B Catharine Craven1,2,3, Lora M Giangregorio1,3, S Mohammad Alavinia1, Lindsie A Blencowe1, Naaz Desai1, Sander L Hitzig1,4, Kei Masani1,5, Milos R Popovic1,5. 1. a Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - UHN , Toronto , ON , Canada. 2. b Department of Medcine , University of Toronto , Toronto , ON , Canada. 3. c University of Waterloo , Waterloo , ON , Canada. 4. d Sunnybrook Research Institute - Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre , Toronto , ON , Canada. 5. e Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering BBME, University of Toronto , Toronto , ON , Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation therapy assisted walking (FES-T) compared to a conventional aerobic and resistance training (CONV) with respect to bone biomarkers and lower extremity bone strength outcomes among adults with chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Parallel group randomized controlled trial ( www.clinicaltrials.gov - NCT0020196819). Site: Tertiary academic rehabilitation centre in Canada. METHODS:Adults with chronic (≥18 months) motor incomplete SCI (C2-T12 AIS C-D) were consented and randomized to FES-T or CONV training for 45 minutes thrice-weekly for 4 months. Osteocalcin (OC), β-cross laps (CTX) and sclerostin were assessed at baseline, and 4 months. Similarly, total hip, distal femur and proximal tibia region bone mineral density (BMD) via DXA (4500A, Hologic Inc. Waltham, MA, USA) and tibia bone quality via pQCT (Stratec XCT-2000, Mezintecknik, Pforzheim, Germany) were assessed at baseline, 4, and 12 months. Between group differences were analyzed using repeated measures general linear models. RESULTS:Thirty-four participants (17 FES-T, 17 CONV) consented and were randomized, 27 participants completed the 4-month intervention and 12-month outcome assessments. Participants in the FES-T arm had a decrease in CTX and a significant increase in OC at intervention completion (P<0.05). Significant biomarker changes were not observed in the CONV group. No within or between group differences from baseline were observed in sclerostin or bone strength. CONCLUSIONS: Four months of FES-T improved bone turnover (increase in OC and decrease in CTX) but not bone strength among individuals with chronic SCI. Future, long term FES-T may augment lower extremity bone strength.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation therapy assisted walking (FES-T) compared to a conventional aerobic and resistance training (CONV) with respect to bone biomarkers and lower extremity bone strength outcomes among adults with chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Parallel group randomized controlled trial ( www.clinicaltrials.gov - NCT0020196819). Site: Tertiary academic rehabilitation centre in Canada. METHODS: Adults with chronic (≥18 months) motor incomplete SCI (C2-T12 AIS C-D) were consented and randomized to FES-T or CONV training for 45 minutes thrice-weekly for 4 months. Osteocalcin (OC), β-cross laps (CTX) and sclerostin were assessed at baseline, and 4 months. Similarly, total hip, distal femur and proximal tibia region bone mineral density (BMD) via DXA (4500A, Hologic Inc. Waltham, MA, USA) and tibia bone quality via pQCT (Stratec XCT-2000, Mezintecknik, Pforzheim, Germany) were assessed at baseline, 4, and 12 months. Between group differences were analyzed using repeated measures general linear models. RESULTS: Thirty-four participants (17 FES-T, 17 CONV) consented and were randomized, 27 participants completed the 4-month intervention and 12-month outcome assessments. Participants in the FES-T arm had a decrease in CTX and a significant increase in OC at intervention completion (P<0.05). Significant biomarker changes were not observed in the CONV group. No within or between group differences from baseline were observed in sclerostin or bone strength. CONCLUSIONS: Four months of FES-T improved bone turnover (increase in OC and decrease in CTX) but not bone strength among individuals with chronic SCI. Future, long term FES-T may augment lower extremity bone strength.
Authors: Leslie R Morse; Supreetha Sudhakar; Valery Danilack; Carlos Tun; Antonio Lazzari; David R Gagnon; Eric Garshick; Ricardo A Battaglino Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Christopher C H Yip; Chor-Yin Lam; Kenneth M C Cheung; Yat Wa Wong; Paul A Koljonen Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 4.003