Literature DB >> 28930947

The "mortality ascent": Hourly risk of death for hemodynamically unstable trauma patients at Level II versus Level I trauma centers.

Juan Pablo Herrera-Escobar1, Arturo J Rios-Diaz, Cheryl K Zogg, Lindsey L Wolf, Alyssa Harlow, Eric B Schneider, Zara Cooper, Carlos Alberto Ordonez, Ali Salim, Adil H Haider.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severely injured trauma patients have higher in-hospital mortality at Level II versus Level I trauma centers (TCs). To better understand these differences, we sought to determine if there were any periods during which hemodynamically unstable trauma patients are at higher risk of death at Level II versus Level I TCs within the first 24 hours postadmission. STUDY
DESIGN: Trauma patients aged 18 years to 64 years, with Injury Severity Score of 15 or greater, systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg at admission, and treated at Level II or Level I TCs, were identified using the 2007 to 2012 National Trauma Data Bank. Burn patients, transfers, and patients dead on arrival were excluded. Log-binomial regression models, adjusted for patient- and hospital-level confounders, were used to compare mortality at Level II versus Level I TCs over the first 24 hours postadmission.
RESULTS: Of 13,846 hemodynamically unstable patients, 4,212 (30.4%) were treated at 149 Level II TCs, and 9,634 (69.6%) at 116 Level I TCs. Within the first 24 hours, 3,059 (22.1%) patients died. In risk-adjusted models, mortality risk was significantly elevated at Level II versus Level I TCs during the 24 hours postadmission (relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.16). Hourly mortality risk was significantly different between Level II and Level I TCs during 4 hours to 7 hours postadmission, with a maximal difference at 7 hours (relative risk, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.36) and comparable mortality risk beyond 7 hours postadmission.
CONCLUSION: The 4-hour to 7-hour time window postadmission is critical for hemodynamically unstable trauma patients. Variations in available treatment modalities may account for higher relative mortality at Level II TCs during this time. Further investigation to elucidate specific risk factors for mortality during this period may lead to reductions in in-hospital mortality among hemodynamically unstable trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28930947     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  3 in total

1.  Chest Trauma Outcomes: Public Versus Private Level I Trauma Centers.

Authors:  Claudia P Orlas; Juan Pablo Herrera-Escobar; Cheryl K Zogg; José J Serna; Juan J Meléndez; Alexandra Gómez; Diana Martínez; Michael W Parra; Alberto F García; Fernando Rosso; Luis Fernando Pino; Adolfo Gonzalez; Carlos A Ordoñez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Positive Fluid Balance and Association with Post-Traumatic Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Gabrielle E Hatton; Reginald E Du; Shuyan Wei; John A Harvin; Kevin W Finkel; Charles E Wade; Lillian S Kao
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Effectiveness of trauma centers verification: Protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Brice Batomen; Lynne Moore; Mabel Carabali; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; Howard Champion; Arijit Nandi
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.