| Literature DB >> 28928757 |
Xiaolong Wang1,2, Tianyang Ye1, Syed Tahir Ata-Ul-Karim1,3, Yan Zhu1, Leilei Liu1, Weixing Cao1, Liang Tang1.
Abstract
Precise quantification of plant nitrogen (N) nutrition status is essential for crop N management. The concept of critical N concentration (Nc) has been widely used for assessment of plant N status. This study aimed to develop a new winter wheat Nc dilution curve based on leaf area duration (LAD). Four field experiments were performed on different cultivars with different N fertilization modes in the Yangtze River basin and Yellow River basin in China. Results showed that the increase in LAD with increasing cumulative thermal time took the shape of an "S" type curve; whereas shoot N concentration decreased with increasing LAD, according to a power function. Both LAD and shoot N concentration increased with increasing N application. The new LAD based Nc dilution curve was determined and described as Nc = 1.6774 LAD-0.37 when LAD > 0.13. However, when LAD ≤ 0.13, Nc was constant and can be calculated by the equation when LAD = 0.13. The validation of Nc dilution curve with dataset acquired from independent experiments confirmed that N nutrition index (NNI) predictions based on the newly established Nc dilution curve could precisely diagnose N deficiency at different plant growth stages. The integrated N nutrition index (NNIinte), which was obtained by the weighted mean of NNI, was used to estimate shoot N concentration, shoot dry matter, LAD, and yield using regression functions. The linear relationships between NNIinte and these growth variables were well correlated. These results provided enough evidence that the new LAD-based Nc dilution curve could effectively and precisely diagnoses N deficiency in winter wheat crops.Entities:
Keywords: critical nitrogen dilution curve; leaf area duration; nitrogen nutrition index; wheat; yield
Year: 2017 PMID: 28928757 PMCID: PMC5591374 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01517
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Basic information of the four experiments.
| Exp. 1 | 2010-2011 | Type: clay soil | Yangmai16 | 0 (N0) | Top 3rd leaf emergence;70%(R1) | Spring |
| Exp. 2 | 2010-2011 | Type: clay soil | Yangmai16 | 0(N0) | Top 3rd leaf emergence(T1); 60%(R1) | Spring |
| Exp. 3 (Xinxiang, 35°11′ N, 113°48′ E) | 2011-2012 | Type: loam soil | Aikang58 | 0(N0) | Top 3rd leaf emergence;65%(R1) | Spring |
| Exp. 4 | 2010-2011 | Type: clay soil | Ningmai13 | 0(N0) | Top 3rd leaf emergence;50% | Spring |
Nitrogen concentration at different growth stages and varied N rates.
| Exp. 1 (Yizheng, 2010–2011) | N0 | 2.89c | 0.043d | 2.23d | 0.110d | 1.14d | 0.344d | 0.88d | 0.525d | 0.67c | 0.695d |
| N1R1 | 3.21b | 0.056c | 2.57bc | 0.152c | 1.57c | 0.509c | 1.65a | 0.886c | 1.09ab | 1.339c | |
| N1R2 | 3.24b | 0.061b | 2.82b | 0.166c | 1.82b | 0.583bc | 1.46b | 0.992b | 1.06b | 1.497b | |
| N1R3 | 3.34b | 0.058bc | 2.71b | 0.169bc | 1.74bc | 0.620b | 1.27c | 1.032b | 1.12a | 1.521b | |
| N1R4 | 3.33b | 0.059b | 3.06a | 0.190b | 1.93b | 0.633b | 1.61a | 1.048b | 1.05b | 1.542b | |
| N1R5 | 3.58a | 0.061b | 3.09a | 0.202a | 2.21a | 0.685b | 1.44b | 1.115b | 1.08ab | 1.619b | |
| N2R1 | 3.64a | 0.059b | 2.60bc | 0.168bc | 1.88b | 0.596bc | 1.68a | 1.020b | 1.16a | 1.538b | |
| N2R2 | 3.60a | 0.058bc | 2.54c | 0.189b | 2.21a | 0.642b | 1.53ab | 1.077b | 1.09a | 1.583b | |
| N2R3 | 3.65a | 0.062ab | 3.17a | 0.205a | 2.18a | 0.696a | 1.61a | 1.179a | 1.05b | 1.706ab | |
| N2R4 | 3.61a | 0.063a | 2.96ab | 0.217a | 2.01ab | 0.767a | 1.57a | 1.280a | 1.08ab | 1.844a | |
| N2R5 | 3.70a | 0.068a | 3.14a | 0.223a | 2.08ab | 0.775a | 1.61a | 1.275a | 1.10a | 1.820a | |
| F prob. | |||||||||||
| 0.132 | 0.005 | 0.274 | 0.021 | 0.221 | 0.078 | 0.151 | 0.091 | 0.062 | 0.172 | ||
| Exp. 2 (Yizheng, 2010–2011) | N0 | 3.07c | 0.046c | 2.05c | 0.111c | 1.05d | 0.314c | 0.94c | 0.485c | 0.83c | 0.672c |
| N1R1T1 | 3.71ab | 0.056b | 2.58b | 0.176b | 1.82b | 0.607b | 1.47b | 1.003b | 1.16b | 1.472b | |
| N1R1T2 | 3.48b | 0.045c | 2.50b | 0.158b | 1.79b | 0.576b | 1.46b | 0.944b | 1.10b | 1.348 | |
| N1R1T3 | 3.47b | 0.067a | 2.45b | 0.196a | 1.49c | 0.594b | 1.42b | 0.922b | 1.06b | 1.284b | |
| N1R2T1 | 3.93a | 0.050bc | 3.06a | 0.172b | 2.12a | 0.650ab | 1.73a | 1.059b | 1.34a | 1.537b | |
| N1R2T2 | 3.63b | 0.062a | 2.88a | 0.198a | 1.84b | 0.653ab | 1.64a | 1.058b | 1.29a | 1.561b | |
| N1R2T3 | 3.84a | 0.057b | 3.04a | 0.192a | 1.54c | 0.625b | 1.51b | 0.979b | 1.07b | 1.425b | |
| N2R1T1 | 3.81a | 0.068a | 2.83a | 0.196a | 2.39a | 0.713a | 1.55b | 1.224a | 1.37a | 1.813a | |
| N2R1T2 | 3.56b | 0.062a | 2.89a | 0.192a | 1.79b | 0.673ab | 1.66a | 1.104ab | 1.36a | 1.573b | |
| N2R1T3 | 4.03a | 0.057b | 2.79a | 0.195a | 1.59c | 0.639b | 1.51b | 1.009b | 1.27a | 1.464b | |
| N2R2T1 | 3.80a | 0.067a | 2.89a | 0.216a | 2.13a | 0.768a | 1.62a | 1.297a | 1.38a | 1.966a | |
| N2R2T2 | 3.89a | 0.061a | 2.84a | 0.205a | 1.82b | 0.716a | 1.65a | 1.212a | 1.39a | 1.854a | |
| N2R2T3 | 3.87a | 0.063a | 2.96a | 0.224a | 1.73b | 0.732a | 1.66a | 1.218a | 1.27a | 1.824a | |
| F prob. | |||||||||||
| 0.241 | 0.007 | 0.224 | 0.035 | 0.236 | 0.087 | 0.071 | 0.193 | 0.172 | 0.284 | ||
| Exp. 3 (Xinxiang, 2011–2012) | N0 | 2.86d | 0.075c | 2.77c | 0.143c | 1.34d | 0.612c | 1.38d | 0.852c | 0.95c | 1.303d |
| N1R1 | 2.96c | 0.092b | 2.50 | 0.175b | 1.71c | 0.780b | 1.47d | 1.093b | 1.09b | 1.657c | |
| N1R2 | 2.96c | 0.097b | 2.37d | 0.178b | 1.47d | 0.801b | 1.49 | 1.105b | 0.97c | 1.682bc | |
| N1R3 | 3.01bc | 0.102b | 2.85b | 0.188ab | 1.63c | 0.857b | 1.82b | 1.201b | 1.04b | 1.872b | |
| N2R1 | 3.03bc | 0.084c | 2.85b | 0.166b | 1.97b | 0.796b | 1.61c | 1.175b | 1.18a | 1.933b | |
| N2R2 | 3.08b | 0.100b | 2.55 | 0.191ab | 1.90b | 0.879b | 1.83b | 1.251b | 1.12a | 2.010ab | |
| N2R3 | 3.24a | 0.105b | 3.12a | 0.202a | 1.77c | 0.909ab | 1.75b | 1.298ab | 1.00bc | 2.097ab | |
| N3R1 | 2.92 | 0.102b | 2.85b | 0.189ab | 2.22a | 0.929ab | 2.06a | 1.348a | 1.23a | 2.240a | |
| N3R2 | 3.30a | 0.105b | 2.82b | 0.204a | 1.98b | 0.969a | 2.04a | 1.398a | 1.08b | 2.317a | |
| N3R3 | 3.29a | 0.113a | 2.91ab | 0.201a | 1.98b | 1.016a | 1.93b | 1.452a | 1.20a | 2.292a | |
| N4R1 | 3.24a | 0.115a | 2.65c | 0.222a | 2.06ab | 1.005a | 2.13a | 1.421a | 1.16a | 2.273a | |
| N4R2 | 3.31a | 0.112a | 3.06a | 0.217a | 2.26a | 1.063a | 1.98ab | 1.523a | 1.12ab | 2.415a | |
| N4R3 | 3.35a | 0.115a | 3.02a | 0.217a | 2.32a | 1.051a | 2.16a | 1.509a | 1.16a | 2.361a | |
| F prob. | |||||||||||
| 0.087 | 0.008 | 0.143 | 0.029 | 0.212 | 0.096 | 0.117 | 0.272 | 0.081 | 0.265 | ||
| Exp. 4 (Yizheng, 2010–2011) | N0 | 2.71d | 0.046d | 1.74c | 0.066d | 1.05d | 0.320d | 1.02d | 0.422d | – | – |
| N1 | 3.22c | 0.119c | 2.03b | 0.149c | 1.46bc | 0.473c | 1.10d | 0.614c | – | – | |
| N2 | 3.80ab | 0.170b | 2.10b | 0.216b | 1.60b | 0.739b | 1.37c | 0.975b | – | – | |
| N3 | 3.87ab | 0.210a | 2.18b | 0.277a | 1.83b | 0.966a | 1.75b | 1.276a | – | – | |
| N4 | 4.13a | 0.196a | 2.60a | 0.262a | 2.47a | 0.962a | 1.91a | 1.284a | – | – | |
| N5 | 3.65b | 0.228a | 2.95a | 0.295a | 2.51a | 0.991a | 2.01a | 1.317a | – | – | |
| F prob. | – | – | |||||||||
| 0.313 | 0.034 | 0.394 | 0.049 | 0.397 | 0.221 | 0.182 | 0.189 | – | – | ||
LAD, leaf area duration; Nac, shoot nitrogen concentration; LSD, least significant difference.
F statistic significant at the 0.05 probability level. Data within a column followed by a different letter are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Figure 1Determination of the LAD-based shoot critical concentration dilution curve for two wheat cultivars using the data of Experiment 1 and 3.
Figure 2Validation of the Nc dilution curves for winter wheat. Data points (Δ) represent N limiting condition, (□) represent non-N-limiting condition. The solid line indicates the Nc curves (Nc = 1.6774 LAID–0.37, while the dashed lines represent the minimum and maximum N curves respectively, (Nmin = 0.9089 LAD−0.444, Nmax = 1.8934 LAD−0.372). The (•) points represent N concentration from highest N rate and the (°) points are from zero N rate obtained from Experiments 2 and 4.
Figure 3Diagnosis of N status using the LAD-based Nc dilution curves developed in Experiment 2 (A) and 4 (B).
Figure 4Relationships between relative growth variables and integrated nitrogen nutrition index (NNIinte). (A) Nac/Nacmax; (B) LAD/LADmax; (C) DM/DMmax; (D) yield/yieldmax.
Validation of the relationships between the relative growth variables and NNIinte.
| Nac/Nacmax = 2.0603 NNIinte −1.0831 | 9.83 | 0.9753 | <0.0001 | 0.7862 |
| LAD/LADmax = 1.8813 NNIinte −0.9357 | 11.94 | 0.9672 | <0.0001 | 0.8193 |
| DM/DMmax = 1.4546 NNIinte −0.4988 | 11.99 | 0.9515 | <0.0001 | 0.7862 |
| Yield/Yieldmax = 1.4835 NNIinte −0.493 | 6.61 | 0.9829 | <0.0001 | 0.8968 |
Nac, shoot nitrogen Concentration; LAD, leaf area duration; DM, shoot dry matter.
Figure 5Comparisons of critical dilution curves based on different methods.