| Literature DB >> 28928792 |
Lin Wang1,2,3, Wei-Zhi Liu1,3, Ling-Yan Pei1,3, Yu-Shi Ke1,3, Jian Cui1,3, Shu-Chun Li1,3.
Abstract
Garidisan, commonly used in Mongolia to treat ulcerative colitis (UC), contains wild poppy and Artemisia frigida Willd. Clinical evidence shows that Garidisan can effectively treat UC and that recurrence is low. Thus, we evaluated the effects of Garidisan on ulcer healing quality and the regulation of immune balance in rats with experimental UC. UC was induced by immunization with TNBS and Garidisan significantly reduced DAI, CMDI, and HS. H&E staining, SEM, and VG staining showed that Garidisan repaired damaged intestinal mucosa and significantly reduced expression of ICAM-1 and CD105 in regenerated tissues of UC rats. Collagen fibers were significantly fewer as well after treatment. Garidisan elevated EGF, VEGF, bFGF, VEGFR2, and FGFR1 of UC rats, reduced CD3+CD4+/CD3+CD8+ T cell ratios, and increased CD4+Th1/CD4+Th2 cell ratios and IFN-r/IL-4 ratios in peripheral blood of UC rats. In conclusion, Garidisan promoted tissue maturation of regenerated tissues by regulating the immune balance and improved functional maturity of regenerated tissues by reducing collagen formation, promoting maturation of new blood vessels, and increasing expression of growth factors and their receptors.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28928792 PMCID: PMC5591922 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8721257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Scoring of disease activity index.
| Weight loss (%) | Stool consistency | Occult/gross bleeding | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Normal | Normal | 0 |
| 1∼5 | 1 | ||
| 5∼10 | Loose stools | Hemoccult+ | 2 |
| 10∼20 | 3 | ||
| >20 | Diarrhea | Gross bleeding | 4 |
Note. Normal stools = well-formed pellets, loose stools = pasty and semiformed stools which do not stick to the anus, and diarrhea = liquid stools that stick to the anus.
Colonic mucosal damage index scoring criteria.
| Gross morphologies | Symptoms | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation with the surrounding tissues during sampling | No adhesion | 0 |
| Mild adhesion (colon and other tissues were easily peeled) | 1 | |
| Serious adhesion | 2 | |
|
| ||
| Inflammation and ulceration | No ulceration and inflammation | 0 |
| Local congestion and no ulceration | 1 | |
| 1 ulcer without congestion or thickening of intestinal wall | 2 | |
| 1 ulcer with inflammation | 3 | |
| ≥2 ulcers with inflammation | 4 | |
| >2 ulcers and >1 cm inflamed area | 5 | |
| Ulcers with >2 cm inflamed area and increasing 1 score for each additional 1 cm lesion | 6–8 | |
Histological scoring criteria.
| Score 0 | Score 1 | Score 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute inflammatory cell infiltration | No | Mild increase | Severe increase |
| Chronic inflammatory cell infiltration | No | Mild increase | Severe increase |
| Submucosal oedema | No | Patchy | Confluent |
| Ulcer formation | No | Yes |
Figure 1Treatment efficacy of Garidisan in UC rats; (a) DAI for rats after UC modeling; (b) colonic mucosal damage indices for rats in different treatment groups; (c) HS for rats in different treatment groups. Note that (1) represents normal controls; (2) represents the UC model group; (3) represents the low-dose Garidisan group; (4) represents the moderate-dose Garidisan group; (5) represents the high-dose Garidisan group; (6) represents the SASP group; and (7) represents the Bupiyichangwan group; P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 compared with normal controls; P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001 compared with the UC model group.
Figure 2Effects of Garidisan on the degree of maturity of regenerated mucosa. (a) Histological examination of colon tissue of experimental animals (H&E), (A1) representing 100x magnification and (A2) representing 400x magnification; (b) colonic mucosal SEM of experimental animals, (B1) representing 800x magnification and (B2) representing 5,000x magnification; (c) collagen fiber staining (VG staining) in colons of experimental animals, (C1) representing 100x magnification and (C2) representing 400x magnification. Collagen fibers in panel (c) stained purple; (d) ICAM-1 expression in colonic mucosa and submucosal epithelial of experimental animals. Blue DAPI staining represents nuclear staining, and red represents ICAM-1 expression in cy3 staining. Note that (1) represents normal controls; (2) represents the UC model group; (3) represents the low-dose Garidisan group; (4) represents the moderate-dose Garidisan group; (5) represents the high-dose Garidisan group; (6) represents the SAPA group; and (7) represents the Bupiyichangwan group.
Statistical analysis of ICAM-1 and CD105 expression in regenerated mucosa (M ± SEM, n = 8).
| ICAM-1 | CD105 | |
|---|---|---|
| Normal control group | 181.88 ± 23.62## | 16.75 ± 11.26### |
| UC model group | 3100.33 ± 916.65 | 2268.44 ± 353.60 |
| Low-dose Garidisan group | 1225.00 ± 215.24 | 1376.50 ± 296.56 |
| Moderate-dose Garidisan group | 1362.38 ± 258.00 | 591.38 ± 257.68 |
| High-dose Garidisan group | 976.25 ± 166.67 | 606.88 ± 202.88 |
| Sulfasalazine group | 1319.75 ± 360.07 | 863.25 ± 420.16 |
| Bupiyichangwan group | 2179.00 ± 514.59 | 1617.88 ± 450.23 |
P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 compared with normal controls; P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001 compared with the UC model group.
Figure 3Effects of Garidisan on immune cells in peripheral blood. (a) Flow cytometry for CD3+CD4+ T and CD3+CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood of experimental animals; (b) flow cytometry for CD4+ Th1 and CD4+ Th2 cells in peripheral blood of experimental animals; (c) statistical analysis of CD3+CD4+ T cells/CD3+CD8+ T cell ratios; (d) statistical analysis of CD4+ Th1/CD4+ Th2 ratio. Note that (A1) represents CD3+CD4+ T cells results of experimental animals; (A2) represents CD3+CD8+ T cells results of experimental animals; (B1) represents CD4+ Th1 cells results of experimental animals; (B2) represents CD4+ Th2 cells results of experimental animals; (1) represents normal controls; (2) represents the UC model group; (3) represents the low-dose Garidisan group; (4) represents the moderate-dose Garidisan group; (5) represents the high-dose Garidisan group; (6) represents the SASP group; and (7) represents the Bupiyichangwan group; P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 compared with normal controls; #P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001 compared with the UC model group.
Effect of Garidisan on IFN-r, IL-4, and IFN-r/IL-4 in peripheral blood (M ± SEM, n = 6).
| Group | IFN-r (ng/L) | IL-4 (ng/L) | IFN-r/IL-4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 1414.14 ± 118.10### | 97.26 ± 3.01### | 14.53 ± 0.88### |
| UC model | 814.95 ± 86.41 | 166.32 ± 10.60 | 4.91 ± 0.55 |
| Low-dose Garidisan | 1070.78 ± 92.88 | 133.01 ± 7.81 | 8.05 ± 0.44 |
| Moderate-dose Garidisan | 1075.57 ± 121.05 | 122.17 ± 8.93 | 8.79 ± 0.58 |
| High-dose Garidisan | 1247.53 ± 91.27 | 136.97 ± 9.09 | 9.14 ± 0.91 |
| Sulfasalazine | 1165.63 ± 50.22 | 112.27 ± 7.58 | 10.44 ± 1.06 |
| Bupiyichangwan | 1297.87 ± 66.35 | 135.42 ± 13.50 | 9.65 ± 0.97 |
P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 compared with normal controls. P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001 compared with the UC model group.
Figure 4Effects of Garidisan on functional maturity of regenerated mucosa. (a) The concentration of VEGF in serum and colon tissue homogenate; (b) The concentration of bFGF in serum and colon tissue homogenate; (c) The concentration of EGF in serum and colon tissue homogenate; (d) VEGFR expression in colons of experimental animals and statistical analysis; (e) FGFR1 expression in colons of experimental animals and statistical analysis; (f) EGFR expression in colons of experimental animals and statistical analysis; (g) CD105 expression in colons of experimental animals. Blue DAPI staining represents nuclear staining, and red represents CD105 expression in cy3 staining. Note that (1) represents normal controls; (2) represents the UC model group; (3) represents the low-dose Garidisan group; (4) represents the moderate-dose Garidisan group; (5) represents the high-dose Garidisan group; (6) represents the SASP group; and (7) represents the Bupiyichangwan group; P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 compared with normal controls; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001 compared with the UC model group.