Paulo A S Kadri1,2, Jean G de Oliveira3, Niklaus Krayenbühl4, Ugur Türe5, Evandro P L de Oliveira6,7, Ossama Al-Mefty8, Guilherme C Ribas2,9. 1. Division of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande-MS, Brazil. 2. Clinical Anatomy Discipline, Department of Surgery, University of São Paulo Medical School (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil. 3. Division of Cerebrovas-cular and Skull Base Surgery, Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery Associates (CENNA), Hospital Beneficência Por-tuguesa de São Paulo-SP, Brazil. 4. University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey. 6. Institute of Neuro-logical Sciences (ICNE), São Paulo-SP, Brazil. 7. Adjunct Professor of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, USA. 8. Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 9. Neurosurgeon Albert Einstein Hospital, São Paulo - SP, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical access to the temporal horn is necessary to treat tumors and vascular lesions, but is used mainly in patients with mediobasal temporal epilepsy. The surgical approaches to this cavity fall into 3 primary categories: lateral, inferior, and transsylvian. The current neurosurgical literature has underestimated the interruption of involved fiber bundles and the correlated clinical manifestations. OBJECTIVE: To delineate the interruption of fiber bundles during the different approaches to the temporal horn. METHODS: We simulated the lateral (trans-middle temporal gyrus), inferior (transparahippocampal gyrus), and transsylvian approaches in 20 previously frozen, formalin-fixed human brains (40 hemispheres). Fiber dissection was then done along the lateral and inferior aspects under the operating microscope. Each stage of dissection and its respective fiber tract interruption were defined. RESULTS: The lateral (trans-middle temporal gyrus) approach interrupted "U" fibers, the superior longitudinal fasciculus (inferior arm), occipitofrontal fasciculus (ventral segment), uncinate fasciculus (dorsolateral segment), anterior commissure (posterior segment), temporopontine, inferior thalamic peduncle (posterior fibers), posterior thalamic peduncle (anterior portion), and tapetum fibers. The inferior (transparahippocampal gyrus) approach interrupted "U" fibers, the cingulum (inferior arm), and fimbria, and transected the hippocampal formation. The transsylvian approach interrupted "U" fibers (anterobasal region of the extreme capsule), the uncinate fasciculus (ventromedial segment), and anterior commissure (anterior segment), and transected the anterosuperior aspect of the amygdala. CONCLUSION: White matter dissection improves our knowledge of the complex anatomy surrounding the temporal horn. Identifying the fiber bundles at risk during each surgical approach adds important information for choosing the appropriate surgical strategy.
BACKGROUND: Surgical access to the temporal horn is necessary to treat tumors and vascular lesions, but is used mainly in patients with mediobasal temporal epilepsy. The surgical approaches to this cavity fall into 3 primary categories: lateral, inferior, and transsylvian. The current neurosurgical literature has underestimated the interruption of involved fiber bundles and the correlated clinical manifestations. OBJECTIVE: To delineate the interruption of fiber bundles during the different approaches to the temporal horn. METHODS: We simulated the lateral (trans-middle temporal gyrus), inferior (transparahippocampal gyrus), and transsylvian approaches in 20 previously frozen, formalin-fixed human brains (40 hemispheres). Fiber dissection was then done along the lateral and inferior aspects under the operating microscope. Each stage of dissection and its respective fiber tract interruption were defined. RESULTS: The lateral (trans-middle temporal gyrus) approach interrupted "U" fibers, the superior longitudinal fasciculus (inferior arm), occipitofrontal fasciculus (ventral segment), uncinate fasciculus (dorsolateral segment), anterior commissure (posterior segment), temporopontine, inferior thalamic peduncle (posterior fibers), posterior thalamic peduncle (anterior portion), and tapetum fibers. The inferior (transparahippocampal gyrus) approach interrupted "U" fibers, the cingulum (inferior arm), and fimbria, and transected the hippocampal formation. The transsylvian approach interrupted "U" fibers (anterobasal region of the extreme capsule), the uncinate fasciculus (ventromedial segment), and anterior commissure (anterior segment), and transected the anterosuperior aspect of the amygdala. CONCLUSION: White matter dissection improves our knowledge of the complex anatomy surrounding the temporal horn. Identifying the fiber bundles at risk during each surgical approach adds important information for choosing the appropriate surgical strategy.