| Literature DB >> 28924560 |
Reza Akhondzade1, Sholeh Nesioonpour1, Mohammadreza Gousheh2, Farhad Soltani2, Mohsen Davarimoghadam3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of different adjuvants on brachial plexus block.Entities:
Keywords: Magnesium Sulfate; Postoperative Pain; Supraclavicular Block; Ultrasound
Year: 2017 PMID: 28924560 PMCID: PMC5594567 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.14232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anesth Pain Med ISSN: 2228-7523
Baseline Characteristics of the Participants[a,b]
| Characteristics | Group N (N = 26) | Group M (N = 26) | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.00 | ||
| Female | 8 (30.8) | 8 (30.8) | |
| Male | 18 (69.2) | 18 (69.2) | |
|
| 37.03±12.23 | 36.65±13.93 | 0.91 |
|
| 172.50±9.33 | 172.03±9.91 | 0.86 |
|
| 75.26±10.77 | 75.61±14.77 | 0.92 |
aData are expressed as mean±SD unless otherwise stated.
bGroup N: Lidocaine + Normal saline; group M: Lidocain + Magnesium.
Sensory and Motor Block Characteristics of the Participants[a]
| Characteristics | Group N (N = 26) | Group M (N = 26) | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| < 0.0001 | ||
| Yes | 19 (84.6) | 4 (26.9) | |
| No | 7 (15.4) | 22 (73.1) | |
|
| 10.07 ± 1.68 | 14.23±2.23 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 103.81 ± 8.09 | 123.38±6.72 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 17.59 ± 1.84 | 23.00±2.13 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 80.25 ± 6.80 | 92.80±7.33 | < 0.0001 |
aData are expressed as mean ± SD unless otherwise stated.
VAS During 24 Hours After Surgery Between the Two Study Groups[a]
| Variables | Time points of Study, h | P Value[ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 24 | ||
|
| < 0.0001 | |||||||
|
| 0.50 (0.12) | 2.11 (0.13) | 2.65 (0.13) | 3.57 (0.16) | 3.07 (0.17) | 2.00 (0.09) | 1.76 (0.10) | |
|
| 0 (0)[ | 0.65 (0.12)[ | 1.23 (0.16)[ | 1.84 (0.17)[ | 1.96 (0.26)[ | 0.76 (0.14)[ | 0.50 (0.10)[ | |
aThe values are expressed as mean (SE).
bThe P-value for Group-Time interaction (Based on the results of GEE analysis)
cP < 0.05 for statistical difference between the two groups at the same time-points.
Figure 1.Time-Series Comparison of the VAS Score in the Two Groups