| Literature DB >> 28926965 |
Camille Adam Kouamé1,2, Nestor Kouakou Kouassi3,4, Denis Yao N'dri5, Kingsley Kwadwo Asare Pereko6, Maria Cristina Casiraghi7, Abodo Jacko Rhedoor8, Georges N'guessan Amani9.
Abstract
The glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) of four culinary preferences including five local street dishes prepared from three varieties of plantain at different maturity stages was determined. The GI was obtained following ISO/FDI 26642:2010 protocol, and the GL was calculated from test foods' GI, considering the amount of available carbohydrate in the traditional portion size. GI values were 44 for Klaclo (with Ameletiha variety at all black stage), 39 for Aloco (with Agnrin variety at full yellow stage), 39 for Aloco (with Agnrin variety at full yellow with black spots stage); 45 for Chips (with Ameletiha variety at green stage) and 89 for Banane braisée (with Afoto variety at light green stage). GI values were inversely correlated with the total sugar and carbohydrate in foods (p < 0.01), and no relationship existed between the GI values and the amount of protein (p = 0.89). Except for Chips (GL = 12), the GLs of the others foods were high (GL > 20). Contrary to Banane braisée, the consumption of Klaclo, Aloco, and Chips may promote the control of postprandial glucose response. Data provides the first GI published values of plantain-based foods commonly consumed in the urban area of Abidjan (Côte d'Ivoire).Entities:
Keywords: diabetes mellitus; glycemic index; glycemic load; plantain cultivar; snack foods
Year: 2017 PMID: 28926965 PMCID: PMC5615295 DOI: 10.3390/foods6090083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Baseline clinical and anthropometric characteristics (mean ± standard error of mean (SEM)) of subjects (n = 30) involved in the study.
| Parameters | Sample | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SEM | Range | |
| Age (years) | 30 | 0.5 | 25–35 |
| Gender (male/female) | 23/7 | - | - |
| Body weight (kg) | 63.3 | 1.3 | 47–74 |
| Height (m) | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1.6–1.9 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.2 | 0.3 | 18.1–24.6 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 4.6 | 0.1 | 4.1–5 |
| HbA1c (%) | 3.0 | 0.1 | 2.1–4.0 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 107.7 | 1.7 | 90–120 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 73.0 | 1.3 | 60–90 |
BMI = body mass index, HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c, BP = Blood pressure.
Composition and local cooking/processing methods applied to formulate the tested foods.
| Food Tests | Code | Plantain Species ( | Ripening Stage at Use | Local Name | Cooking Method | Major Ingredients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charcoal-roasted plantain | raf2 | Afoto | light green (stage 2) | Banane braisée | Roasting | - |
| Fried plantain | aag6 | Agnrin | full yellow (stage 6) | Aloco | Deep frying | Salt, refined palm oil |
| Fried plantain | aag7 | Agnrin | full yellow with black spots (stage 7) | Aloco | Deep frying | Salt, refined palm oil |
| Fritters plantain | kam8 | Ameletiha | all black (stage 8) | Klaclo | Deep frying | Salt, refined palm oil, corn flour (30%) |
| Chips plantain | cam1 | Ameletiha | green (stage 1) | Chips | Deep frying | Salt, refined palm oil |
Proximate composition of tested meals.
| Food Samples (Code) | Banane Braisée (raf2) | Klaclo (kam8) | Aloco (aag7) | Aloco (aag6) | Chips (cam1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry matter (g/100 g) | 44.5 ± 0.1 d | 63.7 ± 0.1 b | 66.2 ± 0.0 c | 63.6 ± 0.0 b | 66.4 ± 0.1 a |
| Ash (g/100 g) | 1.4 ± 0.0 c | 1.1 ± 0.0 d | 1.0 ± 0.0 e | 1.5 ± 0.0 b | 2.0 ± 0.0 a |
| Proteins (g/100 g) | 5.3 ± 0.0 c | 6.1 ± 0.0 b | 8.8 ± 0.0 a | 4.4 ± 0.0 d | 5.3 ± 0.0 c |
| Lipids (g/100 g) | 0.3 ± 0.1 e | 14.1 ± 0.2 a | 12.4 ± 0.0 b | 11.6 ± 0.1 c | 10.9 ± 0.0 d |
| Total CHO (g/100 g) * | 93.1 ± 0.1 a | 78.7 ± 0.2 d | 78 ± 0.0 e | 82.6 ± 0.1 b | 81.9 ± 0.1 c |
| Total sugars (g/100 g) | 6.5 ± 0.1 c | 12.5 ± 0.3 a | 10.3 ± 0.3 b | 9.8 ± 0.1 b | 4.0 ± 0.3 d |
| Starch (g/100 g) | 77.9 ± 0.2 a | 59.6 ± 0.0 e | 60.9 ± 0.2 d | 65.5 ± 0.2 c | 70.1±0.3 b |
| Total dietary fiber (g/100 g) | 1.7 ± 0.0 a | 1.6 ± 0.0 b | 1.6 ± 0.0 ba | 1.6 ± 0.0 ba | 1.7 ± 0.0 a |
| Energetic Value (kcal/100 g) ** | 395.8 ± 0.4 e | 465.7 ± 1 a | 458.0 ± 0.3 b | 451.9 ±0.4 c | 446.7 ± 0.2 d |
Data are expressed on dry matter basis. Data in the same line with different superscript letter are significantly different (p < 0.05) as assessed by Tukey’s test. Data are means (standard deviation) of three independent experiments. * Calculated by difference of moisture content, ash, fiber, lipids and protein. ** Energetic value = 4 × %total carbohydrates + 4 × %protein + 9 × %lipids (kcal/100g)
Glycemic index and glycemic load values of tested product.
| Food | Code | Available CHO (g/100 g of Food Wet Weight) | Experimental Portion (g) | GI (Mean ± SEM) | Category 1 | Serving Size | GL | Category 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banane braisée | raf2 | 41 | 122.9 | 28 | 88 ± 1.8 a | High | 178.8 | 64 | High |
| Klaclo | kam8 | 49 | 101.8 | 28 | 44 ± 0.3 c | Low | 227.0 | 46 | High |
| Aloco | aag6 | 50 | 99.0 | 29 | 39 ± 0.3 b | Low | 281.1 | 55 | High |
| Aloco | aag7 | 52 | 97.0 | 29 | 39 ± 0.5 b | Low | 281.1 | 55 | High |
| Chips | cam1 | 53 | 93.8 | 28 | 45 ± 0.3 c | Low | 49.4 | 12 | Medium |
a,b,c Data in the same column with different letter superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05); n = number of values included after outliers analysis. GI = Glycemic Index; GL = Glycemic Load; CHO = Carbohydrate. 1 Glycemic indexes were classified as high (≥70), medium (56–69), and low (≤55); 2 Glycemic loads were classified as high (≥20), medium (11–19), and low (≤10) (www.glycemicindex.com).
Figure 1Glycemic response curves elicited by 50 g available carbohydrate portions of reference glucose, Banane braisée, Klaclo, Aloco aag6, Aloco aag7, and Chips. Values are the mean for 30 subjects with their SEM represented by vertical bars.