Literature DB >> 28931260

Stereotactic Accuracy and Surgical Utility of the O-Arm in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.

Jonathan Dennis Carlson1, Kate Elizabeth McLeod1, Pamela Sue McLeod1, Jamelynn Brooke Mark2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The stereotactic accuracy of intraoperative imaging is critical to clinical outcome, particularly in "asleep" deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery that typically forgoes neurophysiological techniques. Different intraoperative imaging modalities and associated accuracies have been reported, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and O-arm.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze intraoperative O-arm imaging accuracy and to evaluate the utility of microelectrode mapping.
METHODS: O-arm images of DBS electrodes were collected during implantation in the subthalamic nucleus in patients with Parkinson disease. Images were fused to postoperative MRI and postoperative CT scans. Stereotactic coordinates for the electrode tip were measured independently. Radial distances between the images were compared. The impact of microelectrode mapping on final DBS electrode positioning was also evaluated.
RESULTS: In 71 consecutive DBS electrodes, the average radial error of the electrode tip between the O-arm and MRI was 1.55 ± 0.58 mm. The average radial error between the O-arm and CT was 1.03 ± 0.61 mm. Thus, the O-arm images accurately depicted the position of the electrode. However, in 14% of cases, microelectrode mapping revised the DBS electrode position beyond the preoperative direct target in combination with accurate intraoperative imaging.
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative O-arm images reliably and accurately displayed the location of the DBS electrode compared with postoperative CT and MRI images. Microelectrode mapping provided superior subnuclear resolution to imaging. Both intraoperative imaging and microelectrode mapping are effective tools that can be synergistically combined for optimal DBS electrode placement.
Copyright © 2016 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone-beam computed tomography; Deep brain stimulation; Intraoperative procedures; Microelectrodes; Subthalamic nucleus

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28931260     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 2332-4252            Impact factor:   2.703


  5 in total

1.  Implementation of Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (O-arm) for Stereotactic Imaging During Deep Brain Stimulation Procedures.

Authors:  Rozemarije A Holewijn; Maarten Bot; Pepijn van den Munckhof; P Richard Schuurman
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.703

2.  Comparison of Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Fluoroscopy With Standard Computed Tomography for Stereotactic Frame Registration.

Authors:  Terrance Peng; Daniel R Kramer; Morgan B Lee; Michael F Barbaro; Li Ding; Charles Y Liu; Spencer Kellis; Brian Lee
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.703

3.  Frameless x-ray-based lead re-implantation after partial hardware removal of deep brain stimulation system with preservation of intracerebral trajectories.

Authors:  Vesna Malinova; Dariusz J Jaskólski; Rafal Wójcik; Dorothee Mielke; Veit Rohde
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Accuracy of Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Deep Brain Stimulation-A Prospective Noninferiority Study.

Authors:  Naomi I Kremer; D L Marinus Oterdoom; Peter Jan van Laar; Dan Piña-Fuentes; Teus van Laar; Gea Drost; Arjen L J van Hulzen; J Marc C van Dijk
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-01-10

5.  Intraoperative CT and cone-beam CT imaging for minimally invasive evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Nils Hecht; Marcus Czabanka; Paul Kendlbacher; Julia-Helene Raff; Georg Bohner; Peter Vajkoczy
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.216

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.