Literature DB >> 28927937

Evaluation of intensity drift correction strategies using MetaboDrift, a normalization tool for multi-batch metabolomics data.

Chanisa Thonusin1, Heidi B IglayReger2, Tanu Soni2, Amy E Rothberg2, Charles F Burant3, Charles R Evans4.   

Abstract

In recent years, mass spectrometry-based metabolomics has increasingly been applied to large-scale epidemiological studies of human subjects. However, the successful use of metabolomics in this context is subject to the challenge of detecting biologically significant effects despite substantial intensity drift that often occurs when data are acquired over a long period or in multiple batches. Numerous computational strategies and software tools have been developed to aid in correcting for intensity drift in metabolomics data, but most of these techniques are implemented using command-line driven software and custom scripts which are not accessible to all end users of metabolomics data. Further, it has not yet become routine practice to assess the quantitative accuracy of drift correction against techniques which enable true absolute quantitation such as isotope dilution mass spectrometry. We developed an Excel-based tool, MetaboDrift, to visually evaluate and correct for intensity drift in a multi-batch liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry (LC-MS) metabolomics dataset. The tool enables drift correction based on either quality control (QC) samples analyzed throughout the batches or using QC-sample independent methods. We applied MetaboDrift to an original set of clinical metabolomics data from a mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT). The performance of the method was evaluated for multiple classes of metabolites by comparison with normalization using isotope-labeled internal standards. QC sample-based intensity drift correction significantly improved correlation with IS-normalized data, and resulted in detection of additional metabolites with significant physiological response to the MMTT. The relative merits of different QC-sample curve fitting strategies are discussed in the context of batch size and drift pattern complexity. Our drift correction tool offers a practical, simplified approach to drift correction and batch combination in large metabolomics studies.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drift correction; Intensity drift; LC–MS; Meal tolerance test; Metabolomics; Normalization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28927937      PMCID: PMC5788449          DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  44 in total

Review 1.  Sample normalization methods in quantitative metabolomics.

Authors:  Yiman Wu; Liang Li
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  Absolute quantitation of intracellular metabolite concentrations by an isotope ratio-based approach.

Authors:  Bryson D Bennett; Jie Yuan; Elizabeth H Kimball; Joshua D Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Isotopologue ratio normalization for non-targeted metabolomics.

Authors:  Daniel Weindl; André Wegner; Christian Jäger; Karsten Hiller
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.759

4.  Continuous glucose profiles in healthy subjects under everyday life conditions and after different meals.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Sven Hagenlocher; Annette Baumstark; Nina Jendrike; Ralph C Gillen; Katja Rössner; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-09

5.  Characterising and correcting batch variation in an automated direct infusion mass spectrometry (DIMS) metabolomics workflow.

Authors:  J A Kirwan; D I Broadhurst; R L Davidson; M R Viant
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.142

6.  MetaboAnalyst 3.0--making metabolomics more meaningful.

Authors:  Jianguo Xia; Igor V Sinelnikov; Beomsoo Han; David S Wishart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Metabomxtr: an R package for mixture-model analysis of non-targeted metabolomics data.

Authors:  Michael Nodzenski; Michael J Muehlbauer; James R Bain; Anna C Reisetter; William L Lowe; Denise M Scholtens
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  metaX: a flexible and comprehensive software for processing metabolomics data.

Authors:  Bo Wen; Zhanlong Mei; Chunwei Zeng; Siqi Liu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Lessons from the mixed-meal tolerance test: use of 90-minute and fasting C-peptide in pediatric diabetes.

Authors:  Rachel E J Besser; Beverley M Shields; Rosaura Casas; Andrew T Hattersley; Johnny Ludvigsson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Improved batch correction in untargeted MS-based metabolomics.

Authors:  Ron Wehrens; Jos A Hageman; Fred van Eeuwijk; Rik Kooke; Pádraic J Flood; Erik Wijnker; Joost J B Keurentjes; Arjen Lommen; Henriëtte D L M van Eekelen; Robert D Hall; Roland Mumm; Ric C H de Vos
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.290

View more
  14 in total

1.  Untargeted Metabolomics Differentiates l-Carnitine Treated Septic Shock 1-Year Survivors and Nonsurvivors.

Authors:  Charles R Evans; Alla Karnovsky; Michael A Puskarich; George Michailidis; Alan E Jones; Kathleen A Stringer
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 2.  Promises and pitfalls of untargeted metabolomics.

Authors:  Ilya Gertsman; Bruce A Barshop
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.982

3.  Multiomics Approach Reveals an Important Role of BNIP3 in Myocardial Remodeling and the Pathogenesis of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Antoine H Chaanine; LeeAnn Higgins; Lothar Lauterboeck; Todd Markowski; Qinglin Yang; Patrice Delafontaine
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 7.666

4.  The molecular and metabolic program by which white adipocytes adapt to cool physiologic temperatures.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Mori; Colleen E Dugan; Akira Nishii; Ameena Benchamana; Ziru Li; Thomas S Cadenhead; Arun K Das; Charles R Evans; Katherine A Overmyer; Steven M Romanelli; Sydney K Peterson; Devika P Bagchi; Callie A Corsa; Julie Hardij; Brian S Learman; Mahmoud El Azzouny; Joshua J Coon; Ken Inoki; Ormond A MacDougald
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 5.  Data analysis methods for defining biomarkers from omics data.

Authors:  Chao Li; Zhenbo Gao; Benzhe Su; Guowang Xu; Xiaohui Lin
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.142

6.  Nontargeted mass spectrometry of dried blood spots for interrogation of the human circulating metabolome.

Authors:  Casey Ward; Shriram Nallamshetty; Jeramie D Watrous; Eowyn Acres; Tao Long; Ian T Mathews; Sonia Sharma; Susan Cheng; Farhad Imam; Mohit Jain
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.394

7.  Capillary Electrophoresis Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics of Plasma Samples from Healthy Subjects in a Cross-Sectional Japanese Population Study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Makoto Suzuki; Rira Matsuta; Kazunori Sasaki; Moon-Il Kang; Kenjiro Kami; Yota Tatara; Ken Itoh; Shigeyuki Nakaji
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-05-13

8.  SCOUR: a stepwise machine learning framework for predicting metabolite-dependent regulatory interactions.

Authors:  Justin Y Lee; Britney Nguyen; Carlos Orosco; Mark P Styczynski
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Metabolomic markers predictive of hepatic adaptation to therapeutic dosing of acetaminophen.

Authors:  Brandon J Sonn; Kennon J Heard; Susan M Heard; Angelo D'Alessandro; Kate M Reynolds; Richard C Dart; Barry H Rumack; Andrew A Monte
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.467

10.  Advantages of Studying the Metabolome in Response to Mixed-Macronutrient Challenges and Suggestions for Future Research Designs.

Authors:  Jennifer L LaBarre; Kanakadurga Singer; Charles F Burant
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.687

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.