| Literature DB >> 28926984 |
Cinthia Alegre1,2, David Sebastián3, María E Gálvez4, Estela Baquedano5, Rafael Moliner6, Antonino S Aricò7, Vincenzo Baglio8, María J Lázaro9.
Abstract
Durability and limited catalytic activity are key impediments to the commercialization of polymer electrolyte fuel cells.Entities:
Keywords: N-doped; Pt-catalysts; carbon xerogels; oxygen reduction reaction
Year: 2017 PMID: 28926984 PMCID: PMC5615746 DOI: 10.3390/ma10091092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Textural properties (determined from N2 adsorption isotherms) and structural parameters (as determined from Raman spectra).
| Carbon Xerogel | SBET (m2·g−1) | Vpore (cm3·g−1) | Vmicro (cm3·g−1) | Vmeso c(m3·g−1) | dpore (nm) | ID/IG | G Band Position (cm−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXG-130 | 461 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.06 | 3.6 | 0.74 | 1593.5 |
| CXG-300 | 587 | 0.65 | 0.10 | 0.55 | 5.2 | 0.89 | 1591.3 |
| N-CXG-130 | 497 | 1.35 | 0.14 | 1.21 | 19.2 | 0.98 | 1597.0 |
| N-CXG-300 | 387 | 0.34 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 7.3 | 0.91 | 1595.4 |
Figure 1Pore size distribution for N-doped xerogels and their corresponding undoped counterparts (a) low R/C and (b) high R/C.
Weight percentage of C, N, and H determined by elemental analysis.
| Carbon Xerogel | C (wt %) | H (wt %) | N (wt %) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CXG-130 | 94.93 | 1.08 | 0.11 |
| CXG-300 | 94.58 | 0.84 | 0.35 |
| N-CXG-130 | 90.12 | 0.92 | 3.0 |
| N-CXG-300 | 93.30 | 0.82 | 3.4 |
Figure 2XPS spectra for N1s orbital for (a) N-CXG-130 and (b) N-CXG-300 xerogels.
Nitrogen content and the different species deconvoluted from the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) N1s band.
| Carbon Xerogel | N (at %) | N-Pyridine (at %) | N-Pyrrole (at %) | N-Graphitic (at %) | Noxidized (at %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 398.2 eV | 400.8 eV | 402.0 eV | 405.0 eV | ||
| N-CXG-130 | 3.4 | 29.7 | 46.0 | 21.3 | 3.0 |
| N-CXG-300 | 4.5 | 30.8 | 54.4 | 7.9 | 6.9 |
Figure 3XRD patterns for Pt-catalysts.
Pt crystal size determined by XRD and percentage of Pt determined by TGA.
| Catalyst | Pt Crystal Size (nm) | Pt Content (wt %) |
|---|---|---|
| Pt/CXG-130 | 5.9 | 20.7 |
| Pt/CXG-300 | 5.4 | 15.0 |
| Pt/N-CXG-130 | 4.3 | 18.9 |
| Pt/N-CXG-300 | 5.5 | 16.7 |
| Pt/Vulcan | 3.4 | 16.7 |
Figure 4TEM micrographs for carbon xerogels (CXG)-supported Pt catalysts: (a) Pt/CXG-130; (b) Pt/N-CXG-130; and (c) Pt/N-CXG-300.
Figure 5Linear sweep voltammetries obtained in a rotating disk electrode (RDE) in an O2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at ω = 1600 rpm; scan rate: 5 mV·s−1.
Kinetic parameters obtained from RDE measurements (potential vs. RHE), along with the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) calculated from cyclic voltammetry.
| Catalyst | ORR Onset Potential (V vs. RHE) at −0.1 mA·cm−2 | ORR Half-Wave Potential (V vs. RHE) | Limiting Current Density (mA·cm−2) | n (Koutecky-Levich) | ECSA (m2·g−1 Pt) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pt/CXG-130 | 0.94 | 0.78 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 25 |
| Pt/CXG-300 | 0.97 | 0.83 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 39 |
| Pt/N-CXG-130 | 0.97 | 0.82 | 4.6 | 3.5 | 33 |
| Pt/N-CXG-300 | 0.97 | 0.84 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 24 |
| Pt/Vulcan | 0.95 | 0.84 | 4.9 | 4.0 | 42 |
Figure 6(a) LSV curves for Pt/N-CXG-130 at different rotation rates recorded in a 0.5 M H2SO4 O2-saturated solution. Scan rate: 5 mV·s−1; (b) Koutecky-Levich plots for Pt/N-CXG-130 at different potentials. The legend refers to potential values (V vs. RHE).
Figure 7(a) Linear sweep voltammetries (LSV) curves for Pt/N-CXG-300 at different rotation rates recorded in a 0.5 M H2SO4 O2-saturated solution. Scan rate: 5 mV·s−1; (b) Koutecky-Levich plots for Pt/N-CXG-300 at different potentials. The legend refers to potential values (V vs. RHE).
Figure 8Linear sweep voltammetries obtained in a gas diffusion electrode (GDE) feeding O2 to the backing layer of the electrode at the beginning of test (BoT) and at the end of test (EoT), consisting of 1000 cycles between 0.6 and 1.2 V vs. RHE. 0.5 M H2SO4 solution; scan rate: 5 mV·s−1; 0.1 mg Pt cm−2.
Electrochemical surface area (ECSA) at the beginning and at the end of the accelerated degradation tests, calculated from cyclic voltammetry.
| Catalyst | ECSA BoT (m2·g−1 Pt) | ECSA EoT (m2·g−1 Pt) | % Loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pt/CXG-130 | 25 | 14 | 47 |
| Pt/N-CXG-130 | 33 | 19 | 42 |
| Pt/N-CXG-300 | 24 | 16 | 33 |
| Pt/Vulcan | 42 | 28 | 33 |