Literature DB >> 28927210

Navigation and Image Injection for Control of Bone Removal and Osteotomy Planes in Spine Surgery.

Michael Kosterhon, Angelika Gutenberg, Sven Rainer Kantelhardt, Elefterios Archavlis, Alf Giese.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: In contrast to cranial interventions, neuronavigation in spinal surgery is used in few applications, not tapping into its full technological potential. We have developed a method to preoperatively create virtual resection planes and volumes for spinal osteotomies and export 3-D operation plans to a navigation system controlling intraoperative visualization using a surgical microscope's head-up display. The method was developed using a Sawbone ® model of the lumbar spine, demonstrating feasibility with high precision. Computer tomographic and magnetic resonance image data were imported into Amira ® , a 3-D visualization software. Resection planes were positioned, and resection volumes representing intraoperative bone removal were defined. Fused to the original Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data, the osteotomy planes were exported to the cranial version of a Brainlab ® navigation system. A navigated surgical microscope with video connection to the navigation system allowed intraoperative image injection to visualize the preplanned resection planes. CLINICAL
PRESENTATION: The workflow was applied to a patient presenting with a congenital hemivertebra of the thoracolumbar spine. Dorsal instrumentation with pedicle screws and rods was followed by resection of the deformed vertebra guided by the in-view image injection of the preplanned resection planes into the optical path of a surgical microscope. Postoperatively, the patient showed no neurological deficits, and the spine was found to be restored in near physiological posture.
CONCLUSION: The intraoperative visualization of resection planes in a microscope's head-up display was found to assist the surgeon during the resection of a complex-shaped bone wedge and may help to further increase accuracy and patient safety.
Copyright © 2017 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented reality; Osteotomy; PSO; Spinal deformity correction; Spinal navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28927210     DOI: 10.1093/ons/opw017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 2332-4252            Impact factor:   2.703


  11 in total

1.  Head-mounted display augmented reality to guide pedicle screw placement utilizing computed tomography.

Authors:  Jacob T Gibby; Samuel A Swenson; Steve Cvetko; Raj Rao; Ramin Javan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  The utility of virtual reality and augmented reality in spine surgery.

Authors:  Joon S Yoo; Dillon S Patel; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

3.  Implementation of augmented reality support in spine surgery.

Authors:  Barbara Carl; Miriam Bopp; Benjamin Saß; Benjamin Voellger; Christopher Nimsky
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Andrew Hersh; Smruti Mahapatra; Carly Weber-Levine; Tolulope Awosika; John N Theodore; Hesham M Zakaria; Ann Liu; Timothy F Witham; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-07-14

5.  Spine Surgery Supported by Augmented Reality.

Authors:  Barbara Carl; Miriam Bopp; Benjamin Saß; Mirza Pojskic; Benjamin Voellger; Christopher Nimsky
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

6.  Spinal Navigation during Orthopedic Residency Training: A Double-Edged Sword?

Authors:  Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal; Tamara Soh; Mark Tan; Colum Patrick Nolan; Chun Sing Yu; Jacob Yoong-Leong Oh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-05-09

Review 7.  Augmented Reality in Orthopedic Surgery Is Emerging from Proof of Concept Towards Clinical Studies: a Literature Review Explaining the Technology and Current State of the Art.

Authors:  Fabio A Casari; Nassir Navab; Laura A Hruby; Philipp Kriechling; Ricardo Nakamura; Romero Tori; Fátima de Lourdes Dos Santos Nunes; Marcelo C Queiroz; Philipp Fürnstahl; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-02-05

Review 8.  Spine Surgery Assisted by Augmented Reality: Where Have We Been?

Authors:  Yanting Liu; Min-Gi Lee; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Robotic Spine Surgery and Augmented Reality Systems: A State of the Art.

Authors:  Gianluca Vadalà; Sergio De Salvatore; Luca Ambrosio; Fabrizio Russo; Rocco Papalia; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-03-31

Review 10.  XR (Extended Reality: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality) Technology in Spine Medicine: Status Quo and Quo Vadis.

Authors:  Tadatsugu Morimoto; Takaomi Kobayashi; Hirohito Hirata; Koji Otani; Maki Sugimoto; Masatsugu Tsukamoto; Tomohito Yoshihara; Masaya Ueno; Masaaki Mawatari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.