Literature DB >> 28931142

Malaria prevention strategies and recommendations, from chemoprophylaxis to stand-by emergency treatment: a 10-year prospective study in a Swiss Travel Clinic.

Rim Boubaker1, Annie Hérard Fossati1, Pierrette Meige1, Catherine Mialet1, Chantal Ngarambe Buffat1, Jacynthe Rochat1, Manisinh Souvannaraj-Blanchant1, Mediatrice Uwanyiligira1, Francine Widmer1, Sylvie Payot1, Laurence Rochat1, Serge de Vallière1,2, Valérie D'Acremont1,3, Blaise Genton1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are several possible malaria prevention strategies for travellers. In Switzerland, chemoprophylaxis (CP) is recommended for persons visiting areas highly endemic for malaria and stand-by emergency treatment (SBET) for areas with moderate to low risk.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the type of malaria prevention prescribed to travel clinic attendees with a specific focus on changes over time following adaptation of recommendations.
METHODS: All pre-travel first consultation data recorded between November 2002 and December 2012 were included. Country-specific malaria preventive recommendations provided and medicines prescribed over time were analysed.
RESULTS: In total, 64 858 client-trips were recorded. 91% of travellers planned to visit a malaria endemic country. Among those clients, 42% were prescribed an antimalarial medicine as CP only, 36% as SBET only, and 3% both. Between 2002 and 2012, there was a 16% drop of CP prescription ( P  < 0.001) and a 21% increase of SBET prescription ( P  < 0.001). Among travellers receiving CP, the proportion of those prescribed mefloquine dropped from 82% in 2002 to 46% in 2012 while those prescribed atovaquone-proguanil (AP) increased from 7% to 39%. For those prescribed SBET, the proportion dropped from 46% to 30% for AP and increased from 2% to 61% for artemether-lumefantrine. CP prescription for travellers to India fell from 62% to 5% and SBET prescription increased from 40% to 88% after the change of recommendation from CP to SBET in 2005 for this country. Comparatively, CP prescription for travellers to Senegal, for which no change of recommendation occurred, remained relatively stable between 88% in 2002 and 89% in 2012.
CONCLUSION: This study shows the considerable decline of antimalarial prescription for chemoprophylaxis that occurred over the 10-year period in favour of SBET. © International Society of Travel Medicine, 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  Malaria; chemoprophylaxis; prevention; recommendations; risk; stand-by emergency treatment; travellers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28931142     DOI: 10.1093/jtm/tax043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Travel Med        ISSN: 1195-1982            Impact factor:   8.490


  2 in total

1.  Stand-by emergency treatment (SBET) of malaria in Spanish travellers: a cohort study.

Authors:  Pietro Ferrara; Cristina Masuet-Aumatell; Fernando Agüero; Josep Maria Ramon-Torrell
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.979

2.  Tafenoquine for travelers' malaria: evidence, rationale and recommendations.

Authors:  J Kevin Baird
Journal:  J Travel Med       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 8.490

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.