Literature DB >> 28926044

Running out of lithium? A route to differentiate between capacity losses and active lithium losses in lithium-ion batteries.

Florian Holtstiege1, Andrea Wilken, Martin Winter, Tobias Placke.   

Abstract

Active lithium loss (ALL) resulting in a capacity loss (QALL), which is caused by lithium consuming parasitic reactions like SEI formation, is a major reason for capacity fading and, thus, for a reduction of the usable energy density of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). QALL is often equated with the accumulated irreversible capacity (QAIC). However, QAIC is also influenced by non-lithium consuming parasitic reactions, which do not reduce the active lithium content of the cell, but induce a parasitic current. In this work, a novel approach is proposed in order to differentiate between QAIC and QALL. The determination of QALL is based on the remaining active lithium content of a given cell, which can be determined by de-lithiation of the cathode with the help of the reference electrode of a three-electrode set-up. Lithium non-consuming parasitic reactions, which do not influence the active lithium content have no influence on this determination. In order to evaluate this novel approach, three different anode materials (graphite, carbon spheres and a silicon/graphite composite) were investigated. It is shown that during the first charge/discharge cycles QALL is described moderately well by QAIC. However, the difference between QAIC and QALL rises with increasing cycle number. With this approach, a differentiation between "simple" irreversible capacities and truly detrimental "active Li losses" is possible and, thus, Coulombic efficiency can be directly related to the remaining useable cell capacity for the first time. Overall, the exact determination of the remaining active lithium content of the cell is of great importance, because it allows a statement on whether the reduction in lithium content is crucial for capacity fading or whether the fading is related to other degradation mechanisms such as material or electrode failure.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28926044     DOI: 10.1039/c7cp05405j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  5 in total

1.  Advanced Dual-Ion Batteries with High-Capacity Negative Electrodes Incorporating Black Phosphorus.

Authors:  Jens Matthies Wrogemann; Lukas Haneke; Thrinathreddy Ramireddy; Joop Enno Frerichs; Irin Sultana; Ying Ian Chen; Frank Brink; Michael Ryan Hansen; Martin Winter; Alexey M Glushenkov; Tobias Placke
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 17.521

2.  N-Type Doped Silicon Thin Film on a Porous Cu Current Collector as the Negative Electrode for Li-Ion Batteries.

Authors:  Aliya Mukanova; Arailym Nurpeissova; Sung-Soo Kim; Maksym Myronov; Zhumabay Bakenov
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.911

3.  Opportunities and Challenges of Li2 C4 O4 as Pre-Lithiation Additive for the Positive Electrode in NMC622||Silicon/Graphite Lithium Ion Cells.

Authors:  Aurora Gomez-Martin; Maike Michelle Gnutzmann; Egy Adhitama; Lars Frankenstein; Bastian Heidrich; Martin Winter; Tobias Placke
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 17.521

4.  Hydrothermal-derived carbon as a stabilizing matrix for improved cycling performance of silicon-based anodes for lithium-ion full cells.

Authors:  Mirco Ruttert; Florian Holtstiege; Jessica Hüsker; Markus Börner; Martin Winter; Tobias Placke
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Poly(Ethylene Oxide)-based Electrolyte for Solid-State-Lithium-Batteries with High Voltage Positive Electrodes: Evaluating the Role of Electrolyte Oxidation in Rapid Cell Failure.

Authors:  Gerrit Homann; Lukas Stolz; Jijeesh Nair; Isidora Cekic Laskovic; Martin Winter; Johannes Kasnatscheew
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.