Literature DB >> 28926146

Nurses' clinical reasoning practices that support safe medication administration: An integrative review of the literature.

Emily Rohde1, Elizabeth Domm1.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To review the current literature about nurses' clinical reasoning practices that support safe medication administration.
BACKGROUND: The literature about medication administration frequently focuses on avoiding medication errors. Nurses' clinical reasoning used during medication administration to maintain medication safety receives less attention in the literature. As healthcare professionals, nurses work closely with patients, assessing and intervening to promote mediation safety prior to, during and after medication administration. They also provide discharge teaching about using medication safely. Nurses' clinical reasoning and practices that support medication safety are often invisible when the focus is medication errors avoidance.
DESIGN: An integrative literature review was guided by Whittemore and Knafl's (Journal of Advanced Nursing, 5, 2005 and 546) five-stage review of the 11 articles that met review criteria. This review is modelled after Gaffney et al.'s (Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25, 2016 and 906) integrative review on medical error recovery.
METHODS: Health databases were accessed and systematically searched for research reporting nurses' clinical reasoning practices that supported safe medication administration. The level and quality of evidence of the included research articles were assessed using The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Rating Scale©.
RESULTS: Nurses have a central role in safe medication administration, including but not limited to risk awareness about the potential for medication errors. Nurses assess patients and their medication and use knowledge and clinical reasoning to administer medication safely. Results indicated nurses' use of clinical reasoning to maintain safe medication administration was inadequately articulated in 10 of 11 studies reviewed.
CONCLUSION: Nurses are primarily responsible for safe medication administration. Nurses draw from their foundational knowledge of patient conditions and organisational processes and use clinical reasoning that supports safe medication practice. There was minimal evidence clearly articulating nurses' clinical reasoning used to support medication safety. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review focused on finding evidence of nurses' clinical reasoning that supported safe medication administration.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical decision-making; clinical judgement; clinical reasoning; medication management; nurse roles; patient safety

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28926146     DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  4 in total

1.  What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies.

Authors:  Yvonne Pfeiffer; Chantal Zimmermann; David L B Schwappach
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Assessment of medication adherence, medication safety awareness and medication practice among patients with lung cancer: A multicentre cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ningsheng Wang; Biqi Ren; Haisheng You; Yue Chen; Shuzhi Lin; Shuang Lei; Bianling Feng
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.318

3.  Assessing Nursing Students' Self-Perceptions about Safe Medication Management: Design and Validation of a Tool, the NURSPeM.

Authors:  Pilar Fuster-Linares; Cristina Alfonso-Arias; Alberto Gallart Fernández-Puebla; Encarna Rodríguez-Higueras; Silvia García-Mayor; Isabel Font-Jimenez; Mireia Llaurado-Serra
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 4.  Nurses and Pharmaceutical Care: Interprofessional, Evidence-Based Working to Improve Patient Care and Outcomes.

Authors:  Tinne Dilles; Jana Heczkova; Styliani Tziaferi; Ann Karin Helgesen; Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl; Bart Van Rompaey; Carolien G Sino; Sue Jordan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.