| Literature DB >> 28930133 |
Weiguo Lao1, Xingliang Jin2, Yi Tan3, Linda Xiao4, Matthew P Padula5,6, David P Bishop7, Brian Reedy8, Madeleine Ong9, Mohammad A Kamal10, Xianqin Qu11.
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis is a condition in which the bones become brittle, increasing the risk of fractures. Complementary medicines have traditionally used animal bones for managing bone disorders, such as osteoporosis. This study aimed to discover new natural products for these types of conditions by determining mineral and protein content of bone extracts derived from the Australian wallaby.Entities:
Keywords: bone remodelling proteins; mineral components; osteoporosis; protein components; wallaby bone
Year: 2016 PMID: 28930133 PMCID: PMC5456248 DOI: 10.3390/medicines3030023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicines (Basel) ISSN: 2305-6320
Figure 1The flow chart of sequential protein extractions method for wallaby bone.
Quantity of major components in wallaby bones.
| Bone Samples | Water (%) | Ca (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Femur | 54.44 ± 4.09 | 22.72 ± 8.14 | 12.36 ± 4.46 |
| Fibula | 34.05 ± 5.90 | 27.54 ± 1.46 | 16.47 ± 6.24 |
| Tibia | 35.23 ± 6.34 | 27.33 ± 3.16 | 14.92 ± 1.16 |
| Average | 41.24 ± 11.45 | 26.21 ± 6.87 | 14.72 ± 4.64 |
Results show different bone parts (femur, fibula and tibia) derived from three individual wallaby samples (n = 3).
Quantity of medium level minerals in wallaby bones.
| Bone Samples | Na | Mg | Al | Fe | Sr | Ba |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | |
| Femur | 5.48 × 104 ± 0.53 | 0.99 × 103 ± 0.03 | 238.77 ± 22.99 | 135.04 ± 3.08 | 495.00 ± 15.71 | 89.16 ± 13.54 |
| Fibula | 5.16 × 104 ± 0.24 | 0.78 × 103 ± 0.14 | 292.71 ± 13.37 | 166.64 ± 1.38 | 611.83 ± 23.96 | 92.96 ± 14.00 |
| Tibia | 4.40 × 104 ± 0.81 | 0.83 × 103 ± 0.05 | 261.84 ± 14.85 | 153.08 ± 4.00 | 570.75 ± 11.59 | 84.62 ± 9.10 |
| Average | 5.01 × 104 ± 1.55 | 0.87 × 103 ± 0.21 | 264.44 ± 27.06 | 151.59 ± 15.85 | 559.19 ± 59.26 | 88.91 ± 4.18 |
Results show different bone parts (femur, fibula and tibia) derived from three individual wallaby samples (n = 3).
Quantity of heavy metals and micro minerals in wallaby bones.
| Bone Samples | Pb | Ni | Mn | Cu | Cr | Se | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | |
| Femur | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 3.97 ± 0.86 | 1.31 ± 0.21 | 1.11 ± 0.33 | 1.08 ± 0.19 | 0.71 ± 0.03 | 71.65 ± 5.52 |
| Fibula | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 1.36 ± 0.45 | 2.82 ± 0.36 | 1.84 ± 1.13 | 1.30 ± 0.25 | 0.76 ± 0.04 | 81.74 ± 6.46 |
| Tibia | 0.16 ± 0.08 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 1.31 ± 0.24 | 1.12 ± 0.90 | 0.09 ± 0.05 | 0.69 ± 0.05 | 77.44 ± 8.27 |
| Average | 0.24 ± 0.15 | 1.79 ± 1.99 | 2.11 ± 0.76 | 1.36 ± 0.42 | 0.82 ± 0.64 | 0.72 ± 0.12 | 76.94 ± 5.06 |
Results show different bone parts (femur, fibula and tibia) derived from three individual wallaby samples (n = 3).
Figure 2The FTIR spectrum of wallaby bone shows bands originating from protein (mostly amide C=O groups: these include the amide I band at about 1653 cm−1, the amide II band at about 1540 cm−1 and the amide III band about 1238 cm−1) and lipids (e.g., C–H vibrations at about 2923, 2852 and 1744 cm−1).
Total protein content of protein extracts (mg/g of bone) from different types of bone.
| Bone Protein Extracts | Femur (mg/g) | Tibia (mg/g) | Fibula (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extract 1 | 0.709 ± 0.07 | 0.611 ± 0.08 | 0.236± 0.03 |
| Extract 2 | 0.922 ± 0.04 | 0.718 ± 0.04 | 0.305 ± 0.02 |
| Extract 3 | 0.152 ± 0.02 | 0.092 ± 0.02 | 0.008 ± 0.05 |
| Extract 4 | 0.70 ± 0.04 | 0.787 ± 0.05 | 0.613 ± 0.01 |
| Total | 2.48 ± 0.1.36 | 2.21 ± 0.11 | 1.23 ± 0.13 |
Quantity of protein extracted, number of peptides and proteins identified.
| Wallaby Bone Protein Extracts | Number of Unique Spectra | Number of Unique Peptides | Number of Unique Proteins | Number of Clusters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extract 1 | 334 | 293 | 117 | 74 |
| Extract 2 | 362 | 311 | 119 | 72 |
| Extract 3 | 409 | 362 | 127 | 79 |
| Extract 4 | 481 | 417 | 137 | 85 |
The quantity of protein extracted, number of peptides and proteins identified from the four protein extracts were identified using the sequential extraction protocol by auto-searching with Scaffold software.
Figure 3Venn-diagram showing the number of unique proteins that overlap in the four wallaby bone protein extracts, as listed from Table 5.
Figure 4Percentage classification into biological process categories for proteins from the four extraction groups, using Gene Ontology Terms. All results were from the Intelligent Data Acquisition analysis and acquired by manual inspection with Scaffold software.
Figure 5Percentage classification into cellular components for proteins from the four extraction groups, using Gene Ontology Terms. All results were from the Intelligent Data Acquisition analysis and acquired by manual inspection with Scaffold software.
Figure 6Percentage classification according to molecular function for proteins from the four extraction groups, using Gene Ontology Terms. All results were from the Intelligent Data Acquisition analysis and acquired by manual inspection with Scaffold software.
Figure 7Calcium content (A) and ALP activity (B) in osteogenic cells derived from adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs) with wallaby bone extracts (WBE) treatments (1, 5 and 10 µg/mL). Data from three separate experiments, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 vs. control.
Average of major component in wallaby bones compared with the bones of domestic animals.
| Bone Samples | Water (%) | Ca (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wallaby bone | 41.24 | 26.21 | 14.72 |
| Alpaca Bone | 41 | 20 | 8.8 |
| Beef Bone | 64.2 | 5.1 | 2 |
| Pork Bone | 66.7 | 4.5 | 2.2 |
| Lamb Bone | 65.1 | 3.4 | 1.6 |
| Chicken Bone | 65.6 | 1 | 0.5 |