Literature DB >> 28929509

Task-dependent output of human parasternal intercostal motor units across spinal levels.

Anna L Hudson1,2, Simon C Gandevia1,2, Jane E Butler1,2.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: During breathing, there is differential activity in the human parasternal intercostal muscles and the activity is tightly coupled to the known mechanical advantages for inspiration of the same regions of muscles. It is not known whether differential activity is preserved for the non-respiratory task of ipsilateral trunk rotation. In the present study, we compared single motor units during resting breathing and axial rotation of the trunk during apnoea. We not only confirmed non-uniform recruitment of motor units across parasternal intercostal muscles in breathing, but also demonstrated that the same motor units show an altered pattern of recruitment in the non-respiratory task of trunk rotation. The output of parasternal intercostal motoneurones is modulated differently across spinal levels depending on the task and these results help us understand the mechanisms that may govern task-dependent differences in motoneurone output. ABSTRACT: During inspiration, there is differential activity in the human parasternal intercostal muscles across interspaces. We investigated whether the earlier recruitment of motor units in the rostral interspaces compared to more caudal spaces during inspiration is preserved for the non-respiratory task of ipsilateral trunk rotation. Single motor unit activity (SMU) was recorded from the first, second and fourth parasternal interspaces on the right side in five participants in two tasks: resting breathing and 'isometric' axial rotation of the trunk during apnoea. Recruitment of the same SMUs was compared between tasks (n = 123). During resting breathing, differential activity was indicated by earlier recruitment of SMUs in the first and second interspaces compared to the fourth space in inspiration (P < 0.01). By contrast, during trunk rotation, the same motor units showed an altered pattern of recruitment because SMUs in the first interspace were recruited later and at a higher rotation torque than those in the second and fourth interspaces (P < 0.05). Tested for a subset of SMUs, the reliability of the breathing and rotation tasks, as well as the SMU recruitment measures, was good-excellent [intraclass correlation (2,1): 0.69-0.91]. Thus, the output of parasternal intercostal motoneurones is modulated differently across spinal levels depending on the task. Given that the differential inspiratory output of parasternal intercostal muscles is linked to their relative mechanical effectiveness for inspiration and also that this output is altered in trunk rotation, we speculate that a mechanism matching neural drive to muscle mechanics underlies the task-dependent differences in output of axial motoneurone pools.
© 2017 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2017 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mechanical advantage; neuromechanical matching; posture

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28929509      PMCID: PMC5709319          DOI: 10.1113/JP274866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  31 in total

1.  Distribution of inspiratory drive to the external intercostal muscles in humans.

Authors:  André De Troyer; Robert B Gorman; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge.

Authors:  E HENNEMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1957-12-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Respiratory action of the intercostal muscles.

Authors:  André De Troyer; Peter A Kirkwood; Theodore A Wilson
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Coupling between mechanical and neural behaviour in the human first dorsal interosseous muscle.

Authors:  Anna L Hudson; Janet L Taylor; Simon C Gandevia; Jane E Butler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  On the mechanism of the mediolateral gradient of parasternal activation.

Authors:  A De Troyer; A Legrand; G Gayan-Ramirez; M Cappello; M Decramer
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1996-05

6.  Electrical activation to the parasternal intercostal muscles during high-frequency spinal cord stimulation in dogs.

Authors:  Anthony F DiMarco; Krzysztof E Kowalski
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-10-23

Review 7.  The neural control of human inspiratory muscles.

Authors:  Jane E Butler; Anna L Hudson; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  Midcervical neuronal discharge patterns during and following hypoxia.

Authors:  M S Sandhu; D M Baekey; N G Maling; J C Sanchez; P J Reier; D D Fuller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Rostrocaudal gradient of electrical activation in the parasternal intercostal muscles of the dog.

Authors:  A Legrand; A Brancatisano; M Decramer; A De Troyer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Inhomogeneous activation of the parasternal intercostals during breathing.

Authors:  A De Troyer; A Legrand
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1995-07
View more
  3 in total

1.  Intraspinal microstimulation for respiratory muscle activation.

Authors:  Michael D Sunshine; Comron N Ganji; Paul J Reier; David D Fuller; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Spinal decision making for respiratory muscle recruitment?

Authors:  D D Fuller
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Differences in motor unit firing properties of the vastus lateralis muscle during postural and voluntary tasks.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Aoyama; Yutaka Kohno
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.755

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.