13 |
| Others | 110 (91.7) | 10 (8.3) | 1.08 | 0.51, 2.26 |
| Mother intended to be employed/study at 6 months post-partum | ||||
| No/Undecided | 672 (91.4) | 63 (8.6) | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 188 (94.0) | 12 (6.0) | 1.47 | 0.78, 2.78 |
| Index for relative socioeconomic disadvantage | ||||
| Least disadvantaged | 48 (96.0) | 2 (4.0) | 1.00 | |
| 2nd quintile | 223 (93.7) | 15 (6.3) | 0.62 | 0.14, 2.80 |
| 3rd quintile | 77 (96.3) | 3 (3.8) | 1.07 | 0.17, 6.63 |
| 4th quintile | 162 (88.5) | 21 (11.5) | 0.32 | 0.07, 1.42 |
| Most disadvantaged | 350 (91.1) | 34 (8.9) | 0.43 | 0.10, 1.84 |
| Biomedical factors | ||||
| Parity | ||||
| Primiparous | 444 (94.9) | 24 (5.1) | 1.00 | |
| Multiparous | 416 (89.1) | 51 (10.9) | 0.44 | 0.27, 0.73* |
| Infant gender | ||||
| Female | 421 (91.9) | 37 (8.1) | 1.00 | |
| Male | 439 (92.0) | 38 (8.0) | 1.02 | 0.63, 1.63 |
| Infant birth weight | ||||
| Average or greater (≥ 2500 g) | 819 (92.1) | 70 (7.9) | 1.00 | |
| Low (<2500 g) | 41 (89.1) | 5 (10.9) | 0.70 | 0.27, 1.83 |
| Method of delivery | ||||
| Vaginal | 618 (94.6) | 35 (5.4) | 1.00 | |
| Caesarean | 242 (85.8) | 40 (14.2) | 0.34 | 0.21, 0.55** |
| Smoking status of the mother during pregnancy | ||||
| No | 821 (92.9) | 63 (7.1) | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 39 (76.5) | 12 (23.5) | 0.25 | 0.12, 0.50** |
| Alcohol drinking status of the mother during pregnancy | ||||
| No | 785 (93.1) | 58 (6.9) | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 75 (81.5) | 17 (18.5) | 0.33 | 0.18, 0.59** |
| Psychosocial factors | ||||
| Partner prefers breastfeeding | ||||
| No or ambivalent | 204 (82.3) | 44 (17.7) | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 562 (97.7) | 13 (2.3) | 9.32 | 4.92, 17.67** |
| Infant feeding decision made before pregnancy | ||||
| No | 128 (87.1) | 19 (12.9) | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 732 (92.9) | 56 (7.1) | 1.94 | 1.12, 3.37* |
OR Odds ratio, 95%CI 95% confidence interval
a The total of the categories do not always add up to 935 due to missing or incomplete data for some items
b The univariate odds ratio indicates the likelihood of being breastfed ever
* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.001
Sociodemographic and biomedical characteristics of the participants (n = 935)
| Characteristic | Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Sociodemographic factors | ||
| Maternal age (years) | ||
| < 25 | 93 | 9.9 |
| 25–29 | 255 | 27.3 |
| 30–34 | 351 | 37.5 |
| ≥ 35 | 236 | 25.2 |
| Maternal education | ||
| < Year 12 | 141 | 15.1 |
| Year 12 completed | 208 | 22.2 |
| College/TAFE | 179 | 19.1 |
| University | 407 | 43.5 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 734 | 78.5 |
| Living with a partner/ De facto | 110 | 11.8 |
| Single Mother | 91 | 9.7 |
| Mother’s occupation | ||
| Home duties/ student | 170 | 18.2 |
| Managers | 61 | 6.5 |
| Professionals | 241 | 25.8 |
| Sales/Clerical | 294 | 31.4 |
| Unskilled | 169 | 18.1 |
| Mother’s country of birth | ||
| Australia | 436 | 46.6 |
| China | 57 | 6.1 |
| Vietnam | 132 | 14.1 |
| Asia other | 111 | 11.9 |
| Middle East/Africa | 81 | 8.7 |
| Others | 117 | 12.5 |
| Partner’s country of birth | ||
| Australia | 359 | 38.4 |
| China | 42 | 4.5 |
| Vietnam | 115 | 12.3 |
| Asia Other | 105 | 11.2 |
| Middle East/Africa | 96 | 10.3 |
| Others | 120 | 12.8 |
| Index for relative socioeconomic disadvantage | ||
| Least Disadvantaged | 50 | 5.3 |
| 2nd Quintile | 238 | 25.5 |
| 3rd Quintile | 80 | 8.6 |
| 4th Quintile | 183 | 19.6 |
| Most Disadvantaged | 384 | 41.1 |
| Biomedical factors | ||
| Parity | ||
| Primiparous | 468 | 50.1 |
| Multiparous | 467 | 49.9 |
| Infant gender | ||
| Female | 458 | 49.0 |
| Male | 477 | 51.0 |
| Infant birth weight | ||
| Average or greater | 889 | 95.1 |
| Low | 46 | 4.9 |
| Smoking status of the mother post partum | ||
| No | 852 | 91.1 |
| Yes | 83 | 8.9 |
| Smoking status of the mother during pregnancy | ||
| No | 884 | 94.5 |
| Yes | 51 | 5.5 |
| Alcohol drinking status of the mother post partum | ||
| No | 633 | 67.7 |
| Yes | 302 | 32.3 |
| Alcohol drinking status of the mother during pregnancy | ||
| No | 843 | 90.2 |
| Yes | 92 | 9.8 |
| Method of delivery | ||
| Vaginal | 653 | 69.8 |
| Caesarean | 282 | 30.2 |
Factors independentlya associated with initiation of breastfeeding after adjustment for potential confoundersb (n = 822)
| Variable | Ever initiated breastfeeding | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| AdjORc | 95%CI |
| |
| Sociodemographic factors | |||
| Maternal education | |||
| < Year 12 | 1.00 | ||
| Year 12 completed | 1.36 | 0.56, 3.31 | 0.498 |
| College/TAFE | 2.28 | 0.84, 6.16 | 0.105 |
| University | 7.16 | 2.73, 18.79 | <0.001 |
| Mother’s country of birth | |||
| Australia | 1.00 | ||
| China | 0.75 | 0.15, 3.74 | 0.729 |
| Vietnam | 0.34 | 0.13, 0.87 | 0.025 |
| Asia other | 1.93 | 0.41, 9.09 | 0.406 |
| Middle East/Africa | 1.86 | 0.51, 6.81 | 0.348 |
| Others | 0.41 | 0.17, 1.00 | 0.050 |
| Biomedical factors | |||
| Parity | |||
| Primiparous | 1.00 | ||
| Multiparous | 0.38 | 0.19, 0.79 | 0.010 |
| Method of delivery | |||
| Vaginal | 1.00 | ||
| Caesarean | 0.27 | 0.14, 0.52 | <0.001 |
| Alcohol drinking status of the mother during pregnancy | |||
| No | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 0.28 | 0.11, 0.71 | 0.008 |
| Psychosocial factors | |||
| Partner prefers breastfeeding | |||
| No or ambivalent | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 11.77 | 5.73, 24.15 | <0.001 |
| Infant feeding decision made before pregnancy | |||
| No | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 2.80 | 1.31, 5.97 | 0.008 |
a All variables in the final model were variables for which, when excluded, the change in deviance compared with the corresponding χ2 test statistic
on the relevant degrees of freedom was significant
b Adjusted for maternal age, marital status, maternal occupation, father’s country of birth, mother’s future employment intentions,
index of relative socioeconomic disadvantage, infant gender, infant birth weight, smoking status of the mother during pregnancy
c AdjOR Adjusted Odds Ratio, 95%CI 95% confidence interval