| Literature DB >> 28931975 |
Kenji Tsunoda1, Hirotaka Mutsuzaki2, Kazushi Hotta3, Yukiyo Shimizu4, Naruki Kitano5, Yasuyoshi Wadano6.
Abstract
[Purpose] Although some studies suggest the importance of getting adequate sleep for enhancing mood, there is not yet sufficient evidence on the relationship between sleep and mood states in athletes, especially for athletes with physical disability. The purpose of this study is to reveal relationships between sleep and psychological mood states in female wheelchair basketball players.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptive sports; Insomnia; Wheelchair sports
Year: 2017 PMID: 28931975 PMCID: PMC5599808 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.29.1497
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Characteristics of the sample of female wheelchair basketball players
| Age (years) | 30.9 ± 9.4 | |
| Type of disease, n (%) | ||
| Central nervous system | 10 (58.8) | |
| Skeletal system | 7 (41.2) | |
| Ability class in wheelchair basketball (points) | 2.8 ± 1.3 | |
| Sleep items on PSQI | ||
| Sleep quality (fairly bad/very bad), n (%) | 6 (35.3) | |
| Sleep latency (min) | 17.6 ± 28.5 | |
| Sleep duration (hours) | 5.9 ± 1.0 | |
| Sleep efficiency (%) | 90.0 ± 11.3 | |
| Sleep disturbances (range: 0–27) | 2.4 ± 2.7 | |
| Daytime dysfunction (range: 0–6) | 1.1 ± 1.2 | |
| PSQI score | 5.4 ± 2.6 | |
| Insomnia (PSQI >5.5 points), n (%) | 9 (52.9) | |
| T scores of POMS-SF† | ||
| Tension | 45.7 ± 6.7 | |
| Depression | 47.4 ± 6.4 | |
| Anger | 46.2 ± 8.4 | |
| Vigor | 48.6 ± 9.6 | |
| Fatigue | 45.8 ± 7.5 | |
| Confusion | 45.4 ± 7.5 | |
PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; higher scores indicate poorer sleep. POMS-SF: Short form of the Profile of Mood States. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, unless indicated otherwise. †Higher scores on any variable except vigor indicate undesirable mood states.
Differences in sleep states between the general Japanese female population and the sample of female wheelchair basketball players
| Japanese women | Study participants | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Component scores of the PSQI | |||
| Sleep quality | 1.00 ± 0.65 | 1.24 ± 0.83 | |
| Sleep latency | 0.79 ± 0.84 | 0.88 ± 0.93 | |
| Sleep duration | 1.05 ± 0.78 | 1.71 ± 0.77* | |
| Sleep efficiency | 0.05 ± 0.31 | 0.35 ± 0.86* | |
| Sleep disturbance | 0.78 ± 0.51 | 0.59 ± 0.51 | |
| Hypnotic medication use | 0.07 ± 0.44 | – | |
| Daytime dysfunction | 0.70 ± 0.67 | 0.65 ± 0.70 | |
| Total PSQI score | 4.44 ± 2.09 | 5.41 ± 2.60 | |
PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Each range of component scores is converted to 0 to 3 based on the scoring algorithm of the PSQI15). Higher scores on each variable indicate poor sleep states. Users of hypnotic medications were excluded from the study. *p<0.05 †Data obtained from Doi et al.17)
Rank correlations between sleep and mood states in the sample of female wheelchair basketball players
| Tension | Depression | Anger | Vigor | Fatigue | Confusion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep quality (range: 0–3)† | 0.06 | 0.45 | 0.10 | –0.44 | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| Sleep latency (min)† | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.04 | –0.48 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| Sleep duration (hours) | –0.20 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.19 | –0.33 | 0.29 |
| Sleep efficiency (%) | 0.21 | 0.15 | –0.04 | 0.58* | –0.21 | 0.05 |
| Sleep disturbances (range: 0–27)† | –0.44 | 0.31 | –0.34 | –0.58* | 0.14 | 0.41 |
| Daytime dysfunction (range: 0–6)† | 0.50* | 0.38 | 0.39 | –0.17 | 0.26 | 0.27 |
| PSQI score (range: 0–21)† | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.14 | –0.51* | 0.25 | –0.06 |
PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. *p<0.05 †Higher scores on each variable indicate poorer sleep states.