Literature DB >> 28931699

Adoption of Telehealth: Remote Biometric Monitoring Among Peritoneal Dialysis Patients in the United States.

Susie Q Lew1, Neal Sikka2, Clinton Thompson3, Teena Cherian4, Manya Magnus3.   

Abstract

We examined participant uptake and utilization of remote monitoring devices, and the relationship between remote biometric monitoring (RBM) of weight (Wt) and blood pressure (BP) with self-monitoring requirements. Participants on peritoneal dialysis (PD) (n = 269) participated in a Telehealth pilot study of which 253 used remote monitoring of BP and 255 for Wt. Blood pressure and Wt readings were transmitted in real time to a Telehealth call center, which were then forwarded to the PD nurses for real-time review. Uptake of RBM was substantial, with 89.7% accepting RBM, generating 74,266 BP and 52,880 Wt measurements over the study period. We found no significant correlates of RBM uptake with regard to gender, marital, educational, socio-economic or employment status, or baseline experience with computers; frequency of use of BP RBM by Black participants was less than non-Black participants, as was Wt RBM, and participants over 55 years old were more likely to use the Wt RBM than their younger counterparts. Having any review of the breach by a nurse was associated with reduced odds of a subsequent BP breach after adjusting for sex, age, and race. Remote biometric monitoring was associated with adherence to self-monitoring BP and Wt requirements associated with PD. Remote biometric monitoring was feasible, allowing for increased communication between patient and PD clinical staff with real-time patient data for providers to act on to potentially improve adherence and outcomes.
Copyright © 2017 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Telehealth; adherence; blood pressure; peritoneal dialysis; remote monitoring; weight

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28931699     DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  6 in total

Review 1.  Perspectives from the Kidney Health Initiative on Advancing Technologies to Facilitate Remote Monitoring of Patient Self-Care in RRT.

Authors:  Mitchell H Rosner; Susie Q Lew; Paul Conway; Jennifer Ehrlich; Robert Jarrin; Uptal D Patel; Karen Rheuban; R Brooks Robey; Neal Sikka; Eric Wallace; Patrick Brophy; James Sloand
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Interventions to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Indigenous or Remote Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  N Ovtcharenko; B K A Thomson
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2019-11-14

3.  Patient and Clinician Perspectives on the use of Remote Patient Monitoring in Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Talbot; Sara Farnbach; Allison Tong; Steve Chadban; Shaundeep Sen; Vincent Garvey; Martin Gallagher; John Knight
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2022-03-21

4.  Challenges for Peritoneal Dialysis Centers Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico.

Authors:  Diana Perez-Moran; Ricardo Perez-Cuevas; Svetlana V Doubova
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 8.323

Review 5.  Opportunities in the cloud or pie in the sky? Current status and future perspectives of telemedicine in nephrology.

Authors:  Madelena Stauss; Lauren Floyd; Stefan Becker; Arvind Ponnusamy; Alexander Woywodt
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2020-08-14

6.  Telehealth for Home Dialysis in COVID-19 and Beyond: A Perspective From the American Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Home Dialysis Subcommittee.

Authors:  Susie Q Lew; Eric L Wallace; Vesh Srivatana; Bradley A Warady; Suzanne Watnick; Jayson Hood; David L White; Vikram Aggarwal; Caroline Wilkie; Mihran V Naljayan; Mary Gellens; Jeffrey Perl; Martin J Schreiber
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 8.860

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.