OBJECTIVE: The findings of previous research that examined relationships between popularity and alcohol use in adolescents have been mixed, and few hypotheses have proposed mechanisms for this relationship. The current study expands on previous literature (a) by examining a possible mechanism that can explain the relation between popularity and alcohol use (home access to alcohol) and (b) by using another sociometric measure ("betweenness"), beyond popularity, that may relate more to home alcohol access. METHOD: Using network-level data from adolescents in 9th-11th grades in eight schools within two in-home waves of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), we examined two sociometric measures of social status: popularity (number of schoolmates who nominated participants as a friend) and betweenness (level of ties participants have to multiple social subgroups within a network). RESULTS: Betweenness, but not popularity, related to later alcohol use. Having home access to alcohol positively related to later alcohol use, and having friends with home access to alcohol negatively related to later alcohol use. Alcohol access was also related to later sociometric status. Friends' alcohol access negatively related to later betweenness, and personal alcohol access moderated other pathways predicting betweenness. CONCLUSIONS: Betweenness appears to play a unique role in the association between social status and alcohol use in adolescent social networks. This is potentially tied to specific ways in which adolescents may be able to access alcohol (through home or through friends with access at home). More research is necessary to examine the ways in which multiple sociometric statuses relate to the contexts in which adolescents access and use alcohol.
OBJECTIVE: The findings of previous research that examined relationships between popularity and alcohol use in adolescents have been mixed, and few hypotheses have proposed mechanisms for this relationship. The current study expands on previous literature (a) by examining a possible mechanism that can explain the relation between popularity and alcohol use (home access to alcohol) and (b) by using another sociometric measure ("betweenness"), beyond popularity, that may relate more to home alcohol access. METHOD: Using network-level data from adolescents in 9th-11th grades in eight schools within two in-home waves of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), we examined two sociometric measures of social status: popularity (number of schoolmates who nominated participants as a friend) and betweenness (level of ties participants have to multiple social subgroups within a network). RESULTS: Betweenness, but not popularity, related to later alcohol use. Having home access to alcohol positively related to later alcohol use, and having friends with home access to alcohol negatively related to later alcohol use. Alcohol access was also related to later sociometric status. Friends' alcohol access negatively related to later betweenness, and personal alcohol access moderated other pathways predicting betweenness. CONCLUSIONS: Betweenness appears to play a unique role in the association between social status and alcohol use in adolescent social networks. This is potentially tied to specific ways in which adolescents may be able to access alcohol (through home or through friends with access at home). More research is necessary to examine the ways in which multiple sociometric statuses relate to the contexts in which adolescents access and use alcohol.
Authors: Mary O Hearst; Jayne A Fulkerson; Mildred M Maldonado-Molina; Cheryl L Perry; Kelli A Komro Journal: Prev Med Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Hanneke A Teunissen; Renske Spijkerman; Mitchell J Prinstein; Geoffrey L Cohen; Rutger C M E Engels; Ron H J Scholte Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Joan S Tucker; Jeremy N V Miles; Elizabeth J D'Amico; Annie J Zhou; Harold D Green; Regina A Shih Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Christopher N Morrison; Hilary F Byrnes; Brenda A Miller; Sarah E Wiehe; William R Ponicki; Douglas J Wiebe Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 4.492