Literature DB >> 28930240

Anti-Bacterial Activity of Phenolic Compounds against Streptococcus pyogenes.

Sabrina Macé1, Lisbeth Truelstrup Hansen2, H P Vasantha Rupasinghe3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, Streptococcus pyogenes is the leading cause of bacterial pharyngitis. To reduce the use of antibiotics, antimicrobial phytochemical-containing remedies, which have long been in use in traditional medicine, may provide new approaches for management of streptococcal pharyngitis. The objective of this study was to assess the inhibitory activities of 25 natural phenolic compounds against three strains of S. pyogenes.
METHODS: After an initial screening, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the nine most effective phenolic compounds were determined. The effect of four compounds with the lowest MIC and MBC on streptococcal growth and biofilm formation was also studied.
RESULTS: 1,2-Naphthoquinone and 5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone elicited the greatest anti-S. pyogenes activities with MICs ranging from 0.39 to 6.25 µg mL-1 and MBCs of 100 µg mL-1. Both naphthoquinones inhibited the biofilm formation at concentrations ranging from 12.5 to 50 µg mL-1. Biofilm reduction and altered bacterial cell structures were visible in scanning electron microscopy images of naphthoquinone-treated cells.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, 1,2-naphthoquinone and 5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone inhibit S. pyogenes and should be further investigated as candidates for the management of streptococcal pharyngitis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biofilm; disease; infection; naphthoquinone; pharyngitis; polyphenols; strep throat

Year:  2017        PMID: 28930240      PMCID: PMC5590061          DOI: 10.3390/medicines4020025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicines (Basel)        ISSN: 2305-6320


1. Introduction

Pharyngitis or bacterial infection of the throat is a common disease, which is often caused by Streptococcus pyogenes [1,2]. Worldwide, S. pyogenes are responsible for an estimated 600 million cases of throat infections per year [3]. β-Lactams, such as penicillin, are the preferred antibiotics in the treatment of S. pyogenes throat infections, with macrolides being used for patients with β-lactam hypersensitivity. However, while resistance to β-lactams has so far not emerged in S. pyogenes, resistances were found for macrolides and some quinolones (fluoroquinolone) [3,4]. Moreover, S. pyogenes forms biofilm, which has been associated with antibiotic treatment failures [5]. Thus, there is an urgent need to find new potent antibacterial and anti-biofilm agents which could find use in alternative and/or complementary therapy for streptococcal pharyngitis. In addition to treatment with prescribed medications, throat lozenges containing chemical anesthetics and antiseptics are being used by patients in the relief of the discomfort associated with the infection. The antimicrobial quaternary ammonium compound, dequalinium chloride, is similarly used in the treatment of common infections of the mouth and throat and incorporated in candy-based lozenge formulations [6]. The antiseptic and local anesthetic hexylresorcinol has also been included as an active ingredient in throat lozenges [7]. Natural products derived from plants have been used in traditional medicine since the ancient times and are, now, being widely studied for incorporation into mainstream products. Plant-derived compounds of interest are mostly secondary metabolites, which possess antimicrobial properties against microbial pathogens and spoilers [8]. Recently, a diverse range of phytochemical antibacterial agents has been reported to suppress the growth of S. pyogenes, including polyphenols (i.e., flavonoids) and terpenes [9,10,11,12]. A recent review describes the mechanisms of inhibition of different Streptococcus species, including S. pyogenes, by phytochemicals through the prevention of the bacterial adherence of the pharynx, inhibition of glycolytic enzyme and pH drop, reduction of biofilm, and alteration of cell surface hydrophobicity [2]. The objective of the present study was to identify, among 25 different commercially available plant-derived phenolic compounds, the ones with anti-S. pyogenes activities, which could be incorporated in dehydrated honey throat lozenges and similar products.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

The experiments used the following human S. pyogenes strains: S. pyogenes ATCC ® 19615 ™, S. pyogenes ATCC ® 49399 ™ and a clinical isolate obtained from a patient with pharyngitis (Bacteriology, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Halifax, NS, Canada). The strains were routinely cultured in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) (Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) media at 37 °C under aerobic conditions.

2.2. Compounds

Twenty-five phenolic compounds belonging to 12 different classes: three simple phenols (eugenol, thymol, and pyrocatechol), three isoflavones (daidzin, daidzein, and genistein), one chalcone (phloretin), one chalcone glycoside (phlorizin), two flavan-3-ols (epicatechin and epigallocatechin gallate, EGCG), two flavanones (naringenin and hesperidin), two flavones (flavone and naringin), two flavonols (myricetin and quercetin hydrate), one flavonol glucoside (quercetin-3-O-glucoside), one hydroxybenzoates (gallic acid), three hydroxycinnamates (tran-ferulic acid, cinnamaldehyde, and warfarin), two naphthoquinones (1,2-naphthoquinone and 5-hydro-1,4-naphthoquinone), one stilbene (resveratrol), one tannin (tannic acid), and two chemical compounds (used as positive controls), one quaternary ammonium compound (dequalinium chloride), and one substituted phenol (4-hexylresorcinol) were evaluated for their antibacterial properties. The compounds were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Company (Saint-Louis, MO, USA). Before each experiment, the stock solutions were freshly made to a concentration of 10 mg mL−1 in 100% DMSO.

2.3. Preliminary Screening Using the Micro-Dilution Broth Antibacterial Assay

The inhibitory effect of the phenolic compounds (100 µg mL−1) was initially assessed on S. pyogenes ATCC 19615 and ATCC 49399, using the broth micro-dilution assay as described by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [13]. Briefly, in a 96-well micro-plate, 2 µL of the 100 mg mL−1 stock solution was added to 98 µL of BHI broth in order to reach a final test compound concentration of 100 µg mL−1. Finally, for each strain, 100 µL of standardized inoculum was added, resulting in an initial bacterial concentration of 5 log10 (CFU mL−1). Bacterial inocula in BHI broth (2 µL water) and BHI broth +1% DMSO were also run as a control. The growth of the bacteria was assessed after incubation for 24 h at 37 °C by reading the A600 nm using a plate reader (Epoch TM, Biotek, Winooski, VT, USA). Each test was done in triplicate. In order to determine the most active compounds, a decrease in the A600 nm of 0.1 or more in the presence of the tested compounds in comparison to the control (bacteria inocula in BHI +1% DMSO) was considered to be indicative of an inhibition of the growth.

2.4. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC)

MIC broth micro-dilution assay was performed as described in the previous section, except 2-fold dilutions were used to yield final test compound concentrations ranging from 0.19 to 100 µg mL−1, on the three S. pyogenes strains. The MIC was determined as the first concentration where the decrease of A600 nm was significant (p < 0.05) in comparison with the control. To determine MBC, 30 µL from each well, where no growth was detected—i.e., compound concentration ≥MIC—was spread on BHI agar plates and incubated for 24–48 h at 37 °C. The lowest compound concentration resulting in no growth on the agar plate represented the MBC. Each sample was tested in triplicate and each experiment was repeated three times.

2.5. Time-Kill Assay

The effect of concentrations ranging from 1 to 16 times MIC of the four most active compounds on the growth of S. pyogenes ATCC 19615 was quantified after 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 h at 37 °C. At each time point, an aliquot (100 μL) was pipetted, serially diluted, and plated on BHI agar followed by enumeration and calculation of the mean log10 CFU mL−1 of the duplicate samples. Each time-kill experiment was repeated in three biologically independent assays (n = 6).

2.6. Inhibition of Biofilm Formation

The ability of S. pyogenes to form biofilm in the presence of 1,2-naphthoquinone, 5-hydroxy-1-naphthoquinone, dequalinium chloride, or 4-hexylresorcinol (0.19–100 µg mL−1) was assessed by measuring the metabolic activity of sessile biofilm cells using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) dye assay. After an exposure period of three days at 37 °C, the planktonic bacterial cells were eliminated by carefully removing the BHI medium from the wells. Adapted MTT assay was performed as described in Vybrant® MTT Cell Proliferation Assay Kit Protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After incubation for 10 min at 37 °C, the A540 nm was measured and used to calculate the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC), defined as the first concentration where the decrease in A540 nm was significant (p < 0.05) in comparison with the control.

2.7. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

S. pyogenes ATCC 19615 biofilms formed (72 h at 37 °C) in the presence of MBIC concentrations of 1,2 naphthoquinone, 5-hydroxy 1,4 naphthoquinone, dequalinium chloride, 4-hexylresorcinol were prepared in microplates. The S. pyogenes biofilms were also grown in BHI broth (water) and BHI broth +1% DMSO as controls. After incubation, a sample fixation method for SEM [14] adapted for microplate was performed. After discarding the last solution, the plate was air dried for 2 h in a fume-hood. The bottom of the wells (location of the biofilms) were then removed with a heated blade and mounted on aluminum mounts using the carbon adhesive and finally sputter-coated with gold and examined using a Hitachi S-4700 SEM (Tokyo, Japan).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

During the determination of the MIC and MBIC, statistically significant differences (Student t-test (paired, two tailed), p < 0.05) between test compound concentrations and controls were determined using the Student t-test on the A600 nm or A540 nm data, respectively.

3. Results

The results of the screening test against two S. pyogenes strains, ATCC 19615 and ATCC 49399 showed that nine compounds exhibited antibacterial activity against at least one strain at the concentration of 100 µg mL−1. Six of them, phlorizin, naringenin, myrcetin 1,2-naphthoquinone, 5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone, and resveratrol inhibited both strains like the two positive controls. Flavone and thymol affected the growth of strain ATCC 19615 while cinnamaldehyde inhibited only ATCC 49399. The MIC of those nine phytochemicals (Table 1) varied from 0.39 µg mL−1 to >100 µg mL−1 and the MBC from 100 µg mL−1 to >100 µg mL−1 with some sensitivity/resistance variations among strains. 1,2-Naphthoquinone and 5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone exhibited the best inhibitory effect with similar MIC values relative to the positive controls and were selected for further analysis of their effect on bacterial growth and biofilm formation.
Table 1

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, µg mL−1), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC, µg mL−1) of 11 compounds and minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC, µg mL−1) of the four most active compounds against three different strains of S. pyogenes.

Streptococcus Pyogenes Strains CompoundsChemical StructureATCC 19615ATCC 49399A Clinical Isolate
MICMBCMBICMICMBCMBICMICMBCMBIC
Phlorizin100>100 and100>100nd100>100nd
Naringenin50>100nd50>100nd50>100nd
Flavone50>100nd>100>100nd25>100nd
Myricetin50>100nd100>100nd100>100nd
Thymol25>100nd>100>100nd≥100>100nd
1,2-Naphthoquinone3.125100256.25100506.2510050
5-Hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone1.5610012.51.56>100500.3910012.5
Resveratrol100>100nd50>100nd>100>100nd
Cinnamaldehyde>100>100nd50>100nd25>100nd
Dequalinium chloride0.3912.50.780.78250.780.7812.50.39
4-Hexylresorcinol1.5650256.255012.512.55012.5

a MBC was higher than the maximum concentration of 100 µg mL−1 used in this study; nd: not-determined.

The four compounds that higher concentrations increased the lag phase and the bacterial log10-reduction (Figure 1). The presence of low concentrations (<12.5 µg mL−1) of 1,2-naphthoquinone delayed growth during the first 10 h but after 24 h the bacterial concentration reached around 8 log10 CFU mL−1 (Figure 1A). A concentration of 25 µg mL−1 displayed a bacteriostatic effect for the first 10 h, after which growth resumed to reach 5 log10 CFU mL−1 after 24 h. At 50 µg mL−1, the growth was inhibited and a bacterial log10-reduction of more than 3.5 log10 CFU mL−1 observed after 24 h.
Figure 1

The effect of several concentrations of the four compounds on the growth of S. pyogenes ATCC 19615 at 37 °C: (A) 1,2-naphthoquinone (MIC: 3.125 µg mL−1); (B) 5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (MIC: 1.56 µg mL−1); (C) dequalinium chloride (MIC: 0.39 µg mL−1); and (D) 4-hexylresorcinol (MIC: 1.56 µg mL−1). Arrows indicate that plate count values were below the detection threshold of 1.22 log10 CFU mL−1.

Administration of 1.56 µg mL−1 5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone caused populations to remain under 6 log10 CFU mL−1 for 10 h; however, after 24 h more than 7 log10 CFU mL−1 was reached (Figure 1B). A bacteriostatic effect was similarly observed with 3.125 µg mL−1 5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone where bacterial counts were under 6 log10 CFU mL−1 after 24 h. Using concentrations of 6.25 and 12.5 µg mL−1, numbers stayed around 4–5 log10 CFU mL−1 for 10 h and then dropped about 2 log10 CFU mL−1. With 25 µg mL−1, the bacterial concentrations underwent a 2 log10-reduction after 10 h and reached the limit of detection (>1.22 log10 CFU mL−1) after 24 h. For the dequalinium chloride (Figure 1C), the same trend of inhibition was observed where the lowest test concentrations of 0.39 µg mL−1 permitted growth and a twice-higher concentration of 0.78 µg mL−1 displayed a bacteriostatic effect. After 24 h, the concentrations of 1.56 and 3.125 µg mL−1 induced more than 2.5 log10 CFU mL−1 and 6.25 µg mL−1 caused a >4 log10-reduction (below the detection limit). The concentrations of 4-hexylresorcinol ranging from 1.56 to 6.25 µg mL−1 caused a growth delay and a small log10-reduction (under 1 log10 CFU mL−1) after 24 h. However, the concentration of 25 µg mL−1 induced a log10-reduction of more than 3 log10 CFU mL−1 after 24 h (Figure 1D). The two naphthoquinones as well as the substituted phenol, 4-hexylresorcinol, inhibited biofilm formation with MBICs of between 25–50 µg mL−1 for 1,2-naphthoquinone, 12.5–50 µg mL−1 for 5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone, and from 12.5 to 25 µg mL−1 for 4-hexylresorcinol (Table 1). Dequalinium chloride displayed the lowest MBIC ranging from 0.39–0.78 µg mL−1. The sensitivity to the inhibition of biofilm formation varied among the strains and depended on the compounds. ATCC 19615 was more sensitive to 1,2-naphthoquinone but more resistant to 4-hexylresorcinol than the two other strains (Table 1). SEM images showed the visual reduction of S. pyogenes ATCC 19615 biofilm in the presence of the MBIC of the four compounds by strongly reducing the concentration of the attached cells and modifying their shape (Figure 2). The presence of 1% DMSO in BHI (Figure 2B) reduced the chain length of the cocci and biofilm density, and also appeared to shrink the cells slightly in comparison to BHI only treatment (Figure 2A). Figure 2C shows that 25 µg mL−1 of 1,2-naphthoquinone reduced strongly the concentration of the attached cells, leaving only a few long and thin chains comprised of shrunken, irregular cells. In the presence of 12.5 µg mL−1 of 5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (Figure 2D), smaller cells aggregated in clusters of chains. Figure 2E presents the effect of dequalinium chloride at 0.78 µg mL−1, which induced the formation of very small groups of bacterial cells and completely altered their shape. The MBIC of 4-hexylresorcinol (Figure 2F) affected the chain formation of the bacteria and only a few small chains containing 2–4 cells were observed.
Figure 2

Scanning electron microscopy images of the effect of MBIC concentrations of the compounds on the biofilm formation by strain S. pyogenes ATCC 19615 at 37 °C: S. pyogenes in BHI (A) and with 1% DMSO (B); S. pyogenes with 25 µg mL−1 of 1,2 naphthoquinone (C); 12.5 µg mL−1 of 5-hydroxy-1,4 naphthoquinone (D); 0.78 µg mL−1 of dequalinium chloride (E) and 25 µg mL−1 of 4-hexylresorcinol (F). Magnification value: I, ×1000; II, ×5000; III, ×1000; IV, ×15,000; V, ×25,000.

4. Discussion

According to the literature, the MICs of phenolic compounds against pharyngitis pathogens range from 1.52 to 100 µg mL−1 [9,10,11,12]. Among all the phenolic compounds tested in this study, nine compounds showed an anti-Streptococcal activity at a concentration lower than 100 µg mL−1. Gyawali and Ibrahim. (2014) [8] stated that the hydroxyl (-OH) group in phenolic compounds may cause bacterial inhibition and described the importance of double bonds (number and position) in relation to antimicrobial effectiveness. Inferences could be made to the present study as, among the nine active compounds, the most anti-S. pyogenes naphthoquinones possess two carbonyl groups in an aromatic ring as part of their quinone structure. This hypothesis is supported by a recent review which associated the oxydo-reduction activity of the quinone structure in 2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone with the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and damage of macromolecules such as DNA, proteins, and lipids [15]. Ndi et al. (2007) [11] isolated another naphthoquinone from Eremophila serrula, which also exhibited antagonism against S. pyogenes strain ATCC 10389 with low MIC (7.8 µg mL−1) and MBC (15.6 µg mL−1). Clinically, most antibacterials are described as potentially being both bactericidal and bacteriostatic. This was also observed in this study as the tested compounds. Even if a bactericidal action is preferred in the context of treatment, achieving a bacteriostatic effect may advantageously inhibit exotoxin production in Staphylococci and Streptococci thereby avoiding induction of the toxic shock syndrome [16]. In comparison with the kinetics of the tested compounds, rhodomyrtone—the potent bioactive compound from Rhodomyrtus tomentosa—appears to be slightly more effective: it exerted a faster bactericidal activity on S. pyogenes (within 5 and 6 h) at lower concentrations (6.5–12.5 µg mL−1) [17]. However, rhodomyrtone (Sigma-Aldrich Co., Saint-Louis, MO, USA) is about 2000–4500 times more expensive than the naphthoquinones tested. To the best of our knowledge, the anti-biofilm potential of naphthoquinones against S. pyogenes has not been explored. The inhibition of biofilm formation is an interesting way to prevent the formation of well-organized attached bacterial biofilms and, thus, pharyngitis. We observed that the naphthoquinones elicited significant anti-biofilm activity against S. pyogenes, with metabolic MBICs in the same range as 4-hexylresorcinol and this was confirmed by SEM, where S. pyogenes ATCC 19,615 cells appeared less aggregated, showed morphological changes, and reduced biofilm formation. These observations are in accordance with the potential of phenolic compounds to damage the membrane structure as well as anti-S. pyogenes properties of phytochemicals such as anti-adhesion, anti-biofilm, and quorum-sensing inhibition [2,8]. The generation of ROS during the bio-reduction of naphthoquinones [15] might be linked to the loss of cell wall integrity observed. In addition, the visible effect of 1% DMSO on the bacteria, which do not appear on the growth (Figure 1), could also slightly enhance the antibacterial effect of the phytochemicals. Considering the potential clinical application of our study, additional experiments could be conducted on combination of natural antibacterial agents and currently used antibiotics to enhance the present management practices against S. pyogenes. If the combination demonstrates a synergic and/or a complementary effect (e.g., anti-inflammatory and antitussive), it could become a combined treatment for patient’s pain relief. Moreover, it is also possible to incorporate the efficacious natural compounds in dehydrated honey lozenges. Honey itself has a recognized effect as being systemic antitussive and antimicrobial natural source [18,19,20]. Interestingly, a recent study reported that honey with a high phenolic content presented the highest antimicrobial activity [20]. Further investigations are required to affirm the synergic effect with honey but also understand the safety of the use of naphthoquinones in throat lozenges before making any recommendations for their use for managing streptococcal pharyngitis.
  15 in total

1.  Antibacterial activity of various honey types of Algeria against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes.

Authors:  Ahmed Moussa; Djebli Noureddine; Hammoudi Si Mohamed; Meslem Abdelmelek; Aissat Saad
Journal:  Asian Pac J Trop Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.226

2.  Antimicrobial activity of Schinus lentiscifolius (Anacardiaceae).

Authors:  Ilaine T S Gehrke; Alexandre T Neto; Marcelo Pedroso; Clarice P Mostardeiro; Ivana B M Da Cruz; Ubiratan F Silva; Vinicius Ilha; Ionara I Dalcol; Ademir F Morel
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.360

3.  Antibacterial serrulatane diterpenes from the Australian native plant Eremophila microtheca.

Authors:  Emma C Barnes; Angela M Kavanagh; Soumya Ramu; Mark A Blaskovich; Matthew A Cooper; Rohan A Davis
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.072

Review 4.  Clinical relevance of bacteriostatic versus bactericidal mechanisms of action in the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections.

Authors:  G A Pankey; L D Sabath
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Effect of multiple honey doses on non-specific acute cough in children. An open randomised study and literature review.

Authors:  S Miceli Sopo; M Greco; S Monaco; G Varrasi; G Di Lorenzo; G Simeone
Journal:  Allergol Immunopathol (Madr)       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 1.667

Review 6.  Population biology of the human restricted pathogen, Streptococcus pyogenes.

Authors:  Debra E Bessen
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 3.342

7.  Antimicrobial compounds from Eremophila serrulata.

Authors:  Chi P Ndi; Susan J Semple; Hans J Griesser; Simon M Pyke; Mary D Barton
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 4.072

8.  Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a single dose of an amylmetacresol/2,4-dichlorobenzyl alcohol plus lidocaine lozenge or a hexylresorcinol lozenge for the treatment of acute sore throat due to upper respiratory tract infection.

Authors:  Damien McNally; Adrian Shephard; Emma Field
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.327

Review 9.  Molecular Mechanisms of Inhibition of Streptococcus Species by Phytochemicals.

Authors:  Soheila Abachi; Song Lee; H P Vasantha Rupasinghe
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Pharyngitis and epiglottitis.

Authors:  Maria L Alcaide; Alan L Bisno
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.982

View more
  7 in total

1.  The effect of fluoroquinolones and antioxidans on biofilm formation by Proteus mirabilis strains.

Authors:  Jana Przekwas; Jakub Gębalski; Joanna Kwiecińska-Piróg; Natalia Wiktorczyk-Kapischke; Ewa Wałecka-Zacharska; Eugenia Gospodarek-Komkowska; Dorota Rutkowska; Krzysztof Skowron
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 6.781

2.  Herbal Tea for the Management of Pharyngitis: Inhibition of Streptococcus pyogenes Growth and Biofilm Formation by Herbal Infusions.

Authors:  Niluni M Wijesundara; H P Vasantha Rupasinghe
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2019-08-24

3.  Impact of Citral and Phloretin, Alone and in Combination, on Major Virulence Traits of Streptococcus pyogenes.

Authors:  Mohd Adil; Mohd Hassan Baig; H P Vasantha Rupasinghe
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Promising bactericidal approach of dihydrazone analogues against bio-film forming Gram-negative bacteria and molecular mechanistic studies.

Authors:  K P Rakesh; H K Vivek; H M Manukumar; C S Shantharam; S N A Bukhari; Hua-Li Qin; M B Sridhara
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 5.  Application of bacteriocins in food preservation and infectious disease treatment for humans and livestock: a review.

Authors:  Zhang Jin Ng; Mazni Abu Zarin; Chee Keong Lee; Joo Shun Tan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Antibacterial and anti-trichomunas characteristics of local landraces of Lawsonia inermis L.

Authors:  M Fatahi Bafghi; S Salary; F Mirzaei; H Mahmoodian; H Meftahizade; R Zareshahi
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2022-07-30

7.  Psychobiotic Potential of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid-Producing Marine Enterococcus faecium SH9 from Marine Shrimp.

Authors:  Shimaa El Sakkaa; Eman H Zaghloul; Khaled M Ghanem
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 5.265

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.