Literature DB >> 28925586

HaemoPREF: Further evaluation of patient perception and preference for treatment in a real world setting.

S Bonanad1, M Schulz2, A Gordo3, D Spurden4, M Cicchetti5, J C Cappelleri6, C Tolley7, H Staunton7, E Brohan7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to haemophilia A (HA) treatment may be influenced by patients' beliefs about their condition and treatment. Furthermore, difficulties administering treatment may lead to poor adherence. New treatment strategies aim to reduce the burden associated with administration and to improve patient perception of treatment, which, in turn, increase adherence levels. AIMS: This study aimed to examine patient perception of HA treatment and related factors using patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires and to confirm the psychometric properties of a recently developed questionnaire, the HaemoPREF.
METHODS: A non-interventional, cross-sectional, questionnaire study was conducted with adult HA patients in Spain (n=31), Germany (n=10) and Italy (n=48), who were using ReFacto AF with the FuseNGo administration device. Patients completed the HaemoPREF and other questionnaires measuring related constructs: treatment adherence, satisfaction and well-being, online at two time points. Correlational, regression and psychometric analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: PRO scores indicated that patients are satisfied with and adherent to their treatment. Multivariate regression of the HaemoPREF global score identified a number of significant predictors (P≤.05). The HaemoPREF Global Score had a moderate relationship with subscales on the related questionnaires (mean correlation=0.43; range=0.39-0.48). The HaemoPREF demonstrated good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.82), internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha range=0.69-0.82) and convergent validity with measures of treatment satisfaction (Spearman correlation coefficient, r=.48) and well-being (r=.41).
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that patients using ReFacto AF with FuseNGo were satisfied with and adherent to their treatment. The HaemoPREF can identify important concepts relating to patient treatment experience in HA.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ease of Use; HaemoPREF; Haemophilia; Patient-Reported Outcome; Preference; Treatment Satisfaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28925586     DOI: 10.1111/hae.13321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  4 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction and acceptability of an on-demand and on-prophylaxis device for factor VIII delivery in patients with hemophilia A.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Minno; Elena Santagostino; Massimo Morfini; Cosimo Ettorre; Dorina Cultrera; Erminia Baldacci; Eleonora Russo; Cristiano Gallucci
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.711

2.  Patient perspectives regarding gene therapy in haemophilia: Interviews from the PAVING study.

Authors:  Eline van Overbeeke; Sissel Michelsen; Brett Hauber; Kathelijne Peerlinck; Cedric Hermans; Catherine Lambert; Michel Goldman; Steven Simoens; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 4.287

3.  Development and testing of the Satisfaction Questionnaire with Intravenous or Subcutaneous Hemophilia Injection and results from the Phase 3 HAVEN 3 study of emicizumab prophylaxis in persons with haemophilia A without FVIII inhibitors.

Authors:  Christine Kempton; Peter Trask; Aric Parnes; Markus Niggli; Avrita Campinha-Bacote; Michael U Callaghan; Niamh O'Connell; Ido Paz-Priel; Johnny N Mahlangu
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.287

4.  Patient preferences for gene therapy in haemophilia: Results from the PAVING threshold technique survey.

Authors:  Eline van Overbeeke; Brett Hauber; Sissel Michelsen; Kathelijne Peerlinck; Catherine Lambert; Cedric Hermans; Phu Quoc Lê; Michel Goldman; Steven Simoens; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.263

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.