Literature DB >> 28930004

Enteric Infections Circulating during Hajj Seasons, 2011-2013.

Moataz Abd El Ghany, Mona Alsomali, Malak Almasri, Eriko Padron Regalado, Raeece Naeem, AbdulHafeez Tukestani, Abdullah Asiri, Grant A Hill-Cawthorne, Arnab Pain, Ziad A Memish.   

Abstract

Hajj, the annual Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca, Saudi Arabia, is a unique mass gathering event that raises public health concerns in the host country and globally. Although gastroenteritis and diarrhea are common among Hajj pilgrims, the microbial etiologies of these infections are unknown. We collected 544 fecal samples from pilgrims with medically attended diarrheal illness from 40 countries during the 2011-2013 Hajj seasons and screened the samples for 16 pathogens commonly associated with diarrheal infections. Bacteria were the main agents detected, in 82.9% of the 228 positive samples, followed by viral (6.1%) and parasitic (5.3%) agents. Salmonella spp., Shigella/enteroinvasive Escherichia coli, and enterotoxigenic E. coli were the main pathogens associated with severe symptoms. We identified genes associated with resistance to third-generation cephalosporins ≈40% of Salmonella- and E. coli-positive samples. Hajj-associated foodborne infections pose a major public health risk through the emergence and transmission of antimicrobial drug-resistant bacteria.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hajj; Saudi Arabia; antimicrobial resistance; bacteria; diarrhea; enteric infections; mass gathering; viruses

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28930004      PMCID: PMC5621540          DOI: 10.3201/eid2310.161642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Hajj, the annual pilgrimage by Muslims to Mecca, Saudi Arabia, is a unique mass gathering event in terms of scale (i.e., the number of pilgrims), diversity of the pilgrims, nature of the activities performed, and regularity. Approximately 2 million pilgrims from 185 countries, in addition to hundreds of thousands of residents of Saudi Arabia, travel to holy sites in Mecca each year (). This enormously diverse population (in terms of ethnic origin, socioeconomic status, sex, age, and health status) comes together to perform the same activities within a relatively short period over a limited area of land (), which allows for the mixing of infectious agents and susceptible populations (). Mass gatherings such as Hajj therefore increase the potential for the emergence and dissemination of infections and raises public health concerns in Saudi Arabia and globally (). Hajj-associated communicable public health hazards mainly involve the transmission of respiratory infections, foodborne diseases, bloodborne diseases, and zoonotic infections (). Globally, diarrheal infections remain the leading cause of mortality in children <5 years of age and contribute to ≈10% of child deaths each year (–). In addition, traveler’s diarrhea is still the most common illness observed in travelers returning from regions where diarrheal diseases are endemic (,). The main etiologic agents detected are consistently bacteria (Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., and Campylobacter spp.); viruses (rotavirus, norovirus, and adenovirus); and parasites (Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia lamblia, and Entamoeba histolytica) (,). Despite substantial advances in food and water hygiene in many countries, mass gathering events still represent the perfect environments for the transmission of enteric infections (,). Diarrheal infections and foodborne diseases are commonly associated with the Hajj pilgrimage (). Although diarrheal infections and other enteric infections are one of the most common complaints among pilgrims, little information is available regarding incidence, etiologic agents, and the abundance of antimicrobial drug–resistant strains. Published reports have mainly been based on analyses of hospital admission data that lack full characterization of the nature of the infections (–). Moreover, estimates of the incidence of Hajj-associated gastrointestinal disease based on hospital admission data can vary considerably (). Recently, a few studies have shown an increase in the carriage rates of enteric pathogens that include Tropheryma whipplei (), multidrug-resistant nontyphoidal Salmonella (), and carbapenemase-producing E. coli () among pilgrims from France returning from Hajj. These findings, coupled with the growing threat of drug-resistant microorganisms (), increase the risks associated with the Hajj pilgrimage and fuels the emergence and dissemination of drug-resistant enteric pathogens. We conducted a large-scale study to catalog the circulating enteric pathogen population in Hajj pilgrims with diarrheal symptoms. We report on the use of molecular and antigenic approaches to characterize the etiologic agents associated with enteric infections in pilgrims who sought medical treatment while performing Hajj during the 2011–2013 seasons.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

The samples were originally collected for diagnostic purposes; therefore, collection was not experimental in nature. The Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia anonymized all identifiable information, and only deidentified records and samples were available to the researchers. The King Fahad Medical City Institutional review board approved the study protocol (approval no. 11–157, dated October 4, 2011). The Institutional Biosafety and Ethics Committee of King Abdullah University of Science and Technology also approved the study in 2013.

Study Design

We conducted the study for 3 successive Hajj seasons, starting in 2011. Fecal samples from pilgrims having medically attended diarrhea while performing Hajj were collected. Healthcare facilities distributed along the Hajj sites were enrolled in the study. We included patients with symptoms who were seeking medical care for diarrhea or who were admitted to hospitals or primary care centers established in the holy sites during the 7–10 day Hajj period. We defined diarrhea as the occurrence of >3 unformed stools in a 24-hour period or passing stool more frequently than normal for the patient, accompanied with >1 other gastrointestinal symptom (abdominal pain/cramps, vomiting, or bloody or mucoid stools). Patients who had unformed stool with visible blood were defined as having cases of dysentery. Patients with increased body temperature were categorized as having either mild (>37.5°C and <39°C) or severe (>39°C) fever. We categorized the patients into 2 groups according to degree of symptom severity. We defined severe diarrhea as >6 unformed stools per day; diarrhea requiring hospitalization; or diarrhea accompanied by fever, dehydration, or bloody or mucoid stools. We classified patients with diarrhea not fulfilling the criteria for severe symptoms as having mild cases. We screened all the samples molecularly, antigenically, or both for a panel of 16 infectious agents commonly associated with diarrheal infection.

Antigenic Detection of Viral and Parasitic Pathogens

We used qualitative enzyme immunoassays for the initial detection of viral agents in the fecal samples according to manufacturers’ instructions. We used the IDEIA Norovirus test (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) to detect norovirus genogroups 1 and 2 and ProSpecT tests (Oxoid) to detect of group A rotaviruses, adenoviruses, and astroviruses. For parasitic agents, we used the Giardia/Cryptosporidium Quik Chek test (TechLab, Blacksburg VA, USA) for the detection and differentiation of Cryptosporidium oocyst antigen and Giardia cyst antigen.

Isolation of DNA Using QIAsymphony Platform

We used the QIAsymphony SP (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), an automated high-throughput platform, for the isolation and purification of total DNA from the collected fecal samples. We used the QIAsymphony DNA 800 complex kit (QIAGEN) to extract DNA from 800 μL of pretreated diluted samples according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Molecular Characterization of Bacterial Species

We used 3 previously established multiplex PCR assays (M1, 2, and 3) in parallel to detect the bacterial pathogens commonly associated with diarrheal infections (). The M1 multiplex PCR used primers targeting genes eae and bfpA (enteropathogenic E. coli), aggR (enteroaggregative E. coli) and Vero cytotoxin (enterohemorrhagic E. coli). The M2 multiplex PCR used primers targeting the genes elt and st (enterotoxigenic E. coli [ETEC]), daaE (diffusely adherent E. coli), and virF and ipaH (Shigella spp./enteroinvasive E. coli [EIEC]). The M3 multiplex PCR used primers targeting the hipO gene (Campylobacter jejuni), internal transcribed spacer region (Salmonella spp.), Yersinia stable toxin gene (Yersinia enterocolitica) and rtxA gene (Vibrio cholerae). Primer details and the expected PCR fragment sizes are provided (Technical Appendix Table 1). In summary, we mixed 200–400 ng of the extracted total DNA, 1–10 μmol/L of each of the primer pairs, and GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in a PCR total reaction volume of 25 μL to amplify the target genes. We ran PCR products on a 1.5% agarose electrophoresis gel at 120 volts for 2 hours and identified fragment sizes against positive controls by using the GelPilot 1kb Plus ladder (QIAGEN).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of persons who acquired enteric infections during their travel for Hajj, 2011–2013

CharacteristicYear
TotalStatistical analyses*
201120122013χ2p value
No. patients118297129544  
Median patient age, y (quartile deviation)40 (+12.25)40 (+13.25)40.5 (+14.0)40.17 (+13.17)  
No. countries of origin represented
20
30
20
40
 
 
Sex, no. (%)      
F32 (27.12)84 (28.28)30 (23.26)146 (26.84)1.070.59
M86 (72.12)213 (71.72)98 (75.97)397 (72.98)  

*Comparison between Hajj seasons.

*Comparison between Hajj seasons.

Molecular Characterization of Viral Agents

We used the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN) to extract viral RNA from antigenically positive samples for rotavirus, norovirus, and astrovirus according to the manufacturer’s instruction. We performed reverse transcription by using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and PCR amplification by using Platinum Taq DNA Polymerase High Fidelity (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and previously described primers for the detection of rotavirus (), norovirus (), and astrovirus (). Primer details and expected PCR fragment size are provided (Technical Appendix Table 2). We purified PCR products by using the MinElute Gel Extraction kit (QIAGEN); sequencing was performed on an ABI 3730xl (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at the Bioscience Core Laboratory at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology. We used BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor 7.2.6.1 (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/page2.html) to trim and align bidirectional sequence reads and used the consensus sequences to identify the viral genotype. We identified rotavirus genotypes by using RotaC version 2.0 software () and noroviruses by using genotyping tool version 1.0 (). We used previously described phylogenetic analyses to identify astrovirus genotypes ().
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of persons who acquired enteric infections during their travel for Hajj, 2011–2013

CharacteristicYear
TotalStatistical analyses*
201120122013χ2p value
Hospitalization, no. (%)      
Outpatient94 (79.66)263 (88.55)116 (89.92)473 (86.95)7.540.02
Inpatient24 (20.34)33 (11.11)13 (10.08)70 (12.87)  
Not defined
0
1 (0.34)
0
1 (0.18)
 
 
Stool consistency, no. (%)      
Unformed†57 (48.31)187 (62.96)76 (58.91)320 (58.82)9.190.01
Watery‡60 (50.85)101 (34.01)48 (37.12)209 (38.42)  
Not defined
1 (0.85)
9 (3.03)
5 (3.88)
15 (2.76)
 
 
Abdominal pain/cramp, no. (%)      
Yes106 (89.83)282 (94.95)103 (79.84)491 (90.26)  
No0000  
Not defined
12 (10.17)
15 (5.05)
26 (20.16)
53 (9.74)
 
 
Bowel movements/d, no. (%)      
<39 (7.63)5 (1.68)3 (2.33)17 (3.13)11.210.02
3–578 (66.1)212 (71.38)76 (58.91)366 (67.28)  
>519 (16.1)65 (21.89)24 (18.6)108 (19.85)  
Not defined
12 (10.17)
15 (5.05)
26 (20.16)
53 (9.74)
 
 
Duration of diarrhea, d, no. (%)      
<261 (51.69)140 (47.14)67 (51.94)268 (49.26)2.990.56
3–542 (35.59)119 (40.07)42 (32.56)203 (37.32)  
>512 (10.17)24 (8.08)8 (6.2)44 (8.09)  
Not defined
3 (2.54)
14 (4.71)
12 (9.3)
29 (5.33)
 
 
Presence of mucus, no. (%)      
Yes38 (32.2)165 (55.56)41 (31.78)244 (44.85)32.08<0.001
No80 (67.8)126 (42.42)86 (66.67)292 (53.68)  
Not defined
0
6 (2.02)
2 (1.55)
8 (1.47)
 
 
Presence of blood, no. (%)      
Yes14 (11.86)26 (8.75)11 (8.53)51 (9.38)0.980.61
No104 (88.14)265 (89.23)116 (89.92)485 (89.15)  
Not defined
0
6 (2.02)
2 (1.55)
8 (1.47)
 
 
Vomiting, no. (%)      
Yes33 (27.97)80 (26.94)12 (9.3)125 (22.98)17.92<0.001
No85 (72.03)211 (71.04)115 (89.15)411 (75.55)  
Not defined
0
6 (2.02)
2 (1.55)
8 (1.47)
 
 
Fever, no. (%)§      
No fever 87 (73.73)167 (56.23)103 (79.84)357 (65.63)26.90<0.001
Moderate23 (19.49)72 (24.24)25 (19.34)120 (22.06)  
Severe3 (2.54)32 (10.77)1 (0.78)36 (6.62)  
Not defined
5 (4.24)
26 (8.75)
0
31 (5.7)
 
 
Dehydration, no. (%)¶      
Yes42 (35.59)53 (17.85)39 (30.23)134 (24.63)16.89<0.001
No76 (64.41)238 (80.13)85 (65.89)399 (73.35)  
Not defined06 (2.02)5 (3.88)11 (2.02)  

*Comparison between Hajj seasons.
†Bristol 6.
‡Bristol 7. 
§Moderate fever defined as >37.5°C and <39.0°C; severe fever defined as >39.0°C.
¶Dehydration defined as >2 of the following signs or symptoms: thirst, dry mouth, weakness/light headedness, and darkening of the urine/decrease in urination.

*Comparison between Hajj seasons.
†Bristol 6.
‡Bristol 7. 
§Moderate fever defined as >37.5°C and <39.0°C; severe fever defined as >39.0°C.
¶Dehydration defined as >2 of the following signs or symptoms: thirst, dry mouth, weakness/light headedness, and darkening of the urine/decrease in urination.

Molecular Characterization of β-Lactamase Genes

We further screened the samples positive for 1 of the Enterobacteriaceae species for the detection of β-lactamase genes (blaCTX-M-15, blaIMP, blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA-48, and blaVIM) as previously described (). The list of primers used in the detection of β-lactamase genes and the expected PCR fragment sizes are provided (Technical Appendix Table 3).
Table 3

Characteristics of etiologic agents associated with enteric infections among persons infected during their travel for Hajj, 2011–2013*

 
CharacteristicYear
Total
201120122013
No. screened samples118297129544
Samples positive for agent, no. (%)
51 (43.22)
120 (40.40)
57 (44.19)
228 (41.91)
Bacterial agents, no. (%)41 (34.75)96 (32.32)52 (40.31)189 (34.74)
Salmonella 13 (11.02)25 (8.42)24 (18.6)62 (11.4)
Shigella/EIEC5 (4.24)28 (9.43)8 (6.2)41 (7.54)
ETEC12 (10.17)29 (9.76)7 (5.43)48 (8.82)
EPEC3 (2.54)5 (1.68)8 (6.2)16 (2.94)
EHEC2 (1.69)2 (0.67)04 (0.74)
DAEC3 (2.54)1 (0.34)3 (2.33)7 (1.29)
EAEC3 (2.54)2 (0.67)2 (1.55)7 (1.29)
Yersinia enterocolitica
0
4 (1.35)
0
4 (0.74)
Viral agents, no. (%)6 (5.08)7 (2.36)1 (0.78)14 (2.57)
Astrovirus02 (0.67)1 (0.78)3 (0.55)
Norovirus2 (1.69)2 (0.67)04 (0.74)
Rotavirus4 (3.39)2 (0.67)06 (1.1)
Adenovirus
0
1 (0.34)
0
1 (0.18)
Parasitic agents, no. (%)3 (2.54)8 (2.69)1 (0.78)12 (2.21)
Giardia 3 (2.54)6 (2.02)1 (0.78)10 (1.84)
Cryptosporidium
0
2 (0.67)
0
2 (0.37)
Mixed infectious agents, no. (%)1 (0.85)9 (3.03)3 (2.33)13 (2.39)
Bacteria and virus05 (1.68)†1 (0.78)‡6 (1.1)
Bacteria and parasite1 (0.85)§4 (1.35)¶1 (0.78)#6 (1.1)
Bacteria, virus, and parasite001 (0.78)**1 (0.18)

*EAEC, enteroaggregative Escherichia coli; EHEC, enterohemorrhagic E. coli; EIEC, enteroinvasive E. coli; EPEC, enteropathogenic E. coli; ETEC, enterotoxigenic E. coli; DAEC, diffusely adherent E. coli.
†Salmonella and rotavirus G1P[8], Shigella/EIEC and astrovirus HAstV2, ETEC and astrovirus HAstV2, Salmonella and adenovirus, and EPEC and rotavirus G1P[8].
‡EPEC and adenovirus.
§Salmonella and Giardia.
¶EPEC and Giardia, EAEC and Giardia, ETEC and Giardia, and Salmonella and Giardia.
#EPEC and Cryptosporidium.
**EPEC, adenovirus, and Giardia.

*EAEC, enteroaggregative Escherichia coli; EHEC, enterohemorrhagic E. coli; EIEC, enteroinvasive E. coli; EPEC, enteropathogenic E. coli; ETEC, enterotoxigenic E. coli; DAEC, diffusely adherent E. coli.
†Salmonella and rotavirus G1P[8], Shigella/EIEC and astrovirus HAstV2, ETEC and astrovirus HAstV2, Salmonella and adenovirus, and EPEC and rotavirus G1P[8].
‡EPEC and adenovirus.
§Salmonella and Giardia.
¶EPEC and Giardia, EAEC and Giardia, ETEC and Giardia, and Salmonella and Giardia.
#EPEC and Cryptosporidium.
**EPEC, adenovirus, and Giardia.

Statistical Analysis

We evaluated the differences between the sets of the categorical data by using the Pearson χ2 test. We defined statistical significance as p<0.05.

Results

Demographic and Clinical Features of the Patients

During 3 consecutive Hajj seasons (2011–2013), we collected 544 fecal samples from pilgrims who had diarrhea while performing Hajj and who sought treatment at healthcare facilities (Tables 1, 2). These patients originated from 40 countries on 5 continents (Technical Appendix Table 4). Most patients (434, 79.8%) originated from 7 countries: Saudi Arabia (24.82%, n = 135), Nigeria (15.07%, n = 82), Egypt (12.87%, n = 70), Bangladesh (8.09%, n = 44), Pakistan (6.43%, n = 35), Yemen (6.25%, n = 34), and India (6.25%, n = 34). Median (+quartile deviation) patient age was 40.17 (+13.17) years. By Hajj season, median age was 40 (+12.25) years in 2011, 40 (+13.25) in 2012, and 40.5 (+14) years in 2013 (Table 1). Most patients were men (72.98%, n = 397); women represented 27.12% of patients in 2011, 28.28% in 2012, and 23.26% in 2013 (Table 1).
Table 4

Relationship between severity of diarrheal disease and identified etiologic agents among persons who acquired enteric infections during their travel for Hajj, 2011–2013*

 
CategorySeverity of diarrheal disease
Statistical analyses
SevereMildχ2p value
Total no. cases412132  
Positive for etiologic agent, no. (%)
185 (44.9)
43 (32.58)

6.24†
0.01
Bacterial agents, no. (%)153 (37.14)36 (27.27)4.29‡0.04
Salmonella 45 (10.92)17 (12.88)4.19§0.04
Shigella/EIEC35 (8.5)6 (4.55)  
ETEC43 (10.44)5 (3.79)5.49¶0.019
EPEC13 (3.16)3 (2.27)  
EHEC3 (0.73)1 (0.76)  
DAEC7 (1.7)0  
EAEC5 (1.21)2 (1.52)  
Yersinia enterocolitica
2 (0.49)
2 (1.52)

 
 
Viral agents, no. (%)13 (3.16)1 (0.76)2.290.13
Astrovirus2 (0.49)1 (0.76)  
Norovirus4 (0.97)0  
Rotavirus6 (1.46)0  
Adenovirus
1 (0.24)
0

 
 
Parasitic agents, no. (%)10 (2.43)2 (1.52)0.390.53
Giardia 8 (1.94)2 (1.52)  
Cryptosporidium
2 (0.49)
0

 
 
Mixed infectious agents, no. (%)9 (2.18)4 (3.03)0.310.58
Bacteria and virus4 (0.97)2 (1.52)  
Bacteria and parasite5 (1.21)1 (0.76)  
Bacteria, virus, and parasite01 (0.76)  

*EAEC, enteroaggregative Escherichia coli; EHEC, enterohemorrhagic E. coli; EIEC, enteroinvasive E. coli; EPEC, enteropathogenic E. coli; ETEC, enterotoxigenic E. coli; DAEC, diffusely adherent E. coli; OR, odds ratio.
†Compared with total number of cases. OR 1.69, p=0.01.
‡Compared with total number of cases. OR 1.58, p=0.04. 
§Compared with total number of positive bacteria. OR 0.47, p=0.04. 
¶Compared with total number of cases. OR 2.96, p=0.02.

*EAEC, enteroaggregative Escherichia coli; EHEC, enterohemorrhagic E. coli; EIEC, enteroinvasive E. coli; EPEC, enteropathogenic E. coli; ETEC, enterotoxigenic E. coli; DAEC, diffusely adherent E. coli; OR, odds ratio.
†Compared with total number of cases. OR 1.69, p=0.01.
‡Compared with total number of cases. OR 1.58, p=0.04. 
§Compared with total number of positive bacteria. OR 0.47, p=0.04. 
¶Compared with total number of cases. OR 2.96, p=0.02. We summarized the distribution of the clinical features among the patients during the 3 Hajj seasons (Table 2). Most patients were seen as outpatients (86.95%, n = 473), and the most frequently reported symptoms were abdominal pain/cramp (90.26%, n = 491), presence of mucus in the stool (44.85%, n = 244), watery diarrhea (38.42%, n = 209), dehydration (24.63%, n = 134), vomiting (22.98%, n = 125), and moderate fever (22.06%, n = 120). Less common symptoms were bloody stool (9.38%, n = 51) and severe fever (6.62%, n = 36). We observed significant differences in the frequencies of these symptoms across the 3 Hajj seasons (Table 2).

Characterization of Bacterial Pathogens

We screened the 544 fecal samples collected from the patients during the 2011–2013 Hajj seasons for 16 infectious agents, including bacteria, viruses, and parasites commonly associated with diarrheal infections. We calculated the number of the samples tested and the number and percentage of the positive samples from each season (Table 3). We detected >1 of the pathogens screened for in 41.91% (n = 228) of the samples. We observed no significant difference between the numbers of positive samples during the 3 seasons (χ2 = 0.63; p = 0.73). The percentages of positive samples detected were 43.22% (n = 51) for 2011, 40.40% (n = 120) for 2012, and 44.19% (n = 57) for 2013. Bacterial pathogens were the predominant infectious agents detected for the 3 Hajj seasons and the agents identified in 34.74% (n = 189) of the total samples, followed by viral (2.57%, n = 14) and parasitic (2.21%, n = 12) agents. Thirteen patients (representing 2.39% of the total samples) had samples testing positive for >1 pathogen. We observed no significant difference in the distribution of infectious agents across the 3 seasons (χ2 = 8.84; p = 0.18). We calculated the distribution of patients by age group and the enteric pathogens identified (Figure, panels A, B). The highest proportion of patients having diarrhea of known etiology, compared with unknown, was the <20-year-old age group (odds ratio [OR] 2.46; p = 0.0002). Conversely, the highest proportion of patients having diarrhea of unknown etiology compared with known was the 40–60 years age group (OR 0.52; p = 0.0004). For most of the age groups, bacteria were the main cause of diarrhea in patients, with no significant difference detected across the 3 Hajj seasons (χ2 = 8.59; p = 0.2).
Figure

Distribution of infectious agents among persons who acquired enteric infections during their travel for Hajj, 2011–2013, by age group. A) Identified versus unidentified samples; B) type of pathogen; C) bacterial agent. Bacterial agents were the most predominant pathogen detected among all age groups. NI, age not identified.

Distribution of infectious agents among persons who acquired enteric infections during their travel for Hajj, 2011–2013, by age group. A) Identified versus unidentified samples; B) type of pathogen; C) bacterial agent. Bacterial agents were the most predominant pathogen detected among all age groups. NI, age not identified. We also calculated the distribution of the bacterial agents associated with the diarrheal patients during 2011–2013 Hajj seasons by age group (Figure, panel C). E. coli was the most frequent species present, detected in 43.39% (n = 82) of the bacteria-positive samples. Of the serovars tested, ETEC was the most common, detected in 25.4% (n = 48) of the positive samples, followed by enteropathogenic E. coli (8.47%, n = 16), enteroaggregative E. coli (3.7%, n = 7), diffusely adherent E. coli (3.7%, n = 7), and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (2.12%, n = 4). We detected Salmonella spp. in 32.80% (n = 62) and Shigella/EIEC in 21.69% (n = 41) of the bacteria-positive samples. We observed significant differences in the distribution of bacterial pathogens across the 3 Hajj seasons (χ2 = 12.89; p = 0.01) and among the different age groups (χ2 = 21.62; p = 0.01).

Characterization of Viral and Parasitic Pathogens

We calculated the distribution of the viral and parasitic agents associated with diarrheal infections of pilgrims during the 2011–2013 Hajj seasons (Table 3). Screening for adenoviruses, astroviruses, noroviruses, and rotaviruses showed rotaviruses were most common, detected in 42.86% (n = 6) of the samples positive for the screened viruses. Astroviruses were detected in 21.43% (n = 3), noroviruses in 28.57% (n = 4), and adenoviruses in 7.14% (n = 1) of the virus-positive samples. We used reverse transcription PCR and Sanger sequencing to determine the genotypes of the astroviruses, noroviruses, and rotaviruses detected (Technical Appendix Table 5). All norovirus genotypes identified were recovered from pilgrims from inside Saudi Arabia. Also, 80% of the identified astrovirus genotypes were recovered only from pilgrims from inside Saudi Arabia (astrovirus 2 or 5), whereas the single astrovirus 1 genotype was recovered from a pilgrim from Morocco (Technical Appendix Table 5). Giardia spp. was the most common parasitic agent, identified in 83.33% (n = 10) of the parasite-positive samples, followed by Cryptosporidium spp. in 16.66% (n = 2) of the samples. We isolated Giardia spp. from patients originating from 10 countries: 4 from Pakistan, 3 from Nigeria, 2 from Bangladesh, and 1 each from Ethiopia, Somalia, Egypt, Jordan, Niger, India, and Afghanistan. We identified Cryptosporidium spp. in 2 children (<5 years of age) from Saudi Arabia and 1 older pilgrim (65 years of age) from Chad (Technical Appendix Table 6).

Relationship between Severity of Diarrheal Disease and Etiologic Agent

We calculated the distribution of the etiologic agents by severity of disease (Table 4). The percentage of samples with identified etiologic agents was significantly higher in patients with severe cases compared with those with mild cases (OR 1.69; p = 0.01). Similarly, the percentage of bacterial agents was significantly higher in patients with severe cases compared with those with mild cases (OR 1.58; p = 0.04). The main bacterial contributors to the severe disease of Hajj-associated diarrheal illness were Salmonella, Shigella/EIEC, and ETEC.

Antimicrobial Drug Resistance

We calculated the distribution of β-lactamase genes among the identified bacterial samples (Table 5). blaCTX-M-15 and blaNDM were the most common antimicrobial resistance genes, associated predominantly with Salmonella (n = 25/62) and ETEC (n = 16/48). This finding suggests that 40.32% of Salmonella infections and 33.33% ETEC infections associated with the Hajj might be resistant to at least some third-generation cephalosporins, and this number might be growing with successive seasons.
Table 5

Distribution of β-lactamase genes among the identified bacterial agents among persons who acquired enteric infections during their travel for Hajj, 2011–2013*

Year/bacteriaβ-lactamase genes
bla CTX-M-15 bla NDM bla KPC bla IMP bla OXA-48 bla VIM
2011







Salmonella 3+2†2†0000
Shigella/EIEC1+1†1†0000
ETEC3+4†4†0000
EAEC300000
EHEC200000
DAEC
0
1
0
0
0
0
2012
Salmonella 630000
Shigella/EIEC400000
ETEC5+1†1†0000
EPEC100000
EHEC200000
Yersinia enterocolitica
2+1†
1†
0
0
0
0
2013
Salmonella 10+1†1†0000
Shigella/EIEC300000
ETEC2+1†1†0000
EPEC6+1†1†0000
EAEC100000

*EAEC, enteroaggregative Escherichia coli; EHEC, enterohemorrhagic E. coli; EIEC, enteroinvasive E. coli; EPEC, enteropathogenic E. coli; ETEC, enterotoxigenic E. coli; DAEC, diffusely adherent E. coli.
†Multidrug-resistant; both blaCTX-M-15 and blaNDM were detected.

*EAEC, enteroaggregative Escherichia coli; EHEC, enterohemorrhagic E. coli; EIEC, enteroinvasive E. coli; EPEC, enteropathogenic E. coli; ETEC, enterotoxigenic E. coli; DAEC, diffusely adherent E. coli.
†Multidrug-resistant; both blaCTX-M-15 and blaNDM were detected.

Discussion

Enteric infections are commonly associated with mass gathering events, including the annual Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca, Saudi Arabia. The host country and the country of origin of many of the pilgrims are endemic for enteric pathogens and increasingly high levels of antimicrobial resistance. In addition, the lack of effective vaccines against major bacterial infections is challenging (). These circumstances raise serious public health challenges for Saudi Arabia, with potential intercontinental and global implications. A key challenge is the paucity of information available on the structure of the circulating enteric pathogens during Hajj. Comprehensive information on the etiologic agents associated with Hajj-associated diarrheal disease is lacking (). Recent studies have found increased rates of carriage of multidrug-resistant bacteria, including Salmonella spp., () E. coli (), and Acinetobacter baumannii () in pilgrims returning home to France after performing Hajj. However, these studies have only focused on colonization by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in a particular host population. In this study, we used integrated antigenic and molecular approaches to screen 544 fecal samples from pilgrims with medically attended diarrheal illness for 16 pathogens to identify the etiologic agents responsible for patients seeking care at healthcare facilities during 3 consecutive Hajj seasons. Bacterial pathogens were the most common causes of Hajj-associated diarrheal disease, followed by viruses and parasites, and this pattern was maintained during all 3 seasons. Our data demonstrate that Hajj-associated diarrheal disease is usually caused by 1 bacterial agent, with ETEC, Salmonella spp., and Shigella/EIEC being the most common. This association is distinct to the pattern of travelers’ diarrhea observed in travelers from Finland, where multiple bacterial pathogens have been identified in 53% of patients with ongoing diarrhea and 25% of those without symptoms (). However, this observation is not surprising; Hajj-associated diarrheal disease is likely to be different from travelers’ diarrhea because of the different populations involved. Most of Hajj pilgrims originate from intermediate- and high-risk regions for enteric pathogens. In contrast, many travelers’ diarrhea patients are nonimmune persons from developed countries who are naive to many of the enteric pathogens encountered and thus are more highly susceptible to infection when traveling overseas (). Viruses ranked second and parasites third as the most commonly detected pathogens in patients with Hajj-associated diarrhea. Of note, all of the identified noroviruses and most astroviruses and rotaviruses were recovered from pilgrims from inside Saudi Arabia. The emergent norovirus genotype GII.4 that was first identified in Sydney, Australia, in 2012 and subsequently resulted in global outbreaks had already begun circulating among pilgrims from Saudi Arabia in late October and early November of the 2012 Hajj season. Major causes of diarrhea among children living in Saudi Arabia include rotaviruses (accounting for 6.0% incidence), noroviruses (3.5%), astroviruses (1.9%), and adenoviruses (1.4%) (). The 3 most commonly identified bacteria in our study (Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., and E. coli) have all been identified by the World Health Organization as being among the top 9 bacteria likely to have a serious impact on global public health (). Of particular concern were the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) (primarily blaCTX-M-15) and carbapenemase (e.g., blaNDM) genes in ≈40% of Salmonella spp. and E. coli–positive samples collected. Recently, travelers’ diarrhea has been shown to be an independent risk factor for contracting ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) but not carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), with the rate of acquisition varying by destination (). Saudi Arabia and the countries of origin for many of the pilgrims are countries at high risk for the acquisition of diarrheal (,) and ESBL-PE infections (). Recent surveillance studies have also reported increasing prevalence of CPE and ESBL-PE isolates in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries (), with some research institutes in Saudi Arabia finding that up to 65% of E. coli isolates are ESBL producers (). Recently, the rates of blaCTX-M-15 infection in Hajj pilgrims have been found to be 31% in 2013 and 34.83% in 2014 (). Collectively, these results suggest that further epidemiologic investigations need to be carried out during pilgrimages to identify potential food sources of pilgrim infections. In addition, antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing is needed to inform treatment. This study used a retrospective approach and 1 anonymized specimen from each patient enrolled in the study. One advantage of this approach is that the study population is more representative of the highly diverse Hajj population, with samples collected from patients originating from 40 different countries. However, a prospective approach with pre- and post-Hajj samples collected from each patient would have provided information on the role of the pilgrimage in contracting the pathogens identified. In addition, even though integrated molecular and antigenic approaches were used, >50% of the tested samples had no identifiable etiologic agent. These samples require further examination using more comprehensive high-throughput sequencing and metagenomic approaches. High-throughput shotgun sequencing has been used successfully to study population structures and define the epidemiologic links of many enteric pathogens (–). Moreover, metagenomic approaches have been used successfully to identify viral (,) and bacterial () agents associated with enteric infections. This approach could enable estimation of the ratio of pathogenic to commensal bacteria in pilgrims’ guts, thereby characterizing the acquisition of potential pathogens and their dynamics before and during infections. Finally, in this study, the assessment of antimicrobial drug susceptibility was only performed by detecting resistance-related genes. The presence of such genes does not necessarily mean the pathogen identified is carrying them, and these genes might be associated with other commensal carriage. We focused on those resistance genes that are posing the most risk to global health and can be easily shared among the Enterobacteriaceae, rather than the genes that can confer resistance to the antibiotics widely used for treating enteric infections. The data we have collected are alarming and highlight the need for further studies to explore the impact of Hajj on public health in Saudi Arabia and globally. Longitudinal studies are required to monitor the changes in colonization patterns of pilgrims during the Hajj, identify the key factors that control these changes, detect the emergence of novel variants (particularly those associated with drug resistance), and understand the dynamics of disease transmission. In addition, active surveillance for enteric diseases is needed to define the potential impact of Hajj on the baseline status of enteric infections in residents of Saudi Arabia and to investigate foodborne outbreaks of disease in a timely manner.

Technical Appendix

Description of primers used and additional characteristics of enteric infections associated with travel for Hajj, 2011–2013.
  44 in total

1.  The strategic plan for combating antimicrobial resistance in Gulf Cooperation Council States.

Authors:  Hanan H Balkhy; Abdullah M Assiri; Haifa Al Mousa; Seif S Al-Abri; Huda Al-Katheeri; Huda Alansari; Najiba M Abdulrazzaq; Awa Aidara-Kane; Didier Pittet
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Prospective study of pathogens in asymptomatic travellers and those with diarrhoea: aetiological agents revisited.

Authors:  T Lääveri; J Antikainen; S H Pakkanen; J Kirveskari; A Kantele
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Pattern of medical diseases and determinants of prognosis of hospitalization during 2005 Muslim pilgrimage Hajj in a tertiary care hospital. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nasim A Khan; Adam M Ishag; Maha S Ahmad; Fifi M El-Sayed; Zakeyah A Bachal; Tahir G Abbas
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Molecular epidemiology of astrovirus infection in Barcelona, Spain.

Authors:  Susana Guix; Santiago Caballero; Cristina Villena; Rosa Bartolomé; Cristina Latorre; Nuria Rabella; Maria Simó; Albert Bosch; Rosa M Pintó
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Acquisition of extended-spectrum cephalosporin- and colistin-resistant Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Newport by pilgrims during Hajj.

Authors:  Abiola Olumuyiwa Olaitan; Ndèye Méry Dia; Philippe Gautret; Samir Benkouiten; Khadidja Belhouchat; Tassadit Drali; Philippe Parola; Philippe Brouqui; Ziad Memish; Didier Raoult; Jean-Marc Rolain
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 6.  Diarrhea at the Hajj and Umrah.

Authors:  Philippe Gautret; Samir Benkouiten; Shruti Sridhar; Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Travel Med Infect Dis       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 6.211

7.  Detection of Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica, Vibrio cholerae, and Campylobacter spp. enteropathogens by 3-reaction multiplex polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Oscar G Gómez-Duarte; Jing Bai; Elizabeth Newell
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000.

Authors:  Li Liu; Hope L Johnson; Simon Cousens; Jamie Perin; Susana Scott; Joy E Lawn; Igor Rudan; Harry Campbell; Richard Cibulskis; Mengying Li; Colin Mathers; Robert E Black
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Molecular characterization of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in the countries of the Gulf cooperation council: dominance of OXA-48 and NDM producers.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Anna L Sartor; Hanan H Balkhy; Timothy R Walsh; Sameera M Al Johani; Reem Y AlJindan; Mubarak Alfaresi; Emad Ibrahim; Amina Al-Jardani; Seif Al-Abri; Jameela Al Salman; Ali A Dashti; Abdullah H Kutbi; Sanmarié Schlebusch; Hanna E Sidjabat; David L Paterson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  8 in total

1.  Extra-intestinal Salmonellosis in a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Nada A Alharbi; Thamir S Alsaeed; Arwa S Aljohany; Khulood K Alwehaibi; Munira A Almasaad; Rawan M Alotaibi; Basil J Alotaibi; Ebtihal A Alamoudi
Journal:  Sudan J Paediatr       Date:  2021

2.  Evaluation of the rate, pattern and appropriateness of antibiotic prescription in a cohort of pilgrims suffering from upper respiratory tract infection during the 2018 Hajj season.

Authors:  Hamid Bokhary; Hajj Research Team; Osamah Barasheed; Hala B Othman; Burhanudin Saha; Harunor Rashid; Grant A Hill-Cawthorne; Moataz Abd El Ghany
Journal:  Access Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  Hajj, Umrah, and the neglected tropical diseases.

Authors:  Mashal M Almutairi; Waleed Saleh Alsalem; Mazen Hassanain; Peter J Hotez
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-08-16

4.  Genomic characterization of NDM-1 and 5, and OXA-181 carbapenemases in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Moataz Abd El Ghany; Hazem Sharaf; Mohamed H Al-Agamy; Atef Shibl; Grant A Hill-Cawthorne; Pei-Ying Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Infectious Diseases and Mass Gatherings.

Authors:  Van-Thuan Hoang; Philippe Gautret
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Pilot Survey of Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions of Hajj Deployed Health Care Workers on Antibiotics and Antibiotic Prescriptions for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections: Results from Two Hajj Seasons.

Authors:  Hamid Bokhary; Osamah Barasheed; Moataz Abd El Ghany; Ameneh Khatami; Grant A Hill-Cawthorne; Harunor Rashid
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-29

Review 7.  Bat-Borne Coronaviruses in Jordan and Saudi Arabia: A Threat to Public Health?

Authors:  Laith N Al-Eitan; Amneh H Tarkhan; Mansour A Alghamdi; Denise A Marston; Guanghui Wu; Lorraine M McElhinney; Ian H Brown; Anthony R Fooks
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.048

8.  Gastrointestinal symptoms and knowledge and practice of pilgrims regarding food and water safety during the 2019 Hajj mass gathering.

Authors:  Saber Yezli; Yara Yassin; Abdulaziz Mushi; Alhanouf Aburas; Lamis Alabdullatif; Mariyyah Alburayh; Anas Khan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.