PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) and big bubble (BB) formation in a model of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). DESIGN: Ex-vivo. METHODS: Corneoscleral buttons from human donors were loaded onto an artificial anterior chamber connected to a column of balanced salt solution. A surgeon-in-training learned to perform DALK via the BB technique using swept-source microscope-integrated optical coherence tomography (SS-MIOCT) with heads-up display (HUD). DALK procedures were performed at 6 different IOPs (5, 10, 15, 20, 30, or 40 mm Hg; n = 6 per group) in a randomized fashion, with the surgeon-in-training masked to the pressure and guided by SS-MIOCT with HUD. For a subset of corneas within each pressure group, DALK was performed on matching donor tissue at a control IOP. BB diameter was recorded, and a diameter exceeding the trephine diameter was considered optimal. RESULTS: Wilcoxon rank sum test showed a difference in BB diameter among the different pressure groups (mean ± SD of 7.75 ± 1.60, 8.33 ± 1.99, 10.9 ± 0.92, 9.08 ± 1.07, 6.67 ± 3.33, and 3.42 ± 3.77 mm in the 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 mm Hg groups, respectively; P = 0.0014). Per Tukey test, this difference was attributable to comparisons between the 40 mm Hg group and the 5, 10, 15, or 20 mm Hg groups (P = 0.04, 0.02, 0.0001, 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this ex-vivo model of DALK, the BB technique guided by SS-MIOCT with HUD yielded bubbles of optimal diameters only at physiologic pressures (10‒20 mm Hg). Extremely high IOP (40 mm Hg) resulted in BBs of significantly smaller diameter than BBs obtained at physiologic and low (5 mm Hg) IOPs. Copyright 2017 Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) and big bubble (BB) formation in a model of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). DESIGN: Ex-vivo. METHODS: Corneoscleral buttons from human donors were loaded onto an artificial anterior chamber connected to a column of balanced salt solution. A surgeon-in-training learned to perform DALK via the BB technique using swept-source microscope-integrated optical coherence tomography (SS-MIOCT) with heads-up display (HUD). DALK procedures were performed at 6 different IOPs (5, 10, 15, 20, 30, or 40 mm Hg; n = 6 per group) in a randomized fashion, with the surgeon-in-training masked to the pressure and guided by SS-MIOCT with HUD. For a subset of corneas within each pressure group, DALK was performed on matching donor tissue at a control IOP. BB diameter was recorded, and a diameter exceeding the trephine diameter was considered optimal. RESULTS: Wilcoxon rank sum test showed a difference in BB diameter among the different pressure groups (mean ± SD of 7.75 ± 1.60, 8.33 ± 1.99, 10.9 ± 0.92, 9.08 ± 1.07, 6.67 ± 3.33, and 3.42 ± 3.77 mm in the 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 mm Hg groups, respectively; P = 0.0014). Per Tukey test, this difference was attributable to comparisons between the 40 mm Hg group and the 5, 10, 15, or 20 mm Hg groups (P = 0.04, 0.02, 0.0001, 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this ex-vivo model of DALK, the BB technique guided by SS-MIOCT with HUD yielded bubbles of optimal diameters only at physiologic pressures (10‒20 mm Hg). Extremely high IOP (40 mm Hg) resulted in BBs of significantly smaller diameter than BBs obtained at physiologic and low (5 mm Hg) IOPs. Copyright 2017 Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology.
Entities:
Keywords:
deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; intraocular pressure; optical coherence tomography
Authors: Irit Bahar; Igor Kaiserman; Sathish Srinivasan; Jin Ya-Ping; Allan R Slomovic; David S Rootman Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-08-23 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Neel D Pasricha; Christine Shieh; Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Brenton Keller; David Cunefare; Jodhbir S Mehta; Sina Farsiu; Joseph A Izatt; Cynthia A Toth; Anthony N Kuo Journal: Cornea Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Alan Sugar; Jean Paul Tanner; Mariya Dontchev; Brad Tennant; Robert L Schultze; Steven P Dunn; Thomas D Lindquist; Robin L Gal; Roy W Beck; Craig Kollman; Mark J Mannis; Edward J Holland Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-04-23 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: O M Carrasco-Zevallos; B Keller; C Viehland; L Shen; G Waterman; B Todorich; C Shieh; P Hahn; S Farsiu; A N Kuo; C A Toth; J A Izatt Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Philipp Steven; Carolin Le Blanc; Eva Lankenau; Marc Krug; Stefan Oelckers; Ludwig M Heindl; Uta Gehlsen; Gereon Huettmann; Claus Cursiefen Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Yuan Tian; Mark Draelos; Ryan P McNabb; Kris Hauser; Anthony N Kuo; Joseph A Izatt Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 3.562
Authors: Mark Draelos; Gao Tang; Brenton Keller; Anthony Kuo; Kris Hauser; Joseph A Izatt Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2019-11-20 Impact factor: 4.538